Erratum: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

March 17th, 2023

In This Article

Summary

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?. Figure 1 was updated.

Abstract

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?. Figure 1 was updated from:

Delivery outcomes chart comparing cesarean, eutocic, instrumented births; data 2014-2018.
Figure 1: Comparison of type of delivery: General pregnant population in 2018, ECV cohort between 2014-2018, Successful ECV cohort between 2014-2018. * Chi-squared test: p<0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

to:

Delivery mode comparison chart: cesarean, eutocic, instrumented, ECV success 2014-2018 percentages.
Figure 1: Comparison of type of delivery: General pregnant population in 2018, ECV cohort between 2014-2018, Successful ECV cohort between 2014-2018. * Chi-squared test: p<0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Disclosures

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
No conflicts of interest declared.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

External Cephalic VersionECV ProcedureDelivery OutcomesChi squared TestFigure UpdateObstetric InterventionBreech PresentationMaternal Fetal MedicineClinical Trial CorrectionData Visualization