This protocol describes the construction and molecular evaluation of a marker-free, multigene recombinant Escherichia coli strain designed for the chromosomal integration of genes associated with heavy-metal resistance and sequestration.
Method Article
This protocol describes the construction and molecular evaluation of a marker-free, multigene recombinant Escherichia coli strain designed for the chromosomal integration of genes associated with heavy-metal resistance and sequestration.
Heavy metal contamination remains a significant environmental challenge due to the persistence, toxicity, and bioaccumulation of metal pollutants. Genetically engineered bacteria offer a potential approach to heavy metal remediation; however, plasmid-based expression systems can present limitations associated with plasmid maintenance and antibiotic selection. This study describes a protocol for constructing a marker-free, multigene recombinant E. coli strain designed for the chromosomal integration of genes associated with heavy-metal resistance and sequestration. A 4,741 bp multigene cassette comprising cadD, cadA, and metallothionein (mt), together with a lipoprotein outer membrane protein A (Lpp-OmpA) surface display system and a green fluorescent protein (gfp) reporter gene under the control of the constitutive pyruvate dehydrogenase (Ppdh) promoter, was designed and synthesized. The construct was cloned into the pKIKOArsBKm integration vector and introduced into E. coli MG1655 using lambda (λ) Red-mediated recombination. The kanamycin resistance cassette was subsequently excised using the flippase–flippase recognition target (FLP-FRT) recombination system. Construct assembly and chromosomal integration were evaluated by restriction enzyme analysis, plasmid isolation, and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification, while loss of antibiotic resistance was assessed by antibiotic sensitivity testing. Amplification of the expected cadD, cadA, and mt fragments from genomic DNA, together with the absence of detectable plasmid DNA, provided evidence consistent with chromosomal integration of the multigene cassette. Although this protocol establishes a framework for constructing and molecularly evaluating the recombinant strain, definitive confirmation of the integration locus, functional gene expression, long-term genetic stability, and heavy metal biosorption performance requires further experimental validation.
Heavy metal contamination has become a major environmental concern due to the persistence, non-biodegradability, and toxicity of metal pollutants. Unlike organic contaminants, heavy metals accumulate in ecosystems and enter the food chain through bioaccumulation and biomagnification, posing serious risks to environmental and human health. Conventional remediation technologies, including chemical precipitation, ion exchange, and membrane filtration, are often associated with high operational costs, limited efficiency at low metal concentrations, and the generation of secondary pollutants. Consequently, biological remediation strategies have gained increasing attention as environmentally sustainable and cost-effective alternatives for heavy metal removal1.
Among these biological approaches, bacterial biosorption has emerged as a promising technology for heavy metal remediation. Biosorption involves the passive uptake of metal ions by biological materials through physicochemical interactions between metal ions and functional groups such as carboxyl, hydroxyl, amino, and phosphate groups present on the microbial cell surface2. These interactions facilitate metal removal through ion exchange, complexation, coordination, and precipitation mechanisms. Owing to their high surface-area-to-volume ratio, rapid growth, and diverse cell surface chemistries, bacteria are particularly effective biosorbents. The efficiency of bacterial biosorption depends on multiple factors, including bacterial species, metal ion characteristics, pH, temperature, and the presence of competing ions3. In addition to passive adsorption, bacteria can actively remove heavy metals through intracellular sequestration, bioaccumulation, biomineralization, and other detoxification mechanisms, thereby enhancing their metal removal capacity4.
Bacterial adaptation to heavy metal-contaminated environments is mediated by diverse resistance mechanisms, including membrane-associated efflux pumps, metal-binding proteins, enzymatic detoxification systems, and oxidation-reduction pathways that collectively maintain intracellular metal homeostasis. Several heavy metal resistance operons, including the mer, chr, ars, and cad systems, have been extensively characterized and represent valuable genetic resources for engineering bacterial biosorbents. The mer operon mediates mercury detoxification by reducing toxic Hg2⁺ to volatile elemental mercury (Hg°)5, whereas the chr operon confers chromate resistance by reducing Cr6⁺ to the less toxic Cr3⁺ 6. Similarly, the ars operon detoxifies arsenate through reduction to arsenite followed by active efflux7. The cadA gene, identified in Staphylococcus aureusRN4220 and Bacillus megaterium TWSL_4, encodes a P-type ATPase that actively exports cadmium ions from the cytoplasm, thereby reducing intracellular toxicity and contributing to bacterial metal resistance8,9. Metal binding proteins such as metallothioneins and phytochelatins further enhance heavy metal tolerance by sequestering metal ions and preventing their interaction with essential cellular components10.
Recent advances in synthetic biology have enabled the rational engineering of bacterial biosorbents with enhanced metal binding capabilities. Previous studies have demonstrated improved heavy metal removal through overexpression of metal-binding proteins in Bacillus subtilis and Pseudomonas putida11, immobilization of bacterial cells within alginate matrices or biofilms to improve stability and reusability12, and the introduction of synthetic metal-binding peptides into E. coli to increase mercury and arsenic biosorption13. Despite these advances, most engineered biosorbents rely on plasmid-based expression systems that require continuous antibiotic selection and are susceptible to plasmid instability, segregational loss, variable gene copy number, and increased metabolic burden. These limitations reduce their suitability for environmental and industrial applications where long-term genetic stability and biosafety are critical.
The strategic development of bacterial biosorbents, therefore, requires integrating microbiology, molecular biology, synthetic biology, and environmental engineering. Advances in genomics, proteomics, and metabolomics have further improved our understanding of bacterial responses to heavy metal stress, facilitating the identification of novel genes and regulatory pathways for engineering improved biosorbents.
Unlike conventional plasmid-based approaches, this study establishes an engineering platform to construct a chromosomally integrated, marker-free, multigene recombinant E. coli strain harboring genes associated with heavy metal resistance and sequestration. The engineering strategy combines λ Red recombineering, FLP-FRT-mediated marker excision, a constitutive multigene cassette, and an Lpp-OmpA-based surface-display design. The multigene cassette incorporated cadD (619 bp), cadA (2,564 bp), and metallothionein (mt) (154 bp), selected based on their previously reported roles in heavy metal resistance and metal sequestration. The genes were organized under the constitutive Ppdh promoter, with individual ribosome-binding sites, and mt was fused to Lpp-OmpA for intended surface localization. A downstream gfp reporter gene was incorporated into the construct.
The cassette was designed for chromosomal integration into E. coli MG1655 rather than continued maintenance on a multicopy plasmid. This strategy was selected to establish an engineering framework that may reduce dependence on plasmid maintenance and continuous antibiotic selection. FLP-FRT-mediated excision of the selectable antibiotic resistance marker was incorporated into the workflow, and antibiotic sensitivity testing was used to assess the resulting phenotype. The present study focuses on the assembly of constructs and the molecular evaluation of the recombinant strain. Long-term genetic stability, functional expression of the integrated genes, protein localization, heavy metal removal, and environmental performance were not evaluated and require further experimental validation.
This protocol is intended for researchers in molecular biology, microbial biotechnology, and synthetic biology who aim to construct marker-free, chromosomally integrated multigene bacterial strains. The method is particularly suitable for laboratory-scale genetic engineering and molecular evaluation of recombinant E. coli strains designed for future heavy-metal bioremediation research, rather than for direct environmental application.
All experiments were conducted in accordance with institutional laboratory biosafety guidelines and applicable regulations for handling genetically modified microorganisms. All materials and software used in the current study are listed in the Table of Materials.
1. Design and in silico analysis of the multigene construct.
2. Construct the multigene biosorbent cassette.
3. Cloning of the biosorbent cassette into the chromosomal integration vector (pKIKOArsBKm) and integration into the host genome (E. coli MG1655)
4. Excise the kanamycin resistance marker.
5. Analyze GFP expression of the constructed whole cell biosorbent by fluorescence microscopy.
In-silico design of the multigene biosorbent construct
The designed multigene biosorbent cassette had a total length of 4,741 bp and consisted of the constitutive Ppdh promoter followed by the heavy metal resistance genes cadD, cadA, and mt, arranged as a polycistronic operon. Individual ribosome-binding sites (RBS) were incorporated upstream of each coding sequence to facilitate efficient translation, while a gfp reporter gene was included downstream of the biosorbent genes to enable monitoring of construct expression (Figure 1).

Figure 1: Design and organization of the multigene construct. The 4,741-bp multigene cassette was designed with the constitutive pyruvate dehydrogenase (Ppdh) promoter followed by an operator region to drive expression of genes associated with heavy metal resistance and sequestration. The construct contains the heavy metal resistance genes cadD and cadA, the metallothionein (mt) gene, a lipoprotein outer membrane protein A (Lpp-OmpA) surface-display component fused to mt for intended cell-surface localization, and the gfp reporter gene. Individual ribosome-binding sites (RBS; 5′-AGGAGG-3′) were incorporated upstream of the respective coding sequences to support translation within the multigene cassette. A terminator sequence is located downstream of gfp. The complete cassette was designed as a 4,741-bp construct for subsequent cloning and chromosomal integration in E. coli. Abbreviations: Ppdh = pyruvate dehydrogenase promoter; RBS = ribosome-binding site; Lpp-OmpA = lipoprotein–outer membrane protein A; mt = metallothionein; gfp = green fluorescent protein gene; bp = base pairs; E. coli = Escherichia coli. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
To facilitate extracellular metal sequestration, the mt gene was fused to the Lpp-OmpA outer membrane anchor to enable surface localization of the metallothionein protein. Based on the construct design, CadD and CadA were targeted to the inner membrane as transmembrane metal transport proteins, whereas the Lpp-OmpA-Mt fusion protein was targeted to the outer membrane. The GFP reporter protein was designed for cytoplasmic expression to facilitate monitoring of biosorbent gene expression (Figure 2).

Figure 2: Predicted localization of proteins expressed from the multigene biosorbent construct. CadD and CadA were designed for localization within the inner membrane, the lipoprotein outer membrane protein A (Lpp-OmpA)-metallothionein fusion was targeted to the outer membrane, and green fluorescent protein was included as a cytoplasmic reporter protein. Abbreviations: Lpp-OmpA = lipoprotein–outer membrane protein A; Mt = metallothionein; GFP = green fluorescent protein. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The sources of nucleotide sequences of each genetic element incorporated into the biosorbent construct are listed in Table 1.
| Genetic element in the biosorbent construct | Location in the construct (bp) | Source/Reference |
| Ppdh | 7-74 | Gao et al. 2002.14 |
| Operator | 75-92 | Operator region of cad D of Staphylococcus epidermidis strain TWSL_22 : NCBI Gene Bank accession no: MK900473.1 |
| cadD | 97-716 | NCBI Gene Bank accession no: MK900473.1 |
| cadA | 770-3334 | NCBI Gene Bank accession no: MK327282.1 |
| Lpp-OmpA | 3385-3754 | Stathopoulo et al. 1995. 15 |
| mt | 3755-3909 | NCBI Gene Bank accession no: MK900456.1 |
| gfp | 3960-4679 | TPMV_P-EGFP_H-His6 vector, NCBI Gene Bank accession no:MF379627.1 |
| Terminator | 4684-4741 | Terminator region of cadAC operon of Bacillus megaterium strain TWSL-4 : NCBI Gene Bank accession no: MK327282.1 |
Table 1: Sources of nucleotide sequences for the genetic elements in the biosorbent construct. The table summarizes the genetic elements incorporated into the 4,741-bp multigene construct, including their sequence sources, accession numbers or references, and nucleotide positions within the gene construct. Abbreviations: Ppdh = pyruvate dehydrogenase promoter; Lpp-OmpA = lipoprotein–outer membrane protein A; mt = metallothionein; gfp = green fluorescent protein gene; NCBI = National Center for Biotechnology Information; bp = base pairs.
Transformation and verification of the synthesized construct into E. coli BL21(DE3)
The recombinant pET-21a plasmid harboring the biosorbent gene cassette was successfully verified by restriction enzyme digestion (Figure 3A). Double digestion with BamHI and XhoI generated two DNA fragments corresponding to the pET-21a vector backbone (5,331 bp) and the biosorbent gene cassette (4,741 bp), consistent with the expected construct size. Although the two DNA fragments exhibited limited separation on the 1% agarose gel due to their similar sizes, both fragments were clearly distinguishable, confirming the integrity of the recombinant construct.

Figure 3: Construction and verification of the recombinant biosorbent plasmid. (A) Restriction enzyme analysis of the synthesized biosorbent construct cloned into the pET-21a expression vector. Lane 1, 1 kb DNA ladder; lanes 2–3, double-digested recombinant plasmid showing the pET-21a vector backbone (5,331 bp) and the biosorbent gene cassette (4,741 bp); lane 4, undigested recombinant plasmid. (B) Ampicillin-resistant E. coli BL21(DE3) transformants carrying the recombinant biosorbent plasmid. (C) Restriction enzyme analysis of plasmids isolated from representative transformants. Lane 1, BamHI-digested plasmid; lane 2, XhoI-digested plasmid; lane 3, BamHI/XhoI double-digested plasmid; lane 4, 1 kb DNA ladder. Abbreviations: DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid; bp = base pairs; kb = kilobases; E. coli = Escherichia coli. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Following the transformation of the recombinant plasmid into E. coli BL21(DE3), ampicillin-resistant colonies were successfully recovered (Figure 3B). Plasmid DNA isolated from representative transformants was subsequently analyzed by restriction enzyme digestion. Digestion with BamHI, XhoI, and the combined double digestion generated the expected restriction profiles, confirming the successful propagation of the recombinant biosorbent plasmid in E. coli BL21(DE3) (Figure 3C).
Evaluation of chromosomal integration of the biosorbent gene cassette into E. coli MG1655
The biosorbent gene cassette was successfully cloned into the chromosomal integration vector pKIKOArsBKm. Recombinant clones were initially selected on LB agar supplemented with kanamycin (50 µg/mL) (Figure 4A). Restriction enzyme analysis confirmed successful cloning of the biosorbent cassette into the integration vector (Figure 4B). Linearization of the recombinant plasmid with NotI produced the expected DNA fragment of approximately 8.9 kb, while double digestion with BamHI and SacI released the 4.7-kb biosorbent cassette from the 4.2-kb vector backbone, confirming correct insertion of the construct into pKIKOArsBKm. The undigested plasmid exhibited the expected nicked and supercoiled conformations.

Figure 4: Construction of the recombinant chromosomal integration vector carrying the biosorbent gene cassette. (A) Kanamycin-resistant E. coli Pir1 colonies carrying the recombinant pKIKOArsBKm plasmid. (B) Restriction enzyme analysis of recombinant pKIKOArsBKm. Lane 1, 1 kb DNA ladder; lane 2, undigested recombinant plasmid; lane 3, NotI-linearized plasmid (~8.9 kb); lane 4, BamHI/SacI double-digested plasmid showing the 4.2-kb vector backbone and the 4.7-kb biosorbent cassette. Abbreviations: DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid; kb = kilobases; E. coli = Escherichia coli. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
The linearized recombinant pKIKOArsBKm construct was subsequently introduced into electrocompetent E. coli MG1655(pKD46) cells to facilitate λ Red-mediated chromosomal integration. Following selection on kanamycin-containing medium, genomic DNA and plasmid DNA were isolated from representative recombinant colonies to verify successful integration.
As shown in Figure 5, genomic DNA was isolated from representative recombinant colonies (Lane 1), whereas no detectable plasmid DNA was observed following plasmid isolation (Lane 2). PCR amplification using the gene-specific primers described in Table 2 generated amplicons of the expected sizes for cadD (619 bp), cadA (2,564 bp), and mt (154 bp) from the genomic DNA preparation (Lanes 4–6). Together, the absence of detectable plasmid DNA and detection of the three target genes in the genomic DNA preparation provided evidence consistent with chromosomal integration of the multigene biosorbent cassette in E. coli MG1655.

Figure 5: Molecular evaluation of the recombinant E. coli strain harboring biosorbent gene cassette. Lane 1, genomic DNA isolated from recombinant E. coli MG1655; lane 2, plasmid isolation from the corresponding recombinant colony showing the absence of detectable plasmid DNA; lane 3, 100 bp DNA ladder; lane 4, PCR amplification of cadD (619 bp); lane 5, PCR amplification of cadA (2,564 bp); lane 6, PCR amplification of mt (154 bp). Abbreviations: DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid; PCR = polymerase chain reaction; bp = base pairs; mt = metallothionein; E. coli = Escherichia coli. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| Target DNA sequence | Primer name | Oligonucleotide sequence (5’→3’) | *Tan (℃) | Expected size of the PCR product (bp) |
| cadD | SD-EF | GAATTCATGATTCA GACTATTGTAACTG | 50 | 619 |
| SE-XHR | CTCGAGAAATATAA ATCCTAAAATTGTTTG | |||
| cadA | PD-BF | GGATCCGACACAAT GAAACACGAAGA | 56 | 2564 |
| PF-XHR | CCGCTCGAGCGGCAT GTAATTTTTCATTTTGA GTAAGCGAAG | |||
| mt | SEmtF | GGAATTCATGGAAAAAT GTGCGAGACCGAAC | 48 | 154 |
| SEmtR | CCGCTCGAGTGCAGTT GCACAGCTACAATC |
Table 2: Primer details for amplification of cadD, cadA, and mt. The table lists the forward and reverse primer sequences used for PCR amplification of cadD, cadA, and mt, together with the corresponding annealing temperatures and expected amplicon sizes. *Tan- Annealing temperature for each primer pair applied in the PCR.
Evaluation of kanamycin resistance marker excision from recombinant E. coli MG1655
Following transformation with the pCP20 helper plasmid, ampicillin-resistant colonies were recovered on LB agar supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/mL). Plasmid DNA corresponding to pCP20 was detected following plasmid isolation from representative transformants (Figure 6).

Figure 6: Confirmation of pCP20 transformation into recombinant E. coli MG1655 carrying the chromosomally integrated biosorbent cassette. (A) Ampicillin-resistant transformants following introduction of the pCP20 helper plasmid. (B) Agarose gel electrophoresis confirming the presence of the pCP20 plasmid. Lane 1, isolated pCP20 plasmid (~9.3 kb); lane 2, 10 kb DNA ladder. Abbreviations: DNA = deoxyribonucleic acid; kb = kilobases; E. coli = Escherichia coli. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Following FLP recombinase-mediated marker excision and temperature treatment for pCP20 curing, recombinant colonies were evaluated by antibiotic sensitivity testing. As shown in Figure 7, the tested colonies grew on antibiotic-free LB agar but did not grow on LB agar supplemented with either kanamycin (50 µg/mL) or ampicillin (100 µg/mL). This antibiotic sensitivity phenotype was consistent with loss of kanamycin resistance and loss of ampicillin resistance following the marker-excision and plasmid curing procedure.

Figure 7: Confirmation of flippase-mediated excision of the kanamycin resistance marker and curing of the pCP20 helper plasmid. (A) No bacterial growth on Luria-Bertani agar supplemented with kanamycin (50 µg/mL). (B) No bacterial growth on LB agar supplemented with ampicillin (100 µg/mL). (C) Normal bacterial growth on antibiotic-free LB agar, confirming cell viability following marker excision. Abbreviations: LB = Luria-Bertani; E. coli = Escherichia coli. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Fluorescence microscopy analysis of recombinant E. coli MG1655 carrying the biosorbent construct
Recombinant E. coli MG1655 generated through the chromosomal integration procedure was evaluated for detectable green fluorescence following exposure to Cd2⁺, Zn2⁺, and Pb2⁺ at concentrations ranging from 1 to 1,000 ppm. No detectable green fluorescence was observed in recombinant cells at any of the tested metal concentrations. No fluorescence signal was detected in the all four control samples.
The protocol presented here describes a workflow for constructing a chromosomally integrated, marker-free, multigene recombinant E. coli strain containing genes associated with heavy metal resistance and sequestration. The method combines assembly of a multigene cassette, cloning into the pKIKOArsBKm integration vector, λ Red-mediated chromosomal integration, FLP-FRT-mediated selectable marker excision, molecular evaluation of recombinant colonies, and fluorescence microscopy. The approach was designed to avoid maintenance of the final construct on a multicopy plasmid and to generate a recombinant strain without the kanamycin resistance marker.
Several steps are critical for the successful implementation of this protocol. During λ Red-mediated integration, maintaining the temperature-sensitive pKD46 plasmid at 30 °C before recombination and inducing the λ Red recombination proteins with L-arabinose are important for efficient recombineering16,17. Preparation of electrocompetent E. coli MG1655(pKD46) cells also requires maintaining the cells and washing solutions at low temperature and minimizing residual salts before electroporation. The recombinant pKIKOArsBKm construct should be fully linearized and purified before electroporation, as linear DNA serves as the substrate for λ Red-mediated recombination. The pKIKO integration system has previously been reported to accommodate relatively large DNA inserts and to support efficient chromosomal integration18,19. Following selection, candidate colonies should be evaluated using both plasmid and genomic DNA preparations. In the present study, the absence of detectable plasmid DNA together with amplification of cadD, cadA, and mt from the genomic DNA preparation provided evidence consistent with chromosomal integration. However, these assays alone do not definitively establish the precise genomic integration event. Junction-specific PCR, sequencing across the integration boundaries, or whole-genome sequencing could provide more direct confirmation of the integration site in future applications of the protocol.
Marker excision is another critical component of the method. The FLP-FRT recombination system provides a means of removing selectable antibiotic resistance markers following genome engineering16,20. Following the introduction of the temperature-sensitive pCP20 helper plasmid, transformants are maintained at 30 °C, then incubated at 42 °C to promote FLP-mediated marker excision and loss of pCP20. Colonies should then be evaluated on antibiotic-free, kanamycin-containing, and ampicillin-containing media. Growth on antibiotic-free medium, accompanied by the absence of growth on kanamycin- and ampicillin-containing media, provides a practical screening approach for identifying candidate marker-free colonies following the excision and curing procedure. If antibiotic-resistant colonies remain, additional single-colony purification and temperature-dependent curing may be required before further characterization. The chromosomal integration strategy used here differs from conventional plasmid-based expression methods.
Plasmid systems can provide higher gene copy numbers and may therefore be advantageous when strong recombinant protein expression is required. However, plasmid-based systems can be affected by plasmid segregation, variable copy number, metabolic burden, and dependence on selective pressure for plasmid maintenance. Chromosomal integration eliminates the need to maintain the final biosorbent cassette as an extrachromosomal plasmid and was selected in this protocol to provide a more persistent genetic configuration. Previous studies have described chromosomal integration as an approach for improving genetic maintenance during cell division21,22. However, the long-term genetic stability of the recombinant strain generated in the present study was not directly evaluated. Therefore, improved genetic stability should not be considered an experimentally demonstrated outcome of this protocol. The multigene design is another feature of the method. Rather than introducing a single metal-associated gene, the cassette combines cadA, cadD, and metallothionein (mt) with an Lpp-OmpA surface-display design and a gfp reporter. Previous recombinant bacterial biosorbent strategies have commonly focused on individual metal-binding proteins or resistance determinants11,13,23,24. The modular configuration used here allows multiple genetic components to be incorporated into a single chromosomal integration workflow. The protocol could therefore be adapted for other multigene constructs by modifying the genes, promoter, reporter, or surface-display components according to the intended application. Nevertheless, increasing cassette size and the number of expressed genes may affect recombination efficiency, transcription, translation, and cellular metabolic burden, and should be considered when adapting the method.
An important limitation of the present study is that functional expression of the engineered cassette was not demonstrated under the experimental conditions tested. No detectable GFP fluorescence was observed following exposure of the recombinant cells to Cd2⁺, Zn2⁺, or Pb2⁺. Consequently, the present data do not establish functional expression of the complete multigene cassette or demonstrate heavy metal biosorption by the recombinant strain. Chromosomal integration generally yields lower gene copy numbers than multicopy plasmid systems, and recombinant expression can also be influenced by the genomic insertion site and promoter activity22,25. Cellular responses to heavy metal stress may additionally influence heterologous gene expression26,27. These factors represent possible considerations rather than experimentally established explanations for the absence of detectable fluorescence in the present study. When applying this protocol, the absence of detectable fluorescence should prompt evaluation of culture conditions, metal exposure conditions, promoter activity, and reporter expression. Independent measurements of transcription and protein production would help distinguish inadequate expression from limitations of fluorescence detection. Simultaneous expression of multiple recombinant proteins may also impose additional metabolic demands on the host, particularly under stressful culture conditions28.
These possibilities require direct experimental evaluation before the cause of the absence of detectable GFP fluorescence can be established. The protocol also has limitations in characterizing the final recombinant strain. Gene-specific PCR and the absence of detectable plasmid DNA provide evidence consistent with chromosomal integration but do not establish the precise integration-site sequence or long-term genetic stability. Antibiotic sensitivity provides a practical screen following marker excision but can be supplemented with molecular analysis of the FRT-containing region when more direct confirmation is required. In addition, fluorescence microscopy provides a qualitative assessment of detectable GFP fluorescence but does not substitute for quantitative measurements of transcription or protein abundance. Quantitative reverse-transcription PCR, protein analysis, quantitative fluorescence measurements, and sequencing-based confirmation could therefore strengthen characterization of strains generated using this protocol.
Further optimization and functional characterization are required before the engineered strain can be evaluated as a functional heavy metal biosorbent. Direct measurements of metal uptake or removal are necessary to establish biosorption performance. Protein expression and localization should also be experimentally verified, particularly for the Lpp-OmpA-metallothionein fusion. Long-term passaging experiments would be required to determine whether chromosomal integration provides the expected genetic stability under relevant culture conditions. Marker-free genome engineering may also facilitate subsequent rounds of chromosomal modification without accumulation of multiple selectable markers, providing opportunities for further development of multigene constructs15,27.
Overall, this protocol provides a methodological framework for constructing and evaluating a chromosomally integrated, marker-free, multigene recombinant bacterial strain. Its modular design may be adapted for other combinations of metal-associated genes, reporter systems, or synthetic biology applications. The current work establishes the engineering and screening workflow; functional expression, long-term genetic stability, protein localization, and heavy metal biosorption performance remain to be experimentally validated before conclusions can be drawn regarding environmental or bioremediation applications.
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
This work was supported by a research grant, AP/3/2/2018/CG/33, University of Colombo.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| 0.22 μm membrane filter | ThermoFisher Scientific | 596-3320 | None |
| 1 kb DNA marker | Promega Corporation | G5711 | None |
| 10 kb DNA ladder | N/A | N/A | Molecular size marker used for Figure 6 |
| 100 bp DNA ladder | N/A | N/A | Molecular size marker used for Figure 5 |
| 10X T4 DNA ligase buffer | Promega Corporation | C1263 | None |
| 6× DNA loading buffer | N/A | N/A | Used for agarose gel electrophoresis |
| Agarose | Molecular Designs | A113-3 | None |
| Ammonium acetate | N/A | N/A | Prepared as 7.5 M solution for genomic DNA extraction |
| Ampicillin | ThermoFisher Scientific | J60977.14 | None |
| BamHI restriction enzyme | New England BioLabs | R0136S | None |
| Cadmium chloride | ThermoFisher Scientific | 219141000 | None |
| Calcium chloride | ThermoFisher Scientific | 012316.A7 | None |
| Centrifuge | ThermoFisher Scientific | Heraeus Fresco 21 / 75002478 | None |
| Deionized water | ThermoFisher Scientific | 751-610 | None |
| DNA Safe Stain | Molecular Designs | C138 | None |
| dNTP Mix | Promega Corporation | U1511 | None |
| Electrophoresis equipment | BioRad | 1704405 | None |
| Electroporation cuvette | BioRad | 1652086 | None |
| Electroporator | BioRad | 1652100 | None |
| Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) | University of Colombo, Department of Chemistry | N/A | None |
| Escherichia coli MG1655 | Department of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Japan | N/A | None |
| Escherichia coli Pir1 competent cells | ThermoFisher Scientific | C101010 | None |
| Escherichia coli BL21(DE3) competent cells | ThermoFisher Scientific | C600003 | None |
| Escherichia coli JM109 strain containing pQBIT-GFP-T7 plasmid | Department of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Japan | N/A | None |
| ET Buffer | N/A | N/A | To prepare 1 L of ET buffer, dissolve 6.06 g of Tris base and 3.72 g of EDTA in approximately 800 mL of distilled water. Adjust the pH to the required value using HCl, mix thoroughly, and bring the final volume to 1 L with distilled water |
| Ethanol | ThermoFisher Scientific | T038181000CS | None |
| Ethylenediaminetetraacetic Acid (EDTA) | ThermoFisher Scientific | 17892 | None |
| Fluorescence microscope | Coastal Microscopes | Olympus BX53/ 11679 | None |
| Gel electrophoresis apparatus | Bio Rad | 1704405 | None |
| Glacial acetic acid | MilliporeSigma | PHR1748 | None |
| Glycerol | MilliporeSigma | G5516 | None |
| Guanidine thiocyanate | ThermoFisher Scientific | 433941000 | None |
| Hydrochloric acid (HCl) | MilliporeSigma | 1.00317 | None |
| Kanamycin | ThermoFisher Scientific | 15160054 | None |
| L-Arabinose | ThermoFisher Scientific | 365185000 | None |
| Lead nitrate | ThermoFisher Scientific | 211565000 | None |
| Luria–Bertani (LB) agar | Molecular Designs | C120 | None |
| Luria–Bertani (LB) broth | Molecular Designs | C121 | None |
| Lysis buffer | N/A | N/A | To prepare the lysis buffer, combine the appropriate volumes of 5 M NaOH and 20% (w/v) SDS stock solutions to obtain final concentrations of 0.2 N NaOH and 1% (w/v) SDS. Adjust to the required final volume with distilled water and mix thoroughly. |
| Lysozyme | ThermoFisher Scientific | 89833 | None |
| Magnesium chloride (MgCl2) | N/A | N/A | Used at 1.5 mM final concentration in PCR reactions |
| Neutralization solution | N/A | N/A | Prepare the neutralization buffer, using 3 M potassium acetate and glacial acetic acid. Adjust the solution to the required final volume with distilled water and mix thoroughly. |
| NotI restriction enzyme | New England BioLabs | R0189S | None |
| pCP20 | Department of Life Science and Technology, Institute of Science Tokyo, Yokohama, Japan | N/A | None |
| PCR machine | ThermoFisher Scientific | Applied Biosystems MiniAmp / A37834 | None |
| pET-21a plasmid in E. coli BL21(DE3) | University of Colombo, Department of Chemistry | N/A | None |
| Phosphate buffered saline | MilliporeSigma | P4474 | None |
| pKD46 | Creative Biogene | OVT2612 | None |
| pKIKOArsBKm | Addgene | 46766 | None |
| Potassium acetate | MilliporeSigma | 236497 | None |
| Restriction enzyme buffer | N/A | N/A | Used for restriction enzyme digestion reactions |
| SacI restriction enzyme | New England BioLabs | R0156 | None |
| Shaker incubator | Crystal technology and industries | IS-A6 | None |
| Sodium acetate | ThermoFisher Scientific | A13184.30 | None |
| Sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) | ThermoFisher Scientific | 15525017 | None |
| Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) | MilliporeSigma | 567530 | None |
| Super optimal broth (SOB) medium | MilliporeSigma | H8032 | None |
| Super optimal medium with catabolic repressor (SOC) Media | ThermoFisher Scientific | J60255.AK | None |
| T4 DNA ligase | Promega Corporation | M1801 | None |
| TAE Buffer | ThermoFisher Scientific | B49 | None |
| Taq DNA polymerase | Promega Corporation | M3001 | None |
| TE buffer | MilliporeSigma | 93283 | None |
| TE equilibrated phenol | ThermoFisher Scientific | 15513039 | None |
| Tris base | N/A | N/A | Used to prepare ET buffer |
| Universal PCR buffer | Promega Corporation | M7911 | None |
| UV trans-illuminator | Labexchange | TFX-35M, 021425 | None |
| UV/Visible spectrophotometer | Microbiotests | Jenway 6300, TE15 | None |
| Water bath | ThermoFisher Scientific | TSGP05 | None |
| XhoI restriction enzyme | New England BioLabs | R0146S | None |
| Zinc chloride | ThermoFisher Scientific | A16281.36 | None |
| Primers | |||
| cadD forward primer (SD-EF) | N/A | N/A | 5′-GAATTCATGATTC AGACTATTGTAACTG-3′ |
| cadD reverse primer (SE-XHR) | N/A | N/A | 5′-CTCGAGAAATATAA ATCCTAAAATTGTTTG-3′ |
| cadA forward primer (PD-BF) | N/A | N/A | 5′-GGATCCGACACAAT GAAACACGAAGA-3′ |
| cadA reverse primer (PF-XHR) | N/A | N/A | 5′-CCGCTCGAGCGGCA TGTAATTTTTCATTTTGA GTAAGCGAAG-3′ |
| mt forward primer (SEmtF) | N/A | N/A | 5′-GGAATTCATGGAAAAAT GTGCGAGACCGAAC-3′ |
| mt reverse primer (SEmtR) | N/A | N/A | 5′-CCGCTCGAGTGCAGTTG CACAGCTACAATC-3′ |
| Software/Tool Name | Version/Server | URL | Access date |
| ExPASy tools | TMPRED Server | https://embnet.vital-it.ch/cgi-bin/TMPRED_form_parser | 30-01-2023 |
| ExPASy Translate | ExPASy Translation Tool | https://web.expasy.org/translate/ | N/A |
| I-TASSER | N/A | https://zhanggroup.org/I-TASSER/ | 24-02-2023 |
| NCBI GenBank | GenBank database | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/genbank/ | N/A |
| SnapGene | v.7.1.2 | N/A | N/A |
| TMHMM | v. 2.0 | https://services.healthtech.dtu.dk/services/TMHMM-2.0/ | 16-01-2023 |