30.17
Campi elettromagnetici
I campi elettrici generati da cariche statiche, spesso indicati come campi elettrostatici, sono caratteristicamente diversi dai campi elettrici creati…
Recall Gauss's law for electric fields produced by charges and Faraday's law for electric fields created by the time-varying magnetic flux.
Since the former follows Gauss's law, its integral over a closed loop is zero; it is a conservative field. However, using Faraday's law, the latter is a non-conservative field.
Moreover, since it always forms a closed loop, its flux through any closed surface is zero. Thus, it disobeys Gauss's law.
Moving charges or steady currents produce magnetic fields which obey Ampère's law. However, time-varying electric flux gives rise to magnetic fields that do not obey Ampère's law.
Recall the aim of studying electromagnetism: calculate the force on a test charge so that, via Newton's second law of motion, its trajectory can be determined.
Experiments reveal that the conservative and non-conservative electric fields, and the Ampère's law obeying and disobeying magnetic fields, give rise to the same kind of Lorentz force on a test charge. Moreover, they are found to add vectorially.
Hence, they are added together and simply called electric and magnetic fields.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Core videos
Q1: What is the difference between electrostatic fields and induced electric fields?
Electrostatic fields, produced by static charges, are conservative fields where no net work is done on a test charge completing a closed loop. Induced electric fields, created by time-varying magnetic flux, are non-conservative fields where net work is done proportional to the rate of magnetic flux change. Despite these differences, both exert the same Lorentz force on test charges.
Q2: Why do induced electric fields disobey Gauss's law?
Induced electric fields always form closed loops, so their flux through any closed surface is zero. Since the number of field lines entering and leaving a closed surface is equal, there is no net flux. This violates Gauss's law, which applies only to electrostatic fields produced by charges, not to fields generated by changing magnetic fields.
Q3: How do magnetic fields produced by steady currents differ from those created by changing electric fields?
Steady currents produce magnetic fields that obey Ampère's law. Changing electric fields also produce magnetic fields that do not obey Ampère's law. However, both types exert the same Lorentz force on moving test charges and add vectorially through superposition, justifying their unified classification as magnetic fields.
Q4: What is the principle of superposition in electromagnetic fields?
The principle of superposition states that electric and magnetic forces from different sources add vectorially. Experiments show that conservative and non-conservative electric fields, and magnetic fields from different mechanisms, all produce the same Lorentz force on test charges. These forces combine additively, allowing fields to be simply added together regardless of their origin.
Q5: Why are different types of electric and magnetic fields unified under single field concepts?
Despite originating from different mechanisms, all electric fields exert the same Lorentz force on test charges and follow superposition. Similarly, magnetic fields from steady currents and changing electric fields produce identical forces and add vectorially. This remarkable simplicity in nature justifies calling them all electric and magnetic fields without distinguishing their origins.
Q6: When is the distinction between conservative and non-conservative electric fields important?
The distinction between conservative electrostatic fields and non-conservative induced electric fields matters in specific applications, such as inside an ideal inductor. In most practical scenarios, both field types are treated together as electric fields because they produce identical Lorentz forces and follow superposition, simplifying electromagnetic analysis.
Q7: How does Faraday's law relate to the properties of induced electric fields?
Faraday's law describes electric fields created by time-varying magnetic flux. These induced electric fields are non-conservative, meaning net work is done on a test charge moving through a closed loop, proportional to the rate of magnetic flux change. This contrasts with Gauss's law for electrostatic fields, which are conservative and produce zero net work around closed loops.