Here, we present a protocol to perform a modified laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy using improved techniques and instruments.
方法文章
* These authors contributed equally
Here, we present a protocol to perform a modified laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy using improved techniques and instruments.
Laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy (LAH) has become increasingly prevalent worldwide in recent years. However, LAH remains a challenging procedure due to the anatomical characteristics of the liver, with intraoperative hemorrhage being a primary concern. Intraoperative blood loss is the leading cause of conversion to open surgery; therefore, effective management of bleeding and hemostasis is crucial for a successful LAH.
The two-surgeon technique is proposed as an alternative to the traditional single-surgeon approach, with potential benefits in reducing intraoperative bleeding during laparoscopic hepatectomy. However, there remains a lack of evidence to determine which mode of the two-surgeon technique yields superior patient outcomes. Besides, to our knowledge, the LAH technique, which involves the use of a cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) by the primary surgeon while an ultrasonic dissector by the second surgeon, has been rarely reported before.
Herein, we present a modified, two-surgeon LAH technique, wherein one surgeon employs a CUSA while the other uses an ultrasonic dissector. This technique is combined with a simple extracorporeal Pringle maneuver and low central venous pressure (CVP) approach. In this modified technique, the primary and secondary surgeons utilize a laparoscopic CUSA and an ultrasonic dissectorconcurrently to achieve precise and expeditious hepatectomy. A simple extracorporeal Pringle maneuver, combined with the maintenance of low CVP, is employed to regulate the hepatic inflow and outflow in order to minimize intraoperative bleeding. This approach facilitates the attainment of a dry and clean operative field, which allows for the precise ligation and dissection of blood vessels and bile ducts. The modified LAH procedure is simpler and safer due to its effective control over bleeding as well as the seamless transition between the roles of primary and secondary surgeons. It holds great promise for future clinical applications.
The safety of hepatectomy has significantly improved in recent decades1, and with the rapid advancements in diagnostic imaging, energy devices, and surgical techniques, laparoscopic hepatectomy has become a widely performed procedure that yields favorable clinical outcomes2,3. Studies have demonstrated that anatomical hepatectomy yields superior outcomes compared to nonanatomic resection in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma4,5. Consequently, laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy (LAH) has gained popularity worldwide6. However, intraoperative hemorrhage remains the primary concern during liver resection procedures-in laparoscopic and open surgeries involving both anatomic and nonanatomic resection7. Besides, intraoperative hemorrhage is the primary cause for conversion from laparoscopic surgery to open surgery during parenchymal transection8,9. To effectively control and minimize intraoperative bleeding, it is widely recommended to maintain the central venous pressure (CVP) below 5 cmH2O in patients undergoing hepatectomy10,11. Additionally, various instruments, such as a cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA) and an ultrasonic dissector have been utilized12,13, and numerous liver resection techniques, including the liver hanging maneuver14, Pringle maneuver15,16, and the "two-surgeon technique"17,18, have also been documented.
The Pringle maneuver, first reported in 190819, represents the most straightforward technique for hepatic inflow occlusion and is currently readily achievable during laparoscopic hepatectomy with high efficacy20,21.
The two-surgeon technique, proposed as an alternative to the traditional single-surgeon approach, was initially employed in open liver resections17. This method blurs the division of labor between primary and secondary surgeons, with both participating concurrently during parenchymal transection, as well as hemostasis using different energy instruments. Studies have shown that this technique can reduce operation time and intraoperative complications18,22. Takahisa et al. provided us with some recommendations for performing the two-surgeon laparoscopic technique23, but different centers may select different devices to transect the liver parenchymal tissue, and there remains a lack of evidence to demonstrate which mode of the two-surgeon technique yields superior patient outcomes.
The CUSA, a commonly used device in liver resection, employs ultrasonic energy to fragment and aspirate parenchymal tissue, thereby allowing for precision transection with minimal damage to blood vessels and bile ducts13. Another frequently used tool is the ultrasonic dissector, which utilizes the vibrations of two blades to disrupt hydrogen bonds and effectively cut liver parenchyma while coagulating small vessels ≤3 mm in diameter13.
In July 2020, our center implemented the two-surgeon technique for the first time. One surgeon used a CUSA while the other used an ultrasonic dissector. This was combined with a simple extracorporeal Pringle maneuver and low CVP technique to treat a 54-year-old female patient who had been experiencing liver mass and an increased serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) level of 104 ng/mL for 1 week. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) (Figure 1A,B) indicated a tumor measuring about 2 cm in size located in the S5 and S8 segments, which was considered the primary hepatocellular carcinoma. This article presents the protocol of our center's experience with the CUSA-ultrasonic dissector-extracorporeal Pringle maneuver technique.
访问受限。请登录或开始试用以查看此内容。
This protocol and surgery video demonstration obtained the patient's informed consent before surgery, and also obtained approval from The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University.
1. Preoperative preparation
2. Patient inclusion and exclusion criteria
3. Surgery
NOTE: As the preoperative MRI revealed that most of the tumor was located in the S5, with a small portion located in the ventral segment of S8 and without any adjacent large blood vessels or bile ducts, S5 and partial S8 removal was planned to ensure a wide resection margin for complete tumor removal. Therefore, ligation of both S5 pedicles and the ventral branches of the S8 pedicles, as well as their branch veins draining into the middle hepatic vein, was planned. The resection was then performed by dissecting the ventral branch of the S8 segment and following along the hepatic pedicle of the S5.
4. Postoperative follow-up
访问受限。请登录或开始试用以查看此内容。
This 54-year-old female patient underwent a successful total laparoscopic anatomic hepatectomy (S5 + S8v) using the CUSA-ultrasonic dissector-extracorporeal Pringle maneuver technique, resulting in favorable perioperative outcomes. During the operation, a total of four extracorporeal Pringle maneuvers were performed to control and minimize intraoperative bleeding. The operation lasted approximately 145 min, with an estimated blood loss of 150 mL. The patient made a rapid recovery, being d...
访问受限。请登录或开始试用以查看此内容。
The protocol details a modified LAH performed in our center using the CUSA-ultrasonic dissector-extracorporeal Pringle maneuver technique. In this modified combination technique, we used both the simple extracorporeal Pringle maneuver and a low CVP technique to control and minimize intraoperative bleeding. The primary and secondary surgeons concurrently used a laparoscopic CUSA and ultrasonic dissector, respectively, during parenchymal transection and hemostasis to acquire precise and expeditious hepatectomy.
访问受限。请登录或开始试用以查看此内容。
The authors report no conflict of interest.
This work was supported by grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 81971773).
访问受限。请登录或开始试用以查看此内容。
| 姓名 | 公司 | 目录编号 | 评论 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1.0 可吸收缝合线 | Ethicon Inc | SN2210023642 | 无菌,辐射灭菌,一次性 |
| 1.0 不可吸收缝合线 | Ethicon Inc | SF1AN | 无菌,辐射灭菌,一次性 |
| 10 毫米穿刺 | 杭州光电设备医疗有限公司 | 121-01715 | 无菌,环氧乙烷灭菌,一次性 |
| 12 毫米穿刺器 | 杭州光电设备医疗有限公司 | 121-01715 | 无菌,环氧乙烷灭菌,一次性 |
| 5 毫米穿刺器 | 杭州光电设备医疗有限公司 | 121-01715 | 无菌,环氧乙烷灭菌,一次性 |
| 7.0 不可吸收缝合线 | Ethicon Inc | SF7AN | 无菌,辐射灭菌,一次性 |
| 穿刺器 | 杭州康吉医疗仪器有限公司 | 20172080644 | 无菌、干热灭菌、可重复使用 |
| 的无线超声波解剖 | Covidien llc | SCD396 | 无菌、环氧乙烷灭菌、一次性 |
| CUSA | INTEGRA | HDA1902805IE | 无菌、干热灭菌、可重复使用 |
| 电凝固钩 | 浙江舒友仪器设备有限公司 | IIIA-D003-SG842 | 无菌、环氧乙烷灭菌、一次性使用 |
| Endo-GIA吻合器 | 江苏冠创医疗科技有限公司 | GCJQB-160 | 无菌、环氧乙烷灭菌、一次性 |
| 使用内窥镜标本袋 | 青岛华仁医疗用品有限公司 | 20192060113 | 无菌、环氧乙烷灭菌、一次性使用 |
| Hem-o-lok | 浙江维都医疗器械有限公司 | JY1004-2012003 | 无菌、环氧乙烷灭菌、一次性 |
| 使用腹腔镜超声 | BK 医用 | 柔性 Focus 800 | 无菌、干热灭菌、可重复使用 |
| Lumir 装置(改良的 Pringle作) | 上海切斯特医疗科技有限公司 | 016651477 | 无菌、干热灭菌、可重复使用 |
| Surgicel(可吸收止血剂) | Ethicon Inc | LAB0011179V3 | 无菌、辐射灭菌, 一次性使用 |
| 维瑞斯针 | 杭州康吉医疗器械有限公司 | 20172080644 | 无菌, 环氧乙烷灭菌, 一次性 |
访问受限。请登录或开始试用以查看此内容。
申请许可以重复使用本 JoVE 文章的文本或图表
申请许可