Determination of 0.25% chymotrypsin as the optimal modeling concentration
Aortic diameters at different time points, cumulative aneurysm incidence and mortality across all pilot groups were shown in Supplementary Table 1. In the PBS group, no aortic dilation or AAA formation was observed at days 7, 14, or 28. The PPE group achieved AAA formation rates of 20% (1/5), 60% (3/5), and 60% (3/5) at days 7, 14, and 28, respectively.
All chymotrypsin concentrations induced aortic dilation. The 0.125% subgroup produced AAA in 40% (2/5) of mice at day 7 and 100% (5/5) at days 14 and 28. The 0.25% subgroup achieved AAA rates of 60% (3/5) at day 7 and 100% (5/5) at both days 14 and 28, with mean aortic diameters of 2.01 ± 0.41 mm and 2.01 ± 0.45 mm at days 14 and 28, respectively. Although 0.375% chymotrypsin also achieved 100% modeling at days 14 and 28, it was associated with 40% (2/5) mortality. Balancing modeling efficiency, dilation magnitude, and animal welfare, 0.25% chymotrypsin was selected for the main study.
Perivascular sheath injection of 0.25% chymotrypsin stably and efficiently induces AAA
In the main study, a total of 75 mice were included and randomly assigned: 25 in the PBS group, 25 in the PPE group and 25 in the chymotrypsin group, respectively. AAA was defined as a ≥50% increase in maximal aortic diameter relative to baseline. Baseline aortic diameters showed no significant inter-group differences prior to intervention (PBS: 0.59 ± 0.09 mm; PPE: 0.60 ± 0.06 mm; chymotrypsin: 0.59 ± 0.05 mm; all P > 0.05). Serial Doppler ultrasonography revealed progressive aortic dilation in PPE group and chymotrypsin group, whereas the aortic diameter remained unchanged in the PBS group throughout the observation period (Figure 2A). At day 7, both the PPE and chymotrypsin groups developed significant aortic dilation relative to PBS controls (0.89 ± 0.16 mm and 0.92 ± 0.22 mm vs. 0.63 ± 0.11 mm; both P < 0.001), whereas aortic diameter was comparable between the two model groups (P = 0.851). At day 14, aortic dilation was substantially greater in the chymotrypsin group (2.37 ± 0.36 mm) than in the PPE group (1.47 ± 0.58 mm) and PBS controls (0.66 ± 0.08 mm; both P < 0.001). At day 28, the chymotrypsin group maintained markedly enlarged aortic diameters (2.14 ± 0.32 mm) compared with the PPE group (1.32 ± 0.56 mm) and PBS group (0.66 ± 0.05 mm; both P < 0.001; Figure 2B). Representative gross images of aortas harvested at day 14 confirmed the pronounced focal dilation in the chymotrypsin group, consistent with the ultrasound findings (Figure 2A). At day 7, AAA formation rates were 40% (10/25) in the PPE group and 44% (11/25) in the chymotrypsin group (P = 0.774). At day 14 and 28, all evaluable mice receiving chymotrypsin developed AAA, yielding a 100% (25/25) AAA formation rate, which was significantly higher than the 64% (16/25) observed in the PPE group (P = 0.003; Figure 2C).
Chymotrypsin injection shortens operative time while yielding comparable intraluminal thrombus formation
At day 28, intraluminal thrombus formation was observed in 37.5% (6/16) of the PPE group and 36% (9/25) of the chymotrypsin group (P = 0.920; Figure 2D). Operative time was significantly shorter for chymotrypsin injection than for PPE application (8.32 ± 0.95 min vs. 35.00 ± 1.58 min; P < 0.001; Figure 2E), demonstrating substantial procedural efficiency without compromising modeling outcomes.
Chymotrypsin-induced AAA exhibits pronounced histological remodeling
H&E staining revealed prominent aortic wall thickening, structural disorganization, and inflammatory infiltration in both PPE- and chymotrypsin-treated aortas relative to PBS controls, with the most severe lesions observed in the chymotrypsin group (Figure 3A). Quantitatively, medial thickness was significantly increased in both modeling groups compared with PBS, without statistical difference between the PPE and chymotrypsin groups (Figure 3B).
Masson’s trichrome staining demonstrated increased collagen deposition in both modeling groups, with the chymotrypsin group exhibiting a significantly higher collagen volume fraction (CVF) than the PPE group (Figure 3C), indicating enhanced fibrotic remodeling. EVG staining revealed intact, continuous medial elastic laminae in PBS controls, whereas both modeling groups showed extensive elastin fragmentation and rarefaction. Quantitatively, elastin content was significantly reduced in both modeling groups compared with PBS, with no significant difference between PPE and chymotrypsin groups (Figure 3D).
Chymotrypsin modeling enhances inflammatory infiltration and ECM-degrading enzyme expression
Immunohistochemical staining was performed to evaluate inflammatory cell infiltration, matrix‑remodeling-related protein expression, and vascular smooth muscle cell phenotype in aortic tissues across the PBS, PPE, and chymotrypsin groups (Figure 4A–F).
The positive area fraction of CD45 was markedly elevated in both the PPE and chymotrypsin groups compared with the PBS group. Moreover, CD45 positive inflammatory cell infiltration was significantly greater in the chymotrypsin group than in the PPE group (P < 0.05; Figure 4B). The positive area fraction of CD68 was substantially increased in the PPE and chymotrypsin groups relative to PBS controls. No statistically significant difference in CD68 positive area fraction was detected between the PPE and chymotrypsin groups (Figure 4C).
Both PPE and chymotrypsin treatment led to robust up-regulation of MMP2 positive area fraction versus PBS. MMP-2 levels were comparable between the two model groups (Figure 4D). For MMP-9, positive staining was significantly higher in the PPE group than in PBS controls, and further increased in the chymotrypsin group compared with the PPE group (P < 0.05; Figure 4E). The α-SMA positive area fraction was high in the PBS group. By contrast, both PPE and chymotrypsin groups exhibited obvious loss of α-SMA signal. There was no significant difference in α-SMA positive area fraction between the PPE and chymotrypsin groups (Figure 4F).

Figure 1: Key surgical procedures for establishing a mouse abdominal aortic aneurysm model by perivascular sheath microinjection of chymotrypsin. (A) The mouse was fixed after abdominal hair removal and skin disinfection. (B) The infrarenal abdominal aorta was exposed through a midline laparotomy; the arrow indicates the target vascular segment. (C) A syringe with a microscale needle was prepared; the arrow indicates the needle tip. (D) Under direct vision, the needle was inserted into the peri-adventitial space surrounding the abdominal aorta. (E) Chymotrypsin working solution was slowly injected to allow local circumferential distribution around the vessel; the arrow indicates the injection site. (F) The abdominal wall was closed layer by layer to complete the procedure. (G) Schematic illustration of the surgical procedure for peri-adventitial sheath injection. This technique enables targeted local delivery via peri-adventitial sheath injection and avoids the prolonged incubation step required in the conventional topical application method. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Morphological development of abdominal aortic aneurysm in the experimental groups. (A) Representative Doppler ultrasound images of the abdominal aorta in the PBS, PPE and chymotrypsin groups at 0, 7, 14, and 28 days after aneurysm induction, together with representative gross images of isolated aortas harvested at day 14. Scale bar = 1 mm. (B) Time-course changes in abdominal aortic diameter in the three groups at 0, 7, 14, and 28 days after aneurysm induction (n = 25/group). Data are estimated marginal means ± SE from a linear mixed-effects model with group, time, and group×time as fixed effects and mouse as a random intercept. Bonferroni-adjusted simple-effects comparisons were performed after a significant group × time interaction. (C) Comparison of AAA incidence at days 7, 14, and 28 after aneurysm induction. AAA was defined as an abdominal aortic diameter increase of at least 50% relative to the preoperative baseline. The difference in AAA formation rate between groups was analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. (D) Proportion of aneurysms with mural thrombus at day 28 in the PPE and chymotrypsin groups. The incidence of intraluminal thrombus was compared between the two groups using Fisher’s exact test. (E) Comparison of operation duration between the two modeling procedures. Operation duration was defined as the time from the first skin incision to completion of the final skin suture, recorded with a stopwatch by a blinded assistant. Differences in operation duration between groups were assessed by the independent samples t-test. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Abbreviations: AAA, abdominal aortic aneurysm; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PPE, porcine pancreatic elastase; Chy, chymotrypsin. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Histopathological evaluation of aortic wall remodeling. (A) Representative histological images of abdominal aortic sections stained with hematoxylin and eosin (HE), Masson’s trichrome, and Verhoeff-Van Gieson (EVG). Low magnification ( ×20, scale bar = 1000 µm) and high magnification (×200, scale bar = 100 µm) views are shown. (B) Quantitative analysis of aortic wall thickness. (C) Quantitative analysis of collagen volume fraction. (D) Quantitative analysis of elastic fiber content. Pathological and immunohistochemical examinations were performed using 5 mice per group. Data are presented as mean ± SD. Multi-group comparisons were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc testing. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Abbreviations: EVG, Verhoeff-Van Gieson; HE, hematoxylin and eosin; PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; Chy, chymotrypsin; PPE, porcine pancreatic elastase.

Figure 4: Immunohistochemical characterization of inflammatory infiltration and matrix remodeling. (A) Representative immunohistochemical staining for CD45, CD68, MMP-2, MMP-9, and α-SMA at ×200 (scale bar = 100 µm) and ×400 (scale bar = 50 µm). (B–F) Quantification of the positive staining area for each marker. Five mice per group were analyzed. Data are shown as mean ± SD. Multi-group comparisons were analyzed by one-way ANOVA with Tukey post hoc testing. ns, not significant; *P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; ***P < 0.001. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Abbreviations: PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PPE, porcine pancreatic elastase; Chy, chymotrypsin.
Supplementary Table 1: Pilot study data for screening the optimal chymotrypsin concentration for aneurysm induction. Data for aortic diameter are presented as mean ± SD. AAA incidence and mortality are expressed as percentage (number of animals/total number of animals assessed). Abdominal aortic diameters were measured by ultrasound before surgery and at 7, 14, and 28 days after aneurysm induction. AAA incidence is reported as cumulative incidence by each postoperative time point and is calculated using the original group size (n = 5). Animals that fulfilled the AAA criterion before death were retained in the cumulative incidence numerator. These data were used to determine the optimal concentration of chymotrypsin for the formal experiments.Please click here to download this file.
NOTE: Data for aortic diameter are presented as mean ± SD. AAA incidence and mortality are expressed as percentage (number of animals/total number of animals assessed). Abdominal aortic diameters were measured by ultrasound before surgery and at 7, 14, and 28 days after aneurysm induction. AAA incidence is reported as cumulative incidence by each postoperative time point and is calculated using the original group size (n = 5). Animals that fulfilled the AAA criterion before death were retained in the cumulative incidence numerator. These data were used to determine the optimal concentration of chymotrypsin for the formal experiments.
Abbreviations: PBS, phosphate-buffered saline; PPE, porcine pancreatic elastase; Chy, chymotrypsin.
Supplementary File 1: Ethical approval document. This file contains the official animal ethics approval issued by the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Fujian Medical University for the experimental procedures described in this study.Please click here to download this file.