This study describes a mouse model to study the synergistic effect of nicotine on the progression of pulmonary fibrosis in experimental silicosis mice. The dual-exposure mouse model simulates the pathological progression in the lung after simultaneous exposure to nicotine and silica. The methods described are simple and highly reproducible.
Smoking and exposure to silica are common among occupational workers, and silica is more likely to injure the lungs of smokers than non-smokers. The role of nicotine, the primary addictive ingredient in cigarettes, in silicosis development is unclear. The mouse model employed in this study was simple and easily controlled, and it effectively simulated the effects of chronic nicotine ingestion and repeated exposure to silica on lung fibrosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transition in human beings. In addition, this model can help in the direct study of the effects of nicotine on silicosis while avoiding the effects of other components in cigarette smoke.
After environmental adaptation, mice were injected subcutaneously with 0.25 mg/kg nicotine solution into the loose skin over the neck every morning and evening at 12 h intervals over 40 days. Additionally, crystalline silica powder (1-5 µm) was suspended in normal saline, diluted to a suspension of 20 mg/mL, and dispersed evenly using an ultrasonic water bath. The isoflurane-anesthetized mice inhaled 50 µL of this silica dust suspension through the nose and were awoken via chest massage. Silica exposure was administrated daily on days 5-19.
The double-exposed mouse model was exposed to nicotine and then silica, which matches the exposure history of workers who are exposed to both harmful factors. In addition, nicotine promoted pulmonary fibrosis through epithelial-mesenchymal transformation (EMT) in mice. This animal model can be used to study the effects of multiple factors on the development of silicosis.
Silica exposure in workers is inevitable in some occupational settings, and once exposed to silica, the deterioration progresses even after removal from the environment. In addition, most of these workers smoke, and traditional cigarettes contain thousands of chemicals, with the key addictive component being nicotine1. E-cigarettes are becoming increasingly popular in younger age groups2; these e-cigarettes act as a nicotine delivery system and increase nicotine access, thus increasing lung susceptibility and pneumonia3. Cigarette smoke also accelerates pulmonary fibrosis in bleomycin-exposed mice4 and increases pulmonary toxicity and fibrosis in silica-exposed mice5,6. However, whether nicotine can affect the inflammatory and pulmonary fibrosis process caused by silica remains to be investigated.
The silicosis mouse model established by the one-time inhalation of a high dose of silica into the trachea is traumatic to mice. Although this method quickly provides a silicosis model, it does not match the reality of an environment where workers are repeatedly exposed to silica. Therefore, we established a silica-exposed mouse model by repeatedly giving a low dose of silica suspensions via a nasal drip; this dose can cause inflammation and fibrosis in mice.
To circumvent the effects of other cigarette components, this mouse model was subcutaneously injected with nicotine into the loose skin of the neck for determining the effect of the addictive component, nicotine, on silicosis. By administering subcutaneous injections, accurate dosing can be achieved, thus making it possible to create nicotine exposure models and observe dose-toxicity responses, as well as addiction. A nicotine addiction model has been developed in male mice, with a nicotine injection dose of 0.2-0.4 mg/kg7,8. In that model, to meet the drug-seeking needs of the addicted mice, two subcutaneous injections were administered at intervals of 12 h. This mouse nicotine addiction model is useful for simulating human smoking habits and exposure to silica.
Single-factor animal models have limitations in disease studies, whereas the method described here involves a two-factor mouse model of nicotine and silica co-exposure. Prior to the silica exposure, the mice were pre-exposed to nicotine to replicate nicotine exposure in people who smoke. Subsequently, silica exposure took place from day 5 to day 19 to imitate silica exposure in a working environment for individuals with a history of smoking.
Alveolar macrophages are known to play a significant role in the regulation of lung inflammation and fibrosis. Macrophages cannot break silica down upon its inhalation of silica, leading to macrophage polarization or apoptosis9 and the release of cytokines such as tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β). M1 macrophages, which are identified by the presence of the surface marker CD86, are the primary instigators of the inflammatory response in silicosis, while M2 macrophages, which are marked by CD206, are responsible for the fibrotic phase of the condition10. In dual-exposed mice, nicotine induced the polarization of macrophages toward the M2 phenotype in silica-injured lungs, thus promoting pulmonary fibrosis. Furthermore, TGF-β1 is key to the induction of fibrosis and EMT11; the increased expression of TGF-β1 accelerated the progression of lung fibrosis through EMT. This model successfully analyzed the effects of nicotine on silicosis and further highlighted the importance of nicotine cessation.
All procedures were conducted according to the guidelines issued by the National Institutes of Health's Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (the 8th edition of the NRC) and were approved by Anhui University of Science and Technology Animal Ethics Committee.
1. Animal preparation
2. Nicotine preparation
NOTE: The nicotine density is 1.01 g/mL.
3. Silica preparation
4. Mouse capture and nicotine exposure
5. Silica exposure in vivo
6. Acquisition of fresh and fixed lung tissues
7. Hematoxylin and eosin (HE) staining
8. Masson staining
9. Immunohistochemistry
10. Western blot analysis
A mouse model to study nicotine combined with silica exposure was established to investigate the potential role of nicotine in the progression of silicosis in mice. Figure 1 depicts the experimental procedure for using a dual-exposure mouse model, which paired a nicotine injection with the nasal instillation of a silica suspension. The pathological changes of the mice in each group were observed using HE staining. The mice exposed to nicotine combined with silica had significantly more severe lung damage than those exposed to nicotine or silica alone. Lymphocytes increased near the lymphatic vessels in the lungs of the nicotine-exposed mice, forming inflammatory cell clusters. Masson staining revealed a significant increase in collagen fiber deposition in the lungs exposed to nicotine combined with silica compared to the lungs in the other groups, and this was supported by the Masson staining quantification (Figure 2). The alveolar structure was destroyed in the silica-exposed mice, and the number of macrophages increased. However, after exposure to nicotine combined with silica, there was significant inflammatory cell infiltration, and fibroblast nodules appeared. In addition, accumulated macrophages, especially M2 macrophages, present in the double-exposed group. M2 macrophages are essential for the advanced fibrotic stage of silicosis.
Additionally, a significant increase in the pro-fibrotic factor TGF-β1 was observed by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in the lungs of dual-exposed mice, especially in inflammatory cells near lymphatic vessels (Figure 3). TGF-β1 secreted by macrophages promotes the EMT of epithelial cells and pulmonary fibrosis12. Compared with mice exposed to silica alone, vimentin levels were significantly elevated in the lungs of dual-exposure mice. Both IHC staining and protein quantification indicated severe EMT in dual-exposed mice (Figure 4). The combined evidence suggests that chronic silica exposure promotes EMT after the upregulation of TGF-β1, leading to an increase in fibroblasts and progressive fibrosis. At the same time, the addition of nicotine accelerates the process of pulmonary fibrosis by aggravating EMT, allowing lung fibrosis to appear earlier. This model is designed to explore the impact of nicotine on pulmonary fibrosis, which is a consequence of chronic silica exposure in humans.
Figure 1: Design of an experimental model of combined exposure to nicotine and silica in mice. Continuous injection of nicotine for 1-40 days and continuous nasal instillation of silica for 5-19 days. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: Nicotine promotes the formation of fibroblastic masses in the lungs of silica-exposed mice. (A) HE staining was used to visualize pathological changes in the lungs. The dual-exposed mice had severe inflammatory cell infiltration and fibrosis. The green arrows indicate inflammatory cell masses. Scale bar = 50 µm. (B) Masson staining was used to show collagen fibers in the lungs. Scale bar = 50 µm. (C) Quantification of collagen fibers in the lungs. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: Increased CD206-positive cells and TGF-β1 in the lungs of nicotine and silica dual-exposed mice. (A) IHC staining of CD206 was used to observe the distribution and expression of macrophages in the dual-exposed mice. CD206-positive macrophages increased in the lungs of mice after combined nicotine and silica exposure. The short arrows represent CD206-positive cells. Scale bar = 50 µm. (B) TGF-β1, a promoter of fibrosis, was elevated in dual-exposed mice. The long arrows represent TGF-β1-positive cells. Scale bar = 50 µm. (C,D) AOD of CD206 and TGF-β1. AOD = IOD (integrated optical density)/area. The AOD reflects the concentration of CD206 and TGF-β1 per unit area. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Abbreviations: TGF-β1 = transforming growth factor-beta; IHC = immunohistochemistry; AOD = average optical density. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Promotion of lung fibrosis by nicotine in silica-exposed mice through the aggravation of EMT. (A) The expression of vimentin in each group was observed by IHC staining. Vimentin was strongly expressed in the lungs of the mice exposed to nicotine and silica. Scale bar = 50 µm.(B) Western blot of vimentin expression in each exposure group, with an increase in vimentin in the lung tissues of double-exposed mice. (C) The AOD value of vimentin was significantly more elevated in the double-exposed group compared to the other groups. (D) The relative protein expression level of vimentin compared to GAPDH. The vimentin expression in the double-exposure group was significantly higher than in the nicotine- or silica-exposure groups. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001, ****p < 0.0001. Abbreviations: EMT = epithelial-mesenchymal transition; AOD = average optical density. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
A dual-exposure animal model is necessary to investigate the role and the potential mechanisms of concurrent exposure to nicotine and crystalline silicon dioxide. This model was achieved in this work through the subcutaneous injection of nicotine and the nasal drip of silica. To ensure a successful nicotine injection, the operator has to become familiar with grasping the mice, as grasping the skin at the back of the neck could be painful for them. Therefore, allowing the mice to adapt gradually to the grasping is important. In addition, a critical step in silica exposure in mice is the nasal drip. To increase the success of the procedure and the survival rate of the mice, it is essential to practice the nasal drip beforehand.
When performing the injection, the syringe should be skimmed over the mouse’s head to avoid a strong struggle when the mouse sees the syringe. The mouse’s tail should be firmly grasped with the right hand, while the left hand should be used to push the skin up to the ear margin at the back of the neck carefully and gently and to pinch the skin there. After releasing the mouse’s tail with the right hand, the tail and hind limbs should be stabilized using the left thumb and ring finger to prevent biting. Using a 1 mL syringe in the right hand, the needle should be inserted into the loose skin above the neck at a 30° angle in a head-to-tail direction. The needle should be withdrawn slightly after the resistance is lost, and the injection should be administered slowly and evenly. On days 5-19, mice in the dual-exposed group were exposed to nicotine and silica. It is recommended that the nicotine be injected at 08:00 a.m., followed by the nasal drip of silicon dioxide at 14:00 p.m., and another injection of nicotine at 20:00 p.m. The two nicotine injections must be given 12 h apart to avoid the effects of repeated grasping on the mice.
Performing subcutaneous injections and nasal drip presents several technical challenges. For subcutaneous injections, the mice should be grasped with appropriate force. If the skin at the back of the neck is pinched too tightly, the mouse’s airway will be blocked, quickly leading to suffocation. For optimal strength, the skin at the back of the neck should be pinched until the eyeballs protrude slightly. At this time, the mouse feels the lowest pain and breathes smoothly. In addition, a 1 mL syringe that is emptied of air should be used to draw the nicotine injection from the tube, followed by a further 0.1-0.2 mL of air. Before injecting, the bubbles should be gently flicked out. Due to the small volume of the injection, the nicotine left at the tip of the needle end may lead to an insufficient dose. The key parts of the injection are inserting the needle quickly, injecting the nicotine slowly, and removing the needle gently. For nasal drip, in this study, the nasal cavity of the mice was fully exposed under deep anesthesia, followed by the slow and uniform instillation of a silicon dioxide suspension. It is also important to gently press the thoracic cavity after silica exposure to avoid coughing or suffocation.
This model has certain limitations. The 1-5 µm silica particles used in the experiments were not collected from the environment and were pure silica particles. In contrast, in actual occupational settings, workers may be exposed to a variety of hazardous materials, not just silica particles, such as a mixture of coal and silica dust in a ceramic factory or a coal mine. We used nasal instillation silica to achieve low doses and repeated multiple exposures to simulate the chronic exposure of workers. In the dual-exposure mouse model, although the nicotine does not come from cigarette smoke exposure, the injected nicotine directly enters the bloodstream, allowing for a more focused exploration of the role of nicotine in the silicosis process and the avoidance of the effects of other components of cigarette smoke.
Scientific research on silicosis has typically utilized single-factor mouse models, either through the inhalation or bronchial perfusion of silica, to assess the role of silica in the development of disease. An alternative approach is the nasal instillation of silicon dioxide, which is simple and easy and allows for the establishment of repeated and chronic silica exposure models13. The well-established silicon dioxide nasal drip model causes minimal damage to the mice and could be combined with other factors to create a multi-factorial-exposed animal model. Additionally, the main methods of nicotine exposure in mice include nicotine in drinking water, subcutaneous injection of nicotine, nicotine infusion via osmotic minipumps, and tobacco smoke exposure14. The subcutaneous injection used in the dual-exposure model allows the dosage and timing of nicotine to be precisely set, ensuring that each mouse is administered the same dose.
In short, the animal model of nicotine in combination with silica exposure replicates a realistic chronic exposure pattern, and this model can be utilized for further investigations on the impacts of nicotine on inflammation and fibrosis in the development of silicosis. Additionally, this model serves as a foundation for forming a dual-exposure animal model with multiple doses and time frames.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
This study was supported by the University Synergy Innovation Program of Anhui Province (GXXT-2021-077) and the Anhui University of Science and Technology Graduate Innovation Fund (2021CX2120).
10% formalin neutral fixative | Nanchang Yulu Experimental Equipment Co. | ||
alcohol disinfectant | Xintai Kanyuan Disinfection Products Co. | ||
BSA, Fraction V | Beyotime Biotechnology | ST023-200g | |
CD206 Monoclonal antibody | Proteintech | 60143-1-IG | |
Citrate Antigen Retrieval Solution | biosharp life science | BL619A | |
dimethyl benzene | West Asia Chemical Technology (Shandong) Co | ||
Enhanced BCA Protein Assay Kit | Beyotime Biotechnology | P0009 | |
GAPDH Polyclonal antibody | Proteintech | 10494-1-AP | |
Hematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) | Beyotime Biotechnology | C0105S | |
HRP substrate | Millipore Corporation | P90720 | |
HRP-conjugated Affinipure Goat Anti-Mouse IgG(H+L) | Proteintech | SA00001-1 | |
HRP-conjugated Affinipure Goat Anti-Rabbit IgG(H+L) | Proteintech | SA00001-2 | |
ImmPACT[R] DAB EqV Peroxidase (HRP) Substrate | Vector Laboratories | SK-4103-100 | |
Masson's Trichrome Stain Kit | Solarbio | G1340 | |
Methanol | Macklin | ||
Nicotine | Sigma | N-3876 | |
phosphate buffered saline (PBS) | Biosharp | BL601A | |
Physiological saline | The First People's Hospital of Huainan City | ||
PMSF | Beyotime Biotechnological | ST505 | |
Positive fluorescence microscope | OlympusCorporation | BX53+DP74 | |
Prestained Color Protein Molecular Weight Marker, or Prestained Color Protein Ladder | Beyotime Biotechnology | P0071 | |
PVDF membranes | Millipore | 3010040001 | |
RIPA Lysis Buffer | Beyotime Biotechnology | P0013B | |
SDS-PAGE gel preparation kit | Beyotime Biotechnology | P0012A | |
Silicon dioxide | Sigma | #BCBV6865 | |
TGF-β | Bioss | bs-0086R | |
Vimentin Polyclonal antibody | Proteintech | 10366-1-AP | |
Name of Material/ Equipment | Company | Catalog Number | |
0.5 mL Tube | Biosharp | BS-05-M | |
Oscillatory thermostatic metal bath | Abson | ||
Paraffin Embedding Machine | Precision (Changzhou) Medical Equipment Co. | PBM-A | |
Paraffin Slicer | Jinhua Kratai Instruments Co. | ||
Pipettes | Eppendorf | ||
Polarized light microscope | Olympus | BX51 | |
Precision Balance | Acculab | ALC-110.4 | |
RODI IOT intelligent multifunctional water purification system | RSJ | RODI-220BN | |
Scilogex SK-D1807-E 3D Shaker | Scilogex | ||
Small animal anesthesia machine | Anhui Yaokun Biotech Co., Ltd. | ZL-04A | |
Universal Pipette Tips | KIRGEN | KG1011 | |
Universal Pipette Tips | KIRGEN | KG1212 | |
Universal Pipette Tips | KIRGEN | KG1313 | |
Vortex Mixers | VWR | ||
Name of Material/ Equipment | |||
Adobe Illustrator | |||
ImageJ | |||
Photoshop | |||
Prism7.0 |