18.4
Représentations des Jeux
Dans la théorie des jeux, les jeux peuvent être classés en jeux à somme nulle ou non nulle, en fonction de la répartition des gains et des pertes entr…
Les jeux peuvent être classés en jeux à somme nulle et en jeux à somme non nulle.
Un jeu à somme nulle est un jeu où le gain d’un joueur est exactement égal à la perte d’un autre. Par exemple, dans une partie de poker privée, le montant total gagné par certains joueurs est exactement le montant perdu par d’autres.
D'autre part, les jeux à somme non nulle sont des scénarios où le résultat n'aboutit pas à un échange égal de gains et de pertes. Dans ces jeux, il est possible pour tous les participants de bénéficier ou de perdre ensemble.
Les jeux à somme non nulle peuvent être divisés en jeux à somme positive et en jeux à somme négative.
Les jeux à somme positive sont des scénarios où tous les participants peuvent gagner, et la somme de leurs gains est supérieure à celle des pertes. Par exemple, dans le cadre d’un accord commercial entre deux pays, les deux pays peuvent bénéficier de meilleures conditions commerciales, ce qui conduit à une situation où les deux pays sont mieux lotis qu’auparavant.
Les jeux à somme négative sont l’opposé, où les pertes totales dépassent les gains.
Un exemple est un procès coûteux entre deux entreprises. Dans de tels scénarios, les dépenses combinées des frais juridiques et des dommages-intérêts payés dépassent souvent les avantages que le gagnant pourrait obtenir.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Business videos
Q1: What is the main difference between zero-sum and non-zero-sum games?
In a zero-sum game, one player's gain exactly equals another player's loss, keeping total resources constant. Non-zero-sum games differ because gains and losses are not perfectly balanced, allowing all players to benefit or lose together. Understanding cooperative vs non cooperative games helps clarify how different game structures enable different strategic outcomes.
Q2: Can you give an example of a zero-sum game in business?
A bidding war for a contract is a classic zero-sum game example. When one company wins the contract, the other loses out entirely, reflecting the fixed outcome where the winner's gain directly equals the loser's loss. The total value remains constant regardless of which company secures the bid.
Q3: What are positive-sum games and how do they differ from negative-sum games?
Positive-sum games occur when all participants can receive gains, with the total outcome larger than any losses. For example, two firms collaborating on new technology both increase market shares and profit. Negative-sum games are opposite: total losses exceed individual gains, such as price wars where reduced margins hurt all competitors despite one capturing more market share.
Q4: How does understanding game classification help players develop better strategies?
By identifying whether a game is zero-sum or non-zero-sum, players can better predict potential benefits or losses and adjust their approach accordingly. In zero-sum games, competitive strategies dominate. In positive-sum games, cooperative approaches may yield mutual gains. This classification enables players to align their tactics with the actual payoff structure and available opportunities.
Q5: What happens in a negative-sum game like a costly lawsuit?
In a costly lawsuit between two companies, combined legal expenses and damages often exceed any benefits the winner receives. Both parties lose overall due to high transaction costs, making the total outcome negative. Even the victorious company may end up worse off financially than if the dispute had been resolved through negotiation or settlement.
Q6: Why is a trade agreement between two countries considered a positive-sum game?
A trade agreement is a positive-sum game because both countries can benefit from improved trade terms simultaneously. Each nation gains access to better goods, services, or markets, creating mutual advantage. The combined gains exceed any losses, leaving both countries better off than before the agreement, demonstrating how cooperation can expand total value.
Q7: How does a private poker game exemplify a zero-sum game?
In a private poker game, the total amount won by some players exactly equals the amount lost by others. No new value is created; money simply transfers between participants. The fixed pool of chips or money ensures that every winner's gain corresponds precisely to losers' losses, making it a perfect zero-sum scenario.