This protocol presents a standardized suture expansion mouse model and a 3-D visualization method to study the mechanobiological changes of the suture and bone remodeling under tensile force loading.
Craniofacial sutures play a crucial role beyond being fibrous joints connecting craniofacial bones; they also serve as the primary niche for calvarial and facial bone growth, housing mesenchymal stem cells and osteoprogenitors. As most craniofacial bones develop through intramembranous ossification, the sutures’ marginal regions act as initiation points. Due to this significance, these sutures have become intriguing targets in orthopedic therapies like spring-assisted cranial vault expansion, rapid maxillary expansion, and maxillary protraction. Under orthopedic tracing force, suture stem cells are rapidly activated, becoming a dynamic source for bone remodeling during expansion. Despite their importance, the physiological changes during bone remodeling periods remain poorly understood. Traditional sectioning methods, primarily in the sagittal direction, do not capture the comprehensive changes occurring throughout the entire suture. This study established a standard mouse model for sagittal suture expansion. To fully visualize bone remodeling changes post-suture expansion, the PEGASOS tissue clearing method was combined with whole-mount EdU staining and calcium chelating double labeling. This allowed the visualization of highly proliferating cells and new bone formation across the entire calvarial bones following expansion. This protocol offers a standardized suture expansion mouse model and a 3-D visualization method, shedding light on the mechanobiological changes in sutures and bone remodeling under tensile force loading.
Craniofacial sutures are fibrous tissues that connect craniofacial bones and play essential roles in the growth and remodeling of craniofacial bones. The structure of the suture resembles a river, providing a flow of cell resources to nourish and build the "river bank", known as the osteogenic fronts, which contribute to the formation of craniofacial bones via intramembranous osteogenesis1.
Interest in craniofacial sutures has been driven by clinical needs to understand premature closure of cranial sutures and facial suture dysfunction, which may lead to craniofacial deformities and even life-threatening conditions in children. Open suturectomy is routinely used in clinical treatment, but long-term follow-up has shown incomplete re-ossification recurrence in some patients2. Minimally invasive craniotomy assisted by expansion springs or endoscopic stripe craniectomy may provide a safer approach to preserving the potential suture rather than discarding the tissues3. Similarly, orthopedic therapies such as facemasks and expansion appliances have been widely used to treat sagittal or horizontal maxillary hypoplasia, with some studies extending the age limitation to treat adult patients via miniscrew-assisted palatal expanders4,5,6. Additionally, cranial suture regeneration with mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) combined with biodegradable materials is a potential therapy in the future, offering a novel direction for the treatment of related diseases7. However, the function process or regulatory mechanism of sutures remains elusive.
Bone remodeling mainly consists of a balance between bone formation conducted by osteoblasts and bone resorption conducted by osteoclasts, where osteogenic differentiation of stem cells stimulated by mechanical signals plays an important role. After decades of research, it has been found that craniofacial sutures are highly plastic mesenchymal stem cell niches8. Suture stem cells (SuSCs) are a heterogeneous group of stem cells, belonging to mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) or bone stem cells (SSCs). SuSCs are labeled in vivo by four markers, including Gli1, Axin2, Prrx1, and Ctsk. Gli1+ SuSCs, in particular, have strictly verified the biological characteristics of stem cells, not only exhibiting high expression of typical MSC markers but also demonstrating excellent osteogenic and chondrogenic potential9. Previous research has shown that Gli1+ SuSCs actively contribute to new bone formation under tensile force, identifying them as the suture stem cell source supporting distraction osteogenesis10.
In the past, extensive mechanical characteristics of stem cells were studied in vitro via Flexcell, four-point bending, micro-magnet loading system, and others. Although mouse cranial suture-derived mesenchymal cells have been identified in vitro11, and human suture mesenchymal stem cells have also been isolated recently12, the biomechanical response of suture cells remains unclear in the in vitro system. To further investigate the bone remodeling process, a suture expansion model based on isolated calvaria organ culture has been established, paving the way for establishing a useful in vivo suture expansion model1,13. Rabbits14 and rats15 have been the most widely used animals in basic research for suture expansion. However, mice are preferred animal models for exploring human disease due to their highly homologous genome with humans, numerous gene modification lines, and strong reproductive hybridization ability. Existing mouse models of cranial suture expansion typically rely on stainless steel orthodontic spring wires to apply tensile force to the sagittal suture16,17. In these models, two holes are made in each side of the parietal bones to fix the expansion device, and the wires are embedded under the skin, which may affect the cell activation mode.
Regarding the visualization method, the two-dimensional observation of slices in the sagittal direction has been generally adopted for decades. However, considering that bone remodeling is a complex three-dimensional dynamic process, obtaining complete three-dimensional information has become an urgent need. The PEGASOS tissue transparency technique emerged to meet this requirement18,19. It offers unique advantages for the transparency of hard and soft tissues, enabling the complete bone remodeling process to be reproduced in three-dimensional space.
To gain a deeper and more comprehensive understanding of the physiological changes in the bone remodeling periods, a standard sagittal suture expansion mouse model with a spring setting between the handmade holders was established10. With a standardized acid etching and bonding procedure, the expansion device could be firmly bonded to the cranial bone, generating a tensile force perpendicular to the sagittal suture. Furthermore, the PEGASOS tissue clearing method was applied after double labeling of the mineralized bone post-expansion to fully visualize the bone modeling changes after suture expansion.
All experimental procedures described here were approved by the Animal Care Committee of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (SH9H-2023-A616-SB). 4-week-old C57BL/6 male mice were used in this study. All the instruments used were sterilized prior to the procedure.
1. Preparation of the suture expansion model
2. Sagittal suture expansion surgery
3. Double labeling of mineralized bones
4. EdU staining
5. Micro-computed tomography imaging
6. Preparation of work solution for PEGASOS tissue clearing
7. Transparency of calvarial bones with the PEGASOS method
8. Imaging
NOTE: Confocal microscopy was used for 3-D visualization of transparent tissues in this study. Light-sheet microscopy is also appropriate for this protocol. Several operating systems have been verified as available before. Here, a laser confocal microscope operating system is taken as an example (see Table of Materials).
Using this protocol, a mouse model for sagittal suture expansion has been established (Figure 1–2). For 3-D visualization of bone modeling changes after suture expansion, the PEGASOS tissue clearing method was applied to the entire calvarial bones following expansion. After perfusion, calvarial bones were separated (Figure 3A), and the appropriate PEGASOS process was continued (Table 1 and Table 2). Remarkably, calvarial bones became almost transparent after the complete PEGASOS process, regardless of whether decalcification was performed (Figure 3B,C).
To quickly visualize the changes after expansion, µCT was used on the collected and fixed samples. In comparison to the control group (Figure 4A), the cranial suture gradually and significantly expanded after applying force for 1 day (Figure 4B). By the fifth day, fluffy bony protrusions appeared on the bone edge (Figure 4C).
For three-dimensional visualization of the mineralization juxtaposition rate in the entire suture after expansion, the dual labeling method was employed along with the efficient PEGASOS technique, even on non-decalcified calvarial bones (Figure 5). Under physiological conditions, there were minor changes between prior-post labeling signals (Figure 5A), while force loading significantly activated osteogenesis. The zigzag pattern of newly mineralized bone, labeled with a single calcium yellow-green marker, widened after expanding for 7 days (Figure 5B,C). In high-resolution three-dimensional visualization, the pattern changes of marginal bones indicated the bone remodeling process after suture expansion, and the degree of newly formed bone varied on two sides of the sutures (Figure 5C).
Furthermore, to visualize the proliferation rate of cells upon suture expansion, whole-mount EdU incorporation was attempted using the PEGASOS tissue clearing method with a calcification process. Successfully, the labeling was efficient and well-preserved in cleared tissues. In the control group, several EdU+ cells were diffusely distributed throughout the sutures (Figure 6A), which might be important for physiological bone remodeling and possibly overlooked in 2-D sectioning. Upon expanding for 1 day, the proliferating cells peaked in the middle and edges of the sutures (Figure 6B). As the suture widened, the number of proliferating cells decreased over time, reaching day 7 (Figure 6C). The highlighted cells were small round cells in the bone marrow, indicating blood cells, which differed from the EdU+ suture cells (Figure 6C).
Figure 1: Vital materials were prepared for surgery. Retention holders were made of stainless steel wire. Their diameters were 2 mm, and 1 mm tails were reserved on two sides (A). The pressure spring with 0.2 mm wire diameter, 1.5 mm external diameter, 1 mm interval space was applied (B). The tensile force was detected by a dynameter (C,D). Each 1 mm spring compression obtained a thrust of about 30 g (E) in this experiment. Scraps of paper were cut into the shape of kites with 2 mm diameters to use as the barriers (F). Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 2: The surgical process for suture expanding mouse model. After flipping the calvarial flap, acid etching (A) as well as bonding (B) were done at the position where the retention holders would be exposed. After resetting the scalp flap (C), the holders were exposed at the marked position (D). A spring was set between two holders to exert expansion force on the calvarial suture, and two scraps of paper were fixed at both ends of the spring as barriers (E,F) after confirming that the holders were bonded firmly. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 3: PEGASOS tissue clearing procedure was applied for two calvarial bones with or without decalcification. After perfusion, calvarial bones were separated, with some blood-stained and soft tissues attached (A). Calvarial bones that have experienced the decalcification process (B) or with non-decalcification (C) were almost completely transparent after the whole process of PEGASOS. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 4: Calvarial sutures expanded gradually after exertion of tensile force. µCT images of sagittal suture without force loading (A) and after force loading for 1 day and 5 days (B,C). Scale bar: 100 µm. Exp = expansion. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 5: Osteogenesis activated after suture expansion in 3-D images. (A–C) Three-dimensional visualization of double-labeled sagittal sutures cleared by the PEGASOS method. Alizarin red and Calcein green were intraperitoneally injected overnight before expansion and before euthanizing after expanding for 7 days (B,C), respectively, compared with the control group without mechanical loading at the same time points (A). 5x lens was used to acquire the whole suture images efficiently (A,B), and the box image in (B) was enlarged in (C, C', C'') imaged with a 10x lens. Scale bar in A,B: 100 µm, C: 150 µm. Exp = expansion. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Figure 6: Suture cells highly proliferated upon tensile force loading in 3-D images. Whole-mount incorporation assays combined with the PEGASOS tissue clearing method displayed the proliferating cells in the whole suture when in quietness (A) or after force loading for 1 day and 7 days (B,C). Imaged with a 10x lens. Dash lines outline two edges for sagittal sutures. Scale bar: 100 µm. Exp = expansion. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
Processes | Solutions | Time & Temperature |
1. Intraperitoneal injection | 1 mg/10 g EdU | 2 h before euthanizing the mice |
2. Perfusion | 0.02% Heparin & 0.05 mol/L EDTA | / |
3. Fixation | 4% PFA | O/N, 4 °C |
4. Decalcification | 10% EDTA | 2 days, 37 °C |
5. Decolorization | 25% Quadrol | 1 day, 37 °C |
6. EdU staining | labeling cocktail | 1 day, RT |
7. Degreasing | 30% tert-Butanol | 2 h, 37 °C |
50% tert-Butanol | 2 h, 37 °C | |
70% tert-Butanol | 2 h, 37 °C | |
8. Dehydration | TB-PEG solution | 3 h*2, 37 °C |
9. Clearing | BB-PEG solution | 2 h, 37 °C |
Table 1: PEGASOS tissue clearing procedure for calvarial bones with EdU staining.
Processes | Solutions | Time & Temperature |
1. Intraperitoneal injection | 20 mg/kg Alizarin red | overnight before expansion |
2. Intraperitoneal injection | 5 mg/kg Calcein | overnight before collection |
3. Perfusion | 0.02% Heparin & 0.05 mol/L EDTA | / |
4. Fixation | 4% PFA | O/N, 4 °C |
5. Decolorization | 25% Quadrol | 1 day, 37 °C |
Table 2: PEGASOS tissue clearing procedure for calvarial bones with double labeling of mineralized bones by Calcein green and Alizarin red.
We applied a standard suture expansion mouse model to observe the regular morphological changes that occur every week during the entire month-long remodeling cycle10. This model is useful for researching calvarial bone remodeling and regeneration by expanding calvarial sutures, as well as for studying various suture cells in vivo. To fully present the results of such research, three-dimensional visualization of stained tissues is needed. Therefore, PEGASOS technology, known for its efficiency in clearing hard tissue19,20, was combined with dual labeling and EdU staining to reveal expanded mineralization rates and proliferating cells during the expansion process.
Regarding suture expansion surgery, one of the key steps is the bonding of the retaining ring. To ensure a firm bond with the bone surface, we standardized the acid etching and bonding process at the bottom of the retainer ring. The small loops on the retainer ring should be perpendicular to the bone surface and correspond to small holes on the scalp. After suturing the scalp, the small loops should be exposed to the skin surface through small holes in a natural and balanced state to avoid the retention ring collapsing during the installation of the force-applying spring and guide wire, which could lead to surgery failure. Additionally, selecting a suitable force-applying spring is vital for successful surgery, as it makes installing the spring easier while preventing the retention ring from falling off and achieving the intended force application.
Compared to previous models, this model offers several advantages. Firstly, it prevents the formation of circular bone defects in the parietal bone, preserving the cell activation mode. Furthermore, the force can be removed at any time by disassembling the spring, making it suitable for establishing a recurrence model after stress stretching. The convenience of disassembling the spring also ensures minimal secondary damage to the experimental animals. Moreover, the mechanical magnitude of tensile stress can be easily adjusted by changing the spring force. Importantly, this model maintains the natural physiological environment around the cranial suture, thus ensuring the accuracy of experimental results.
However, there are some limitations to this expansion model. Firstly, there is a risk of the retention ring falling off if the force is excessive. Novices should conduct preliminary exercises in spring installation to mitigate this risk. Secondly, there is a risk of infection when opening the scalp and exposing the skull, so instrument disinfection is essential, and shortening the surgery duration is beneficial for healing. Over-anesthesia may also lead to the death of mice.
Regarding the passive PEGASOS method, it is applicable to achieving transparency in individual tissues and organs, as well as the entire head and body of young mice. While efficient for whole calvarial bones, a longer processing time is required for larger samples, especially for whole bone tissues or bulk long bone tissues with joints. It’s important to note that tissue decalcification should not be conducted when using the double labeling protocol, as it interferes with the staining process. PEGASOS tissue clearing method is also flexible, allowing combination with various labeling methods, not limited to EdU incorporation or calcium double labeling, but also endogenous fluorescence in transgenic mouse models or whole-mount dye or antibody staining, all with well-preserved fluorescence.
With stable effects and high repeatability, this suture expansion model is suitable for various strains of transgenic mice of different ages. The ability to adjust the magnitude of tensile stress and withdraw force at any time enables convenient research on recurrence after stress stimulation. By combining the double labeling method of mineralized bones with the PEGASOS tissue clearing technique, we can observe the three-dimensional spatiotemporal distribution of cranial suture stem cells during bone remodeling, enabling further exploration of the relationship between SUSCs and mechanical stress, as well as its specific mechanisms.
The authors have nothing to disclose.
We thank for the laboratory platform and assistance of Ear Institute, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine. This work was supported by Shanghai Pujiang Program (22PJ1409200); National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.11932012); Postdoctoral Scientific Research Foundation of Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine;Fundamental research program funding of Ninth People's Hospital affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine (JYZZ154).
37% Acid etching | Xihubiom | E10-02/1807011 | |
Alizarin red | Sigma-Aldrich | A3882 | |
AUSTRALIAN WIRE | A.J.WILCOCK | 0.014'' | |
Benzyl benzoate | Sigma-Aldrich | B6630 | |
Calcein green | Sigma-Aldrich | C0875 | |
Copper(II) sulfate, anhydrous | Sangon Biotech | A603008 | |
Dynamometer | Sanliang | SF-10N | |
EDTA | Sigma-Aldrich | E9884 | |
EdU | Invitrogen | E104152 | |
Laser Confocal Microscope | Leica | SP8 | |
PBS | Sangon Biotech | E607008 | |
PEG-MMA 500 | Sigma-Aldrich | 447943 | |
PFA | Sigma-Aldrich | P6148 | |
pH Meters | Mettler Toledo | S220 | |
Quadrol | Sigma-Aldrich | 122262 | |
Sodium Ascorbate | Sigma-Aldrich | A4034 | |
Sodium bicarbonate | Sangon Biotech | A500873 | |
Sodium chloride | Sangon Biotech | A610476 | |
Sodium hydroxide | Sigma-Aldrich | S5881 | |
Spring | TAOBAO | 0.2*1.5*1*7 | |
Sulfo-Cyanine3 azide | Lumiprobe | A1330 | |
tert-Butanol | Sigma-Aldrich | 360538 | Protect from light. Do not freeze. |
Transbond MIP Moisture Insensitive Primer |
3M Unitek | 712-025 | |
Transbond XT Light Cure Adhesive Paste |
3M Unitek | 712-035 | |
Triethanolamine | Sigma-Aldrich | V900257 | |
Tris-buffered saline | Sangon Biotech | A500027 |