Bony Bar Formation
Bony Bar Formation - Related Videos
01:07
Bar Graph
0 Views •
2023
A bar graph is also called a bar chart and consists of bars that are separated from each other. It either uses horizontal or vertical bars to show comparisons among categories. The bars can be rectangles, or they can be rectangular boxes (used in three-dimensional plots). One axis of the graph represents the specific categories being compared, and the other axis shows a discrete value. In this graph, the length of the bar for each category is proportional to the number or percent of individuals...
09:41
Blast Quantification Using Hopkinson Pressure Bars
0 Views •
Cited by 2 •
2016
This protocol details the use of Hopkinson pressure bars to measure reflected blast loading from near-field explosive events. It is capable of interpolating a pressure-time history at any point on a reflective boundary and as such can be used to fully characterize the spatial and temporal variations in loading produced.
01:07
Multiple Bar Graph
0 Views •
2023
As the name suggests, a multiple bar graph is the same as a bar graph but has multiple bars to depict relationships between different data values. One can include as many parameters as possible. However, each parameter must have the same unit of measurement. Each bar or column in the multiple bar graph represents a data value. These graphs are used primarily in interrelating two or more sets of data. The categories of different kinds of data are listed along the horizontal or x-axis, whereas...
02:37
Standard Enthalpy of Formation
0 Views •
2020
Enthalpy changes are typically tabulated for reactions in which both the reactants and products are at the same conditions. A standard state is a commonly accepted set of conditions used as a reference point for the determination of properties under other different conditions. For chemists, the IUPAC standard state refers to materials under a pressure of 1 bar and solutions at 1 M and does not specify a temperature. Many thermochemical tables list values with a standard state of 1 atm. Because...
09:13
Gene Expression Profiling of Infecting Microbes Using a Digital Bar-coding Platform
0 Views •
Cited by 1 •
2016
We developed a protocol that is fast, sensitive and reproducible for pathogen gene expression profiling during an infection.
FAQs
After injury, infection, or another damaging event, healing can replace injured physeal cartilage with bone. When that repair connects regions on opposite sides of the physis, the resulting bridge does not expand like healthy growth-plate tissue. Its fixed attachment can restrain growth locally, creating a mismatch that may progress into a limb-length difference or angular deformity.
The bar’s location indicates which portion of the growth plate is affected, while its size describes how much of the physis has been replaced by bone. These features help clinicians estimate how strongly growth may be disturbed. Interpreting them together with the patient’s remaining growth supports prognosis and helps determine whether monitoring or intervention is appropriate.
Growth disturbance depends on where the tether affects the physis. If growth is restricted unevenly across the plate, one side may continue developing while the constrained region does not, producing angular change. A more extensive or differently positioned disturbance may instead contribute primarily to limb-length inequality. This relationship makes precise localization important for planning care.
Imaging helps identify the bar and characterize its location and size within the growth plate. It also supports assessment of how much growth remains and whether the existing disturbance could affect limb length or alignment. These findings provide the structural information needed to estimate prognosis and compare possible approaches, including observation or corrective treatment.
Management depends on the bar’s characteristics and its expected effect on remaining growth. Observation may be appropriate when the anticipated disturbance is limited, whereas guided growth or corrective osteotomy may address developing alignment problems. Surgical bar resection is reserved for carefully selected patients. The decision therefore links imaging findings with prognosis and the pattern of growth disturbance.
Treatment planning focuses on preventing or managing the two principal consequences of disrupted physeal growth: a difference in limb length and angular deformity. Imaging-based assessment helps determine whether the priority is monitoring progression, influencing alignment through guided growth, correcting established deformity with osteotomy, or considering bar resection in an appropriate patient.