Fundoplication Wrap
Fundoplication Wrap - Related Videos
08:21
Utilizing a 3D Printed Laparoscopic Nissen Fundoplication Model to Shorten a Resident's Learning Curve
0 Views •
2025
This study describes how 3D printed models effectively accelerate the rate at which advanced laparoscopic surgery skills used in Nissen Fundoplication are mastered by surgical residents during residency training, thereby enhancing future preparedness.
11:19
Robotic Myotomy and Partial Fundoplication for Achalasia
0 Views •
2023
Surgical myotomy with a partial fundoplication may be used in selected patients as a definitive treatment for achalasia. This article provides a step-by-step description of a robotic myotomy and partial fundoplication in a 32-year-old patient with megaesophagus.
09:16
An Alternative to the Traditional Cold Pressor Test: The Cold Pressor Arm Wrap
0 Views •
Cited by 21 •
2014
The cold pressor test is a classic stress induction task used in a wide range of research examining the relationship between stress and cognition, emotion, and behavior. In this article, a practical and versatile alternative to the traditional cold pressor test is presented: the cold pressor arm wrap.
07:54
Design, Fabrication, and Administration of the Hand Active Sensation Test (HASTe)
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2015
The Hand Active Sensation Test (HASTe) is a valid and reliable measure of haptic performance, which has been used successfully to identify impaired haptic touch in individuals with stroke. The purpose of this paper is to describe the design, fabrication and administration of the HASTe.
16:05
Large-Scale Screens of Metagenomic Libraries
0 Views •
Cited by 9 •
2007
Metagenomic libraries archive large fragments of contiguous genomic sequences from microorganisms without requiring prior cultivation. Generating a ...
FAQs
The choice depends on the need to balance reflux control with postoperative tolerability. A complete wrap places the fundus around the lower esophagus more extensively, whereas a partial wrap provides a different degree of reinforcement. The supplied context does not identify one as universally preferable, so planning must account for swallowing and gas-related symptoms.
Resistance to backward movement of stomach contents is useful only if forward passage remains possible. During swallowing, the reinforced lower esophageal region must still permit food to enter the stomach. This functional balance explains why surgical planning considers both reflux reduction and possible swallowing symptoms rather than treating increased closure as the only goal.
By reducing the upward movement of stomach contents, the wrap limits the esophagus’s exposure to acidic material. That reduction connects the mechanical effect of reinforcement with clinical benefits such as less heartburn and regurgitation. The outcome is therefore not simply a stronger barrier; it is decreased acid contact with the esophagus.
Planning includes deciding whether to create a complete or partial wrap and positioning the fundus around the lower esophagus. Surgeons may perform the technique during minimally invasive repair of gastroesophageal reflux disease or an associated hiatal hernia. These choices are intended to improve reflux control while limiting swallowing or gas-related symptoms.
It may be incorporated into minimally invasive surgery when gastroesophageal reflux disease occurs with an associated hiatal hernia. In that setting, the wrap is part of a broader repair rather than an isolated discussion of reflux symptoms. The source specifically links this combined surgical context with efforts to reinforce the lower esophageal barrier.
Expected benefits include relief of heartburn and regurgitation through reduced acid exposure. At the same time, the procedure can be associated with swallowing or gas-related symptoms, which makes outcome assessment broader than reflux control alone. In medicine, these competing outcomes help explain why the extent of the wrap requires careful surgical planning.