Trauma Splint Removal
Trauma Splint Removal - Related Videos
10:08
Pseudofracture: An Acute Peripheral Tissue Trauma Model
0 Views •
Cited by 38 •
2011
Pseudofracture, a reproducible murine model of sterile musculoskeletal trauma, allows for evaluation of late term post-traumatic immune responses. This article describes the procedural execution of the model step by step, including the potential for experimental model combinations to permit study of multiple trauma.
11:14
Acute Brain Trauma in Mice Followed By Longitudinal Two-photon Imaging
0 Views •
Cited by 11 •
2014
Acute brain trauma is a severe injury that has no adequate treatment to date. Multiphoton microscopy allows studying longitudinally the process of acute brain trauma development and probing therapeutical strategies in rodents. Two models of acute brain trauma studied with in vivo two-photon imaging of brain are demonstrated in this protocol.
07:01
Direct Mouse Trauma/Burn Model of Heterotopic Ossification
0 Views •
Cited by 68 •
2015
An Achilles tenotomy and burn injury model of heterotopic ossification allows for the reliable study of trauma induced ectopic bone formation without the application of exogenous factors.
09:55
Use of a Psychophysiological Script-driven Imagery Experiment to Study Trauma-related Dissociation in Borderline Personality Disorder
0 Views •
Cited by 6 •
2018
We present a protocol of personalized script-driven trauma-related imagery and clinical assessments within a comparison design for investigating peritraumatic dissociation (PD), psychophysiological reactions, i.e. heart rate (HR) and skin conductance (SC), and psychological features of often severely traumatized individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD).
07:18
Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) Exam: Image Acquisition
0 Views •
Cited by 7 •
2023
The Focused Assessment with Sonography for Trauma (FAST) exam is a diagnostic point-of-care ultrasound examination used to screen for the presence of free fluid in the pericardium and peritoneum. Indications, techniques, and pitfalls of the procedure are discussed in this article.
FAQs
Timing depends on whether reassessment suggests healing has progressed enough to tolerate less protection, not simply on elapsed time. Pain, swelling, tenderness, stability, skin condition, and distal neurovascular function provide clinical evidence. If findings remain concerning, clinicians may continue immobilization; if they are reassuring, removal can support evaluation and movement while avoiding unnecessary restriction.
Distal neurovascular function is reassessed before and during the change because the clinician needs to monitor the injured area as support is reduced. A concerning finding can indicate that removal should not proceed as planned or that further evaluation is needed. Including this check helps identify complications that might otherwise be missed during a purely mechanical removal.
Incomplete healing does not necessarily call for complete discontinuation of support. Depending on the reassessment, a clinician may loosen the splint, continue immobilization, or select a different form of support. This approach preserves protection for an unstable or still-tender injury while allowing the care team to respond to current findings rather than relying on a fixed removal plan.
Before removal, clinicians reassess pain, swelling, tenderness, stability, skin condition, and distal neurovascular function. These findings establish whether the injured area can tolerate a change in support and whether pressure-related skin problems or other complications are present. The assessment also helps determine whether repeat imaging, rehabilitation, continued immobilization, or another support strategy is appropriate.
The process begins with a focused reassessment, followed by removal or loosening while the injured area remains supported. Clinicians monitor the patient and the affected site for changes or complications during the transition, then decide on the next form of care. Depending on the findings, that plan may include continued protection, repeat imaging, rehabilitation, or different support.
After the splint is removed, clinicians can reassess stability, tenderness, skin condition, pain, swelling, and distal neurovascular function without the same temporary restraint. The results help distinguish a patient who may progress toward rehabilitation from one who still needs protection or additional evaluation. This also supports efforts to limit stiffness, muscle weakness, pressure-related skin injury, and loss of function.