Anti-saccade Task
Anti-saccade Task - Related Videos
11:45
Piaget's Conservation Task and the Influence of Task Demands
0 Views •
2023
Source: Laboratories of Judith Danovitch and Nicholaus Noles—University of Louisville Jean Piaget was a pioneer in the field of developmental psychology, and his theory of cognitive development is one of the most well-known psychological theories. At the heart of Piaget’s theory is the idea that children’s ways of thinking change over the course of childhood. Piaget provided evidence for these changes by comparing how children of different ages responded to questions and problems that he...
06:51
Assessing Dexterity with Reaching Tasks
0 Views •
2023
Reaching tasks are employed in behavioral neuroscience to investigate motor learning and forelimb dexterity. Much like human hands, rodents have dexterous forepaws, which are necessary for executing coordinated and precise motor movements. Experimenters may utilize food rewards to train rodents to reach and for testing their reaching abilities. These tasks help behavioral neuroscientist in understanding how CNS injuries, such as a stroke, may impair reaching ability and dexterity in humans.
09:13
Marginal Dishonesty: The Adding-to-10 Task
0 Views •
2023
Source: Julian Wills & Jay Van Bavel—New York University Classical economic theory asserts that people are rational and self-interested. In addition to seeking wealth and status, people are motivated by other goals. As a result, financial motives can sometimes be dwarfed by other internal needs, such as maintaining a positive self-concept or affiliating with other group members. Ethical dilemmas, such as the temptation to cheat on taxes, can result when these motives are in conflict. On...
08:22
Decision-making and the Iowa Gambling Task
0 Views •
2023
Source: Laboratories of Jonas T. Kaplan and Sarah I. Gimbel—University of Southern California Decision-making is an important component of human executive function, in which a choice about a course of action or cognition is made from many possibilities. Damage to the inferior parts of the frontal lobes can affect a person's ability to make good decisions. However, while decision-making deficits can have a large impact on one's life, these deficits can be difficult to quantify in the laboratory.
09:43
The 5-Choice Serial Reaction Time Task: A Task of Attention and Impulse Control for Rodents
0 Views •
Cited by 59 •
2014
This protocol describes the 5-choice serial reaction time task, which is an operant based task used to study attention and impulse control in rodents. Test day challenges, which are modifications of the standard task, increase flexibility of the task and can be combined with other manipulations to more fully characterize behavior.
FAQs
The task creates competition between a sudden peripheral stimulus and the instructed response. The stimulus automatically draws the eyes toward its location, while successful performance requires suppressing that tendency and selecting the opposite direction. This contrast allows researchers to examine inhibitory control as a coordinated process rather than measuring visual orienting alone.
Looking toward the mirror-image location requires participants to retain the stimulus position, transform that spatial information, and generate an intentional response. The task therefore engages working memory and attention in addition to inhibition. Errors can reflect difficulty maintaining the instruction, processing spatial relationships, or converting a visual cue into the appropriate voluntary movement.
Successful performance depends on coordinated activity across frontal eye fields, parietal regions, and oculomotor circuits. Frontal and parietal contributions support control of attention and the planned response, while oculomotor pathways execute the eye movement. Examining performance through this network provides a systems-level view of executive control rather than isolating a single brain area.
A reflexive saccade follows the sudden target, whereas an anti-saccade requires that response to be withheld and replaced with a purposeful movement in the opposite direction. The comparison highlights the additional control needed to override automatic behavior. This makes the task useful for studying how voluntary goals regulate rapid sensorimotor reactions.
Participants first maintain fixation, then view a peripheral stimulus that appears away from the fixation point. Instead of looking toward the stimulus, they must preserve the instructed rule and direct their gaze to its mirror-image location. Researchers record whether the response is correct and evaluate its timing and errors to characterize control of the eye movement.
Accuracy indicates how consistently participants select the instructed location, while error rates reveal failures to suppress the automatic response or apply the spatial rule. Response latency adds information about the timing of voluntary control. Considering these measures together helps distinguish successful inhibition, delayed responding, and inaccurate performance rather than relying on a single score.
Researchers use the task to investigate inhibitory control, working memory, attention, and executive function. Its performance measures also help identify impairments associated with neurological and psychiatric conditions. Because the task links observable eye movements with coordinated frontal, parietal, and oculomotor activity, it can connect behavioral differences with broader questions about brain function.