Erratum: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?

2023년 3월 17일

이 논문에서

요약

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?. Figure 1 was updated.

초록

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

An erratum was issued for: External Cephalic Version: Is it an Effective and Safe Procedure?. Figure 1 was updated from:

Delivery outcomes chart comparing cesarean, eutocic, instrumented births; data 2014-2018.
Figure 1: Comparison of type of delivery: General pregnant population in 2018, ECV cohort between 2014-2018, Successful ECV cohort between 2014-2018. * Chi-squared test: p<0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

to:

Delivery mode comparison chart: cesarean, eutocic, instrumented, ECV success 2014-2018 percentages.
Figure 1: Comparison of type of delivery: General pregnant population in 2018, ECV cohort between 2014-2018, Successful ECV cohort between 2014-2018. * Chi-squared test: p<0.05. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

공개 사항

$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
No conflicts of interest declared.

재인쇄 및 허가

이 JoVE 논문의 텍스트 또는 그림 재사용 허가 요청

허가 요청

태그

External Cephalic VersionECV ProcedureDelivery OutcomesChi squared TestFigure UpdateObstetric InterventionBreech PresentationMaternal Fetal MedicineClinical Trial CorrectionData Visualization