Tail Pressure Test
Tail Pressure Test - Related Videos
08:54
Measuring Blood Pressure in Mice using Volume Pressure Recording, a Tail-cuff Method
0 Views •
Cited by 175 •
2009
The CODA 8-Channel High Throughput Non-Invasive Blood Pressure system measures the blood pressure in up to 8 mice or rats simultaneously. This tail-cuff system uses Volume Pressure Recording (VPR) to measure the blood pressure by determining the tail blood volume.
10:17
The Tail Suspension Test
0 Views •
Cited by 534 •
2012
The tail-suspension test is validated as an experimental procedure to assess antidepressant efficacy of drug treatments in mice. Mice are suspended by their tails for six minutes and escape-related behaviors are assessed. We describe procedures used in conducting the tail suspension test.
07:26
Synthesis and Microdiffraction at Extreme Pressures and Temperatures
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2013
The laser heated diamond anvil cell combined with synchrotron micro-diffraction techniques allows researchers to explore the nature and properties of new phases of matter at extreme pressure and temperature (PT) conditions. Heterogeneous samples can be characterized in situ under high pressure by 2D mapping and combined powder, single-crystal and multigrain diffraction approaches.
07:11
Sampling Blood from the Lateral Tail Vein of the Rat
0 Views •
Cited by 82 •
2015
Blood samples are useful for assessing biomarkers of physiological states or disease in vivo. Here we describe the methodology to sample blood from the lateral tail vein in the rat. This method provides rapid samples with minimal pain and invasiveness.
03:21
Murine Tail Lymphedema Model: An In Vivo Technique to Generate Sustained Lymphedema in Murine Tail
0 Views •
2025
This video describes an in vivo technique to generate murine tail lymphedema, an abnormal fluid accumulation in the interstitial tissue space leading to swelling in the tail. The model is applied to study mechanisms and therapy for lymphedema.
FAQs
Withdrawal threshold identifies the amount of mechanical force required to provoke a response, whereas response latency records how long the animal takes to withdraw after pressure is applied. These measures describe related but distinct aspects of nociceptive sensitivity. Selecting or comparing them helps pharmacological studies characterize whether treatment changes the force tolerance, response timing, or both.
An increased tolerance means that greater mechanical force is required before the withdrawal response occurs. In the context of drug testing, this change indicates analgesic activity because treatment has reduced the measured sensitivity to the pressure stimulus. Comparing the magnitude of this shift across treatments supports evaluation of relative drug effects on mechanically evoked nociception.
The assay provides a common behavioral outcome for comparing opioid and nonopioid analgesics: the change in pressure tolerance or response latency after treatment. Because the stimulus targets mechanical nociception, results can help distinguish differences in drug efficacy and support investigation of how pharmacological interventions alter pain processing in laboratory animals.
Testing pharmacological treatments across doses allows investigators to examine whether analgesic activity changes with dose rather than relying on a single treatment level. Recording withdrawal thresholds or response latencies before and after each treatment provides the measurements needed to compare the size of drug-related effects and characterize differences in efficacy.
A typical experiment records a pretreatment measurement, applies calibrated pressure gradually to the tail, and records the resulting withdrawal threshold or response latency. The pharmacological treatment is then evaluated by measuring the same behavioral outcome afterward. This before-and-after arrangement allows the observed change to be related to the treatment rather than to a single measurement alone.
Calibration establishes a defined mechanical stimulus, while gradual application permits determination of the force or timing associated with withdrawal. Together, these conditions make the behavioral measurement interpretable across pretreatment and post-treatment assessments. They are especially important when comparing analgesic effects, because uncontrolled stimulus delivery could obscure differences in nociceptive sensitivity.
Researchers can use the assay when they need to screen analgesic candidates, compare opioid and nonopioid drug efficacy, or evaluate dose-related changes in mechanical nociception. Its measurements also support studies of pain processing by showing how a pharmacological treatment changes withdrawal behavior after calibrated pressure is applied to the tail.