7.21
Elegir entre proyectos: recursos limitados
En la presupuestación de capital, la selección de proyectos positivos de VAN agrega valor a una empresa. Aunque lo ideal es que las empresas persigan…
En la presupuestación de capital, se pueden emplear varios métodos a la hora de elegir entre proyectos con recursos limitados, siendo el valor presente neto o VAN uno de los más comunes.
El VAN ayuda a evaluar el valor total que cada proyecto agregará a la empresa, medido en términos de su valor presente.
Por ejemplo, considere una empresa de fabricación de chocolate con un presupuesto de cien mil dólares para inversión y dos proyectos en consideración.
El Proyecto A requiere una inversión inicial de ochenta mil dólares y espera entradas de efectivo de ciento treinta mil dólares en cinco años.
El Proyecto B requiere una inversión inicial de cincuenta mil dólares, con entradas de efectivo esperadas de ciento veinte mil dólares durante cinco años.
El VAN se calcula considerando una tasa de descuento del diez por ciento.
El VAN para el Proyecto A es de diecinueve mil dólares, y el VAN para el Proyecto B es de aproximadamente cuarenta y un mil dólares.
A pesar del mayor costo inicial y las entradas totales del Proyecto A, el Proyecto B es más beneficioso con un VAN más alto.
Por lo tanto, bajo capital limitado, se elegiría el Proyecto B ya que ofrece un mayor retorno de la inversión después de considerar el valor temporal del dinero.
Este método garantiza el mejor uso de los recursos escasos maximizando el valor económico.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Business videos
Q1: Why is NPV the best method for choosing between projects with limited resources?
NPV evaluates the total value each project adds to the company in present value terms, accounting for the time value of money. When capital is constrained, NPV helps maximize economic value by comparing projects on a standardized basis. Unlike methods that ignore timing, NPV ensures scarce resources are allocated to projects delivering the highest return, making it ideal for capital-constrained decisions.
Q2: How does the discount rate affect NPV calculations when comparing projects?
The discount rate reflects the time value of money, converting future cash inflows into present value. A higher discount rate reduces the present value of future cash flows, making projects with later inflows less attractive. In the chocolate company example, using a 10% discount rate, Project B's NPV of approximately $41,000 exceeds Project A's $19,000, demonstrating how the discount rate influences project ranking and selection decisions.
Q3: Can a company with limited capital pursue all positive NPV projects?
No. Although selecting positive NPV projects adds value to a company, budget constraints often limit the capital available for investment within a given period. When facing limited resources, managers must prioritize projects to maximize total NPV while staying within budget limits. This requires careful evaluation and ranking of available projects to achieve the greatest economic value from constrained capital.
Q4: Why was Project B chosen over Project A despite having lower total cash inflows?
Project B was chosen because it offers a higher NPV of approximately $41,000 compared to Project A's $19,000, despite lower total inflows. NPV accounts for both the timing and magnitude of cash flows through discounting. Project B requires less initial capital ($50,000 versus $80,000), providing better return on investment after considering the time value of money, making it the superior choice under budget constraints.
Q5: What role does initial investment amount play in project selection under capital constraints?
Initial investment directly impacts project feasibility under budget constraints. Project A required $80,000, leaving only $20,000 for other investments from the $100,000 budget. Project B required only $50,000, allowing flexibility for additional investments. When capital is limited, lower initial costs can be advantageous, especially when combined with strong NPV performance, enabling better resource allocation and potentially funding multiple projects.
Q6: How does capital budgeting help companies optimize resource allocation?
Capital budgeting systematically evaluates projects using methods like NPV to ensure scarce resources generate maximum economic value. By comparing projects on standardized financial metrics, companies can rank investments and select those delivering the highest returns relative to their cost and risk. This disciplined approach prevents wasteful spending and ensures limited capital is deployed to opportunities that best serve shareholder interests and company growth.
Q7: What is the relationship between cash flow timing and NPV in project comparison?
NPV explicitly incorporates cash flow timing through discounting, recognizing that money received sooner is worth more than money received later. Projects generating cash inflows earlier have higher NPVs than those with delayed returns, all else equal. This time-value adjustment ensures that when comparing projects with limited capital, companies select investments that deliver value most efficiently, maximizing the present worth of their constrained investment portfolio.