18.15
반복 게임은 동일한 참가자가 동일한 게임을 여러 번 하는 시나리오입니다. 이러한 게임은 의사 결정 과정이 시간이 지남에 따라 어떻게 진화하는지 이해하는 데 기본이 됩니다.
유한 반복 게임: 이러한 게임은 특정 횟수만큼 발생합니다.
경쟁 관계에 있는 두 소프트웨어 회사가…
반복되는 게임에는 동일한 플레이어로 동일한 게임을 여러 번 플레이하는 것이 포함됩니다. 이러한 게임은 시간이 지남에 따라 의사 결정이 어떻게 진화하는지 이해하는 데 중요합니다.
유한하게 반복되는 게임은 특정 횟수만큼 진행됩니다.
5월부터 8월까지 두 개의 레모네이드 가판대가 경쟁한다고 가정해 보겠습니다.
매월 초에 그들은 더 나은 이익을 위해 가격을 높게 유지할 것인지 아니면 더 많은 고객을 유치하기 위해 낮게 유지할 것인지 결정합니다.
두 스탠드가 높은 가격을 설정하여 협력하기로 동의한다고 가정합니다.
마지막 달이 다가옴에 따라 플레이어는 보복이나 협력을 위한 향후 라운드가 없다는 것을 알고 전략을 조정합니다.
8월까지 두 가판대 모두 더 많은 고객을 확보하기 위해 가격을 인하할 것으로 보입니다.
각 스탠드는 다른 스탠드가 마지막 달에 가격을 인하할 것으로 예상합니다. 따라서 7월부터 가격을 인하하기 시작할 수 있습니다.
이 논리는 첫 달까지 거슬러 올라가며 둘 다 처음부터 낮은 가격으로 설정되어 있습니다.
게임이 결국 끝날 것이라는 것을 알면 처음부터 경쟁 전략을 채택하도록 장려합니다.
게임을 거꾸로 푸는 이 방법을 역방향 유도(backward induction)라고 합니다.
View the full transcript and gain access to JoVE Business videos
Q1: What are finitely repeated games and how do they differ from one-time games?
Finitely repeated games occur when the same game is played a specific number of times by the same participants, unlike one-time games played only once. This predetermined endpoint fundamentally changes player behavior. Knowing the game will end encourages players to adopt competitive strategies earlier than they might in indefinite scenarios. The finite nature creates strategic pressure that evolves as players approach the final round.
Q2: How does backward induction explain player behavior in finitely repeated games?
Backward induction is a method of solving games by working backward from the final round. Players anticipate that in the last round, there is no opportunity for retaliation or future cooperation, so they adopt competitive strategies. Knowing this, players expect competitors to act competitively in earlier rounds too, causing them to reduce cooperation progressively backward through all rounds.
Q3: Why do competitors lower prices or cut costs from the beginning of a finitely repeated game?
Players lower prices or cut costs from the start because backward induction reveals that competitive behavior is inevitable by the final round. Anticipating this outcome, each player reasons that maintaining high prices or investments earlier is futile. This logic cascades backward through all rounds, causing both competitors to adopt cost-saving strategies immediately, even though sustained cooperation would yield higher collective profits.
Q4: What happens in the final round of a finitely repeated game?
In the final round, players are motivated to maximize immediate profits because no future rounds exist for retaliation or cooperation. Both competitors typically cut costs significantly or lower prices to capture more customers. Since there are no consequences for competitive behavior in the last round, players abandon any cooperative agreements they may have maintained in earlier rounds.
Q5: How does the finite nature of a game affect cooperation between players?
The finite nature of a game undermines cooperation because players know the relationship will end. As the final round approaches, the incentive to maintain cooperative agreements diminishes. Players recognize that competitors will eventually defect, so they defect first. This creates a race to competitive behavior that begins well before the final round, preventing sustained cooperation throughout the game.
Q6: Can two competitors maintain a high-price agreement throughout a finitely repeated game?
Maintaining a high-price agreement throughout a finitely repeated game is extremely difficult because backward induction reveals that both players will eventually defect. Each player knows the other will cut prices in the final round to maximize profit, so neither trusts the agreement. This anticipation of future defection causes players to abandon the agreement and adopt competitive strategies from the start.
Q7: How does game length influence strategic decision-making in repeated games?
Game length directly influences when players shift to competitive strategies. In finitely repeated games, knowing the exact endpoint causes players to adopt cost-saving or competitive strategies progressively earlier. The shorter the game, the sooner competitive behavior emerges. This demonstrates that the finite nature and known duration of a game fundamentally shape the dynamic evolution of strategic decision-making between competitors.