Erratum: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

2023年3月17日

この記事について

サマリー

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?. Figure 1 was updated.

要約

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?. Figure 1 was updated from:

Delivery outcomes chart comparing cesarean, eutocic, instrumented births; data 2014-2018.
Figure 1: Comparison of type of delivery: General pregnant population in 2018, ECV cohort between 2014-2018, Successful ECV cohort between 2014-2018. * Chi-squared test: p<0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

to:

Delivery mode comparison chart: cesarean, eutocic, instrumented, ECV success 2014-2018 percentages.
Figure 1: Comparison of type of delivery: General pregnant population in 2018, ECV cohort between 2014-2018, Successful ECV cohort between 2014-2018. * Chi-squared test: p<0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

開示事項

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
No conflicts of interest declared.

再版と許可

このJoVE記事のテキストまたは図の再利用許可をリクエスト

許可をリクエスト

タグ

External Cephalic VersionECV ProcedureDelivery OutcomesChi squared TestFigure UpdateObstetric InterventionBreech PresentationMaternal Fetal MedicineClinical Trial CorrectionData Visualization