Design of a Cyclic Pressure Bioreactor for the Ex Vivo Study of Aortic Heart Valves

Published 8/23/2011
1 Comment

Your institution must subscribe to JoVE's Bioengineering section to access this content.

Fill out the form below to receive a free trial or learn more about access:


Enter your email below to get your free 10 minute trial to JoVE!

By clicking "Submit", you agree to our policies.



A cyclic pressure bioreactor capable of subjecting heart valve tissue to physiological and pathological pressure conditions has been designed. A LabVIEW program allows users to control pressure magnitude, amplitude and frequency. This device can be used to study the mechanobiology of heart valve tissue or isolated cells.

Cite this Article

Copy Citation

Schipke, K. J., Filip To, S. D., Warnock, J. N. Design of a Cyclic Pressure Bioreactor for the Ex Vivo Study of Aortic Heart Valves. J. Vis. Exp. (54), e3316, doi:10.3791/3316 (2011).


The aortic valve, located between the left ventricle and the aorta, allows for unidirectional blood flow, preventing backflow into the ventricle. Aortic valve leaflets are composed of interstitial cells suspended within an extracellular matrix (ECM) and are lined with an endothelial cell monolayer. The valve withstands a harsh, dynamic environment and is constantly exposed to shear, flexion, tension, and compression. Research has shown calcific lesions in diseased valves occur in areas of high mechanical stress as a result of endothelial disruption or interstitial matrix damage1-3. Hence, it is not surprising that epidemiological studies have shown high blood pressure to be a leading risk factor in the onset of aortic valve disease4.

The only treatment option currently available for valve disease is surgical replacement of the diseased valve with a bioprosthetic or mechanical valve5. Improved understanding of valve biology in response to physical stresses would help elucidate the mechanisms of valve pathogenesis. In turn, this could help in the development of non-invasive therapies such as pharmaceutical intervention or prevention. Several bioreactors have been previously developed to study the mechanobiology of native or engineered heart valves6-9. Pulsatile bioreactors have also been developed to study a range of tissues including cartilage10, bone11 and bladder12. The aim of this work was to develop a cyclic pressure system that could be used to elucidate the biological response of aortic valve leaflets to increased pressure loads.

The system consisted of an acrylic chamber in which to place samples and produce cyclic pressure, viton diaphragm solenoid valves to control the timing of the pressure cycle, and a computer to control electrical devices. The pressure was monitored using a pressure transducer, and the signal was conditioned using a load cell conditioner. A LabVIEW program regulated the pressure using an analog device to pump compressed air into the system at the appropriate rate. The system mimicked the dynamic transvalvular pressure levels associated with the aortic valve; a saw tooth wave produced a gradual increase in pressure, typical of the transvalvular pressure gradient that is present across the valve during diastole, followed by a sharp pressure drop depicting valve opening in systole. The LabVIEW program allowed users to control the magnitude and frequency of cyclic pressure. The system was able to subject tissue samples to physiological and pathological pressure conditions. This device can be used to increase our understanding of how heart valves respond to changes in the local mechanical environment.


1. Tissue Harvest and Preparation

  1. Aortic valves should be collected from adult pigs weighing no more than 120 lbs immediately after death.
  2. Wash the valves twice with sterile phosphate buffered saline (PBS) and transport to the laboratory on ice.
  3. All subsequent steps should be performed under sterile conditions.
  4. Ensure that leaflets do not show any sign of degeneration, tearing or calcification. Remove leaflets from the aortic root by cutting 1/3 of the distance from the annulus.
  5. Place leaflets in individual wells of a six well plate and incubate overnight with 3ml Dulbecco's Modified Eagle Medium supplemented with 1% anti-biotic/anti-mycotic solution and 10% fetal bovine serum at 37°C and 5% CO2.
  6. As an alternative, isolated cells can be seeded into six-well culture plates and used in the pressure device. Isolation of valve endothelial cells and interstitial cells can be performed as previously described13, 14.

2. Pressure Studies

  1. A custom-made pressure system has been designed to study the mechanobiological effects of cyclic pressure on aortic valve tissue15.
  2. Log on to the computer and open the labVIEW program (Figure 1).
  3. Calibration:
    1. Prior to experimentation, the system should be properly calibrated.
    2. Connect the power supply to the circuit board. This provides power to the solenoid valves that control the flow of air into and out of the chamber.
    3. Make sure the compressed air is connected to the system and open the air supply to full velocity.
    4. Turn on the signal amplifier. Make sure the voltage reading is 0.00. Adjust as necessary
    5. The labVIEW interface has a switch marked "TEST/RECORD". Make sure the switch is set to "TEST". Click the button marked "Air Supply" to open the inlet solenoid valve.
    6. Using the gas pressure regulator, pressurize the chamber with compressed air at 1 PSI. The pressure in the chamber can be read using the digital pressure gauge located on the rear end-plate of the chamber. Once the pressure has equilibrated, record the voltage reading from the signal amplifier. Repeat for 2, 3, 4 and 5 PSI.
    7. Construct a calibration curve of pressure vs. voltage. Pressure should be converted from PSI to mmHg. The equation from the graph can be placed into the code of the labVIEW program
  4. Remove the aluminum front plate from the pressure chamber and spray the chamber with 70% ethanol. Leave for a minimum of 10 minutes to allow residual ethanol fumes to dissipate.
  5. Place the six-well plate containing the leaflet samples into the chamber and replace the front end plate. Ensure the seal is airtight by tightening the nuts located on the four threaded rods (located at each corner of the end plate) by hand. Place the pressure chamber in the 37°C incubator. A schematic diagram of the pressure chamber is shown in figure 2.
  6. The interface will prompt the user to provide the amount of time the system cycles between compressed air input and output. These should be set to 0.6s and 0.4s to mimic diastolic and systolic conditions, respectively, at a frequency of 1Hz. The user should also enter a data file path.
  7. In labVIEW, click run and switch the "TEST/RECORD" toggle to "RECORD".
  8. Make sure the pressure is at the desired level using the graph on the labVIEW interface. Pressure can be adjusted using the gas pressure regulator.
  9. Run program for desired length of time.
  10. Once the experiment is complete, click the stop button on labVIEW, turn off air supply and open the exhaust valve on the pressure chamber.
  11. Remove the front end plate from the chamber and retrieve six-well plate containing samples. Samples can now be analyzed for gene expression, protein expression, histology, mechanical properties etc.

3. Representative Results:

The pressure system is capable of simulating the maximum transvalvular pressures observed under normotensive, stage I and stage II hypertensive conditions. However, the pressure was not able to mimic the systolic pressure gradient, which is essentially zero in vivo. Frequency is maintained at 1Hz, with an air inlet time of 0.6s and an exhaust time of 0.4s. Representative pressure waveforms of normal and elevated pressure conditions obtained from the system can be seen in figure 3.

Figure 1
Figure 1: Screen shot of the LabVIEW interface.

Figure 2
Figure 2: Schematic drawing of the pressure chamber A. Isometric view of pressure chamber; B. Side view of pressure chamber; C. Top view of pressure chamber.

Figure 3
Figure 3: Graph of pressure simulation within the pressure chamber at (A) normotensive, (B) Stage I hypertensive, and (C) Stage II hypertensive conditions.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


The pressure system successfully exposed aortic valve leaflets to cyclic pressures that were representative of diastolic transvalvular pressure. However, it was not able to mimic systolic transvalvular pressure, as the pressure only dropped to 40 mmHg. Transvalvular pressure is the difference between pressure in the ascending aorta and the left ventricle. During diastole, when the valve is closed, the pressure difference is 80mmHg under normotensive conditions and 90 mmHg and 100mmHg in stage I and stage II hypertension, respectively. During systole, when the valve is open, the pressure difference between the left ventricle and the ascending aorta is zero. The cellular changes that occur in aortic valve disease are believed to be associated with high diastolic pressure; therefore, the fact the pressure did not fall to zero may not be a major concern. This is based on the assumption that it is pressure magnitude and not pressure amplitude that is the driving force behind biological responses. Reducing the pressure from 100 mmHg to 0 mmHg requires 1.20 ± 0.04s, reported from data analysis of 20 pressure cycles. Since the amount of time the aortic valve is closed is approximately 2/3 of the cardiac cycle, the influx of air into the pressure chamber would require 2.4s to create the same balance of valve opening and closing experienced in physiological conditions. As a result, a frequency of 0.28 Hz would be used for testing the effects of both systolic and diastolic transvalvular pressure levels on aortic valve mechanobiology. However, if both systolic and diastolic transvalvular pressure are to be simulated at a physiological frequency of 1 Hz, a vacuum pump and reservoir could be fitted to the exhaust solenoid valve. The vacuum pump could be set to remove a fixed amount of pressure so when the exhaust valve opens, the amount of air required to completely reduce the pressure from the set pressure level would be drawn into the vacuum reservoir. The removal of the pressure would create a 0 mmHg environment, synonymous with systolic transvalvular pressure. Conversely, when the exhaust valve closes, the vacuum will no longer affect the chamber and would allow the pressure to increase via pressurized air. Besides using a vacuum pump to closer mimic physiological conditions, an exhaust valve with a larger diameter can be used to drop the pressure within the bioreactor more quickly. Currently, the 3/8" diameter exhaust solenoid valve has a flow rate of 3.3 gallons per minute (at 60°F, specific gravity of 1); whereas, an exhaust valve with a 2" diameter has a flow rate of 28.0 gallons per minute. A larger diameter solenoid valve is more cost effective than using a vacuum pump, however it may not be able to drop the pressure completely to zero within physiological range and should therefore be investigated further. Alternatively, several solenoid valves triggered by the same control circuit that open simultaneously could be added, thereby "parallel-processing" the gas outflow.

The system could be operated continuously using in-house compressed air. Previous studies have shown that acute changes in gene and protein expression can occur within two hours16, 17. However, this duration may not be sufficient to study transient gene/protein expression or changes in cellular phenotype as a result of mechanical stress. The drawback of using compressed air is that the gas does not contain 5% CO2, which is important for controlling the pH of the culture medium. This can be overcome by adding hepes buffer to the medium. Also, cells produce CO2 as a metabolic waste product. Secretion of CO2 from the tissue will also prevent the medium becoming basic.

In addition to testing aortic valves at varying pressures, it may be prudent to study the effects of varying frequencies as well. For example, the effects of changes in heart rate before, during, and after surgery could elucidate changes in protein expression within the valve. Postoperative arrhythmias occur in up to 20% of patients18-21. The LabVIEW program used for this system allows the user to choose the length of time air enters and leaves the chamber; therefore, the frequency of the cycle can easily be adjusted. The device allows for a maximum frequency of 1.5Hz (90bpm) due to the amount of time required to exhaust the pressure from the chamber. As seen in Figure 3, a major pressure decrease occurred in the first 0.2s after exhaust valve activation, then gradually declined to the residual pressure for the remaining 0.2s of exhaust. The average pressure drop in the initial 0.2s of exhaust was 45.8 ± 0.34mmHg, measured over 20 pressure cycles. Given that testing Stage II hypertensive conditions only requires cycling pressure between at least 60-100 mmHg, a frequency of 1.5 Hz allows 0.22s for exhaust, which is ample time to drop 40 mmHg of pressure. If a vacuum pump is attached to the exhaust valve, it could facilitate a faster drop in pressure and would allow higher frequency testing. The minimum frequency of the bioreactor is not limited, however, because the pressure regulator could allow slow influx of air and the exhaust valve would have sufficient time to drop the pressure within the reactor.

In conclusion, a sterile culture system has been constructed to allow the ex vivo study of porcine aortic heart valve mechanobiology. The pressure within the bioreactor cycled between diastolic transvalvular pressure levels for physiological and pathological conditions. To meet system requirements, the bioreactor was compact and could therefore be contained within a humidified incubator to maintain tissue temperature at 37°C. Furthermore, the pressure magnitude and frequency were controlled independently, allowing a wide range of conditions to be studied.

Subscription Required. Please recommend JoVE to your librarian.


No conflicts of interest declared.


The authors are grateful to Shad Schipke and Daniel Chesser for their assistance with the design and fabrication of the system and Valtresa Myles for assistance with preparing the manuscript.


Name Company Catalog Number Comments
DMEM Sigma-Aldrich D5671
Dulbecco’s PBS Sigma-Aldrich D5652
Anti-mycotic/antibiotic solution Sigma-Aldrich A5955
Fetal Bovine Serum Thermo Fisher Scientific, Inc. SH30070
Viton diaphragm solenoid valves McMaster-Carr 4868K11
Pressure Transducer Omega Engineering, Inc. PX302-200GV
Load cell conditioner Encore Electronics, Inc. 4025-101
Data Acquisition (DAQ) Module Measurement Computing PMD1608



  1. Freeman, R. V., Otto, C. M. Spectrum of calcific aortic valve disease: pathogenesis, disease progression, and treatment strategies. Circulation. 111, 3316-3326 (2005).
  2. Robicsek, F., Thubrikar, M. J., Fokin, A. A. Cause of degenerative disease of the trileaflet aortic valve: review of subject and presentation of a new theory. Ann Thorac Surg. 73, 1346-1354 (2002).
  3. Thubrikar, M. J., Aouad, J., Nolan, S. P. Patterns of calcific deposits in operatively excised stenotic or purely regurgitant aortic valves and their relation to mechanical stress. Am J Cardiol. 58, 304-308 (1986).
  4. Agno, F. S., Chinali, M., Bella, J. N., Liu, J. E., Arnett, D. K., Kitzman, D. W. Aortic valve sclerosis is associated with preclinical cardiovascular disease in hypertensive adults: the Hypertension Genetic Epidemiology Network study. J Hypertens. 23, 867-8673 (2005).
  5. Cawley, P. J., Otto, C. M. Prevention of calcific aortic valve stenosis - fact or fiction. Annals of Medicine. 41, 100-108 (2009).
  6. Durst, C. A., Grande-Allen, J. K. Design and physical characterization of a synchronous multivalve aortic valve culture system. Ann Biomed Eng. 38, 319-3125 (2010).
  7. Engelmayr, G. C., Soletti, L., Vigmostad, S. C., Budilarto, S. G., Federspiel, W. J., Chandran, K. B. A novel flex-stretch-flow bioreactor for the study of engineered heart valve tissue mechanobiology. Ann Biomed Eng. 36, 700-712 (2008).
  8. Sucosky, P., Padala, M., Elhammali, A., Balachandran, K., Jo, H., Yoganathan, A. P. Design of an ex vivo culture system to investigate the effects of shear stress on cardiovascular tissue. J Biomech Eng. 130, 035001-03 (2008).
  9. Syedain, Z. H., Tranquillo, R. T. Controlled cyclic stretch bioreactor for tissue-engineered heart valves. Biomaterials. 30, 4078-4084 (2009).
  10. Lagana, K., Moretti, M., Dubini, G., Raimondi, M. T. A new bioreactor for the controlled application of complex mechanical stimuli for cartilage tissue engineering. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 222, 705-715 (2008).
  11. Wartella, K. A., Wayne, J. S. Bioreactor for biaxial mechanical stimulation to tissue engineered constructs. J Biomech Eng. 131, 044501-044501 (2009).
  12. Wallis, M. C., Yeger, H., Cartwright, L., Shou, Z., Radisic, M., Haig, J. Feasibility study of a novel urinary bladder bioreactor. Tissue Eng Part A. 14, 339-348 (2008).
  13. Butcher, J. T., Nerem, R. M. Valvular endothelial cells regulate the phenotype of interstitial cells in co-culture: effects of steady shear stress. Tissue Eng. 12, 905-915 (2006).
  14. Metzler, S. A., Pregonero, C. A., Butcher, J. T., Burgess, S. C., Warnock, J. N. Cyclic Strain Regulates Pro-Inflammatory Protein Expression in Porcine Aortic Valve Endothelial Cells. J Heart Valve Dis. 17, 571-578 (2008).
  15. Schipke, K. J. Design of a cyclic pressure bioreactor for the ex vivo study of aortic heart valve mechanobiology. Mississippi State University. Mississippi State. (2008).
  16. Smith, K. E., Metzler, S. A., Warnock, J. N. Cyclic strain inhibits acute pro-inflammatory gene expression in aortic valve interstitial cells. Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology. (2009).
  17. Warnock, J. N., Burgess, S. C., Shack, A., Yoganathan, A. P. Differential immediate-early gene responses to elevated pressure in porcine aortic valve interstitial cells. J Heart Valve Dis. 15, 34-41 (2006).
  18. Brathwaite, D., Weissman, C. The new onset of atrial arrhythmias following major noncardiothoracic surgery is associated with increased mortality. Chest. 114, 462-468 (1998).
  19. Walsh, S. R., Oates, J. E., Anderson, J. A., Blair, S. D., Makin, C. A., Walsh, C. J. Postoperative arrhythmias in colorectal surgical patients: incidence and clinical correlates. Colorectal Dis. 8, 212-216 (2006).
  20. Walsh, S. R., Tang, T., Gaunt, M. E., Schneider, H. J. New arrhythmias after non-cardiothoracic surgery. BMJ. 7, 333-333 (2006).
  21. Walsh, S. R., Tang, T., Wijewardena, C., Yarham, S. I., Boyle, J. R., Gaunt, M. E. Postoperative arrhythmias in general surgical patients. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 89, 91-95 (2007).


1 Comment

  1. Thanks for the detailed information to me it is very helpful.

    Mitral Valve

    Posted by: Anonymous
    November 1, 2011 - 2:06 AM

Post a Question / Comment / Request

You must be signed in to post a comment. Please or create an account.

Video Stats