Tail Coiling Analysis
Tail Coiling Analysis - Related Videos
10:17
The Tail Suspension Test
0 Views •
Cited by 534 •
2012
The tail-suspension test is validated as an experimental procedure to assess antidepressant efficacy of drug treatments in mice. Mice are suspended by their tails for six minutes and escape-related behaviors are assessed. We describe procedures used in conducting the tail suspension test.
11:14
Combining Wet and Dry Lab Techniques to Guide the Crystallization of Large Coiled-coil Containing Proteins
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2017
We describe a framework incorporating straightforward biochemical and computational analysis to guide the characterization and crystallization of large coiled-coil domains. This framework can be adapted for globular proteins or extended to incorporate a variety of high-throughput techniques.
07:00
How to Use the H1 Deep Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Coil for Conditions Other than Depression
0 Views •
Cited by 13 •
2017
The H1 deep transcranial magnetic stimulation coil is FDA-cleared for the treatment of depression. We demonstrate how to utilize the H1 for other conditions, such as auditory hallucinations and PTSD, by moving the helmet to different locations over the subject's skull.
03:21
Murine Tail Lymphedema Model: An In Vivo Technique to Generate Sustained Lymphedema in Murine Tail
0 Views •
2025
This video describes an in vivo technique to generate murine tail lymphedema, an abnormal fluid accumulation in the interstitial tissue space leading to swelling in the tail. The model is applied to study mechanisms and therapy for lymphedema.
07:26
Isolation of Genomic DNA from Mouse Tails
0 Views •
Cited by 23 •
2007
FAQs
Spontaneous coiling reflects ongoing motor activity without an introduced trigger, whereas stimulus-evoked coiling measures the response to a defined stimulation. Comparing the two conditions can separate baseline motor output from responsiveness of the underlying neuromuscular circuitry. This distinction helps reveal whether a developmental, genetic, or chemical perturbation alters general activity, stimulus responsiveness, or both.
Frequency, duration, amplitude, and direction provide complementary views of motor performance. Frequency indicates how often movements occur, while duration and amplitude describe their temporal and physical extent. Direction can reveal changes in movement orientation or patterning. Examining these measures together is more informative than relying on a single count, because different neural or neuromuscular effects may produce distinct behavioral signatures.
Tail movements depend on coordinated activity within developing neuromuscular circuits, making their timing and pattern useful behavioral indicators of spinal motor network function. During vertebrate development, changes in coiling features can therefore reflect altered circuit maturation or activity. In neuroscience studies, these readouts connect observable behavior with the development of neural systems that later support locomotion.
A broad motor impairment may appear as reduced movement frequency, shorter duration, or lower amplitude, whereas altered patterning may be more evident through changes in direction or the relationship among movement features. The assay does not rely on one outcome measure, so researchers can compare multiple parameters to determine whether a perturbation primarily suppresses activity or changes how movements are organized.
The workflow begins by recording spontaneous or stimulus-evoked tail movements in developing vertebrate models, such as zebrafish embryos. Video observations are then used to quantify frequency, duration, amplitude, and direction. Automated video tracking can streamline this measurement process, allowing rapid and consistent analysis across samples while preserving a noninvasive behavioral readout.
Researchers can apply the assay to characterize motor development, examine the effects of genetic or chemical perturbations, and evaluate neurotoxicity. Its rapid and noninvasive format supports comparisons across experimental conditions, while automated tracking makes larger behavioral datasets practical. The resulting movement profiles can indicate changes in neuromuscular circuit activity without requiring invasive measurement of the developing model.