$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
There is currently great interest in employing strong, polarizable metal-sulfur (e.g., metal-thiolate) links for constructing open framework materials with enhanced electrocatalytic and conductive properties1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10. In addition to promoting electronic interaction and transport in the extended state, the soft and covalent metal-sulfur links also impart better stability for applications in aqueous environments. Among the sulfur-equipped building blocks, symmetrical, multidentate polycyclic aromatic building blocks like 2,3,6,7,10,11-triphenylene hexathiol (HTT)9,11,12,13,14 not only supply highly polarizable π-electrons, but also offer distinct advantages with respect to framework design and synthesis. First, the rigid and symmetrical triphenylene core, in conjunction with the chelating dithiolene groups of HTT, serves to lock in metal ions in regular bonding motifs, simplifying the structural prediction of the prospective network7,15. Together with the rigid and open geometry of the sulfur linker, framework structures with substantial porosity features can often be achieved in the solid state.
One major challenge in assembling thiol-equipped metal orangic framework (MOF) materials is rooted in the synthesis of the organic linker molecules. In a classical protocol, the thiol group had to be derived from the phenol group using the Newman-Kwart rearrangement of the O-aryl thiocarbamate precursor16,17,18. This approach, however, involves elaborate preparative steps for the phenol precursor molecule as well as potential complications of a high-temperature solid phase transformation. Another way of making thiols utilizes reductive dealkylation of thioethers under the harsh conditions of, for example, sodium metal in liquid ammonia19,20,21,22, and is not compatible with the carboxyl and many other donor functions for network construction.
By comparison, the protocol presented here has multiple advantages: safety, convenience, cost-effectiveness, and compatibility with other functional groups (e.g., carbonitrile and pyridinyl). By vigorously heating the generally inexpensive aromatic halide (e.g., hexabromotriphenylene) and thiomethoxide anion, the thiolate anion was generated (via the methyl thioether intermediate product) and then acylated to give the stable and easy-to-handle thioester product-all in one pot.
We will also describe a procedure for utilizing the thioester molecules as the masked form of the thiol linkers for accessing a single-crystalline semiconducting and porous metal-dithiolene network. Unlike the highly reactive free-standing thiols, which tend to decompose and complicate the crystallization of metal-thiolate open frameworks, the thioester can be readily cleaved (e.g., by NaOH or ethylenediamine) in situ to provide the thiol species, serving to mitigate the reaction between the mercaptan units and the metal centers, and to consequently improve the crystallization.
This protocol of preparing thiol/thioester has not been widely used by other groups for the emerging field of metal-sulfur frameworks, even though nucleophilic dealkylations of alkyl aryl thioethers by thiolate anions have already been well documented by organic chemists23,24,25,26. By showcasing this efficient synthetic method for thioesters and their use for facilitating the crystallization of metal-sulfur networks, we wish to promote further efforts to bridge the intellectual and practical divide between synthetic organic chemistry and solid state chemistry, so as to help the speedy and healthy development of porous frameworks.