Patient Consent
Patient Consent - Related Videos
10:39
3D-Neuronavigation In Vivo Through a Patient's Brain During a Spontaneous Migraine Headache
0 Views •
Cited by 14 •
2014
In this study, the authors report for the first time a novel 3D-Immersive & Interactive Neuronavigation (3D-IIN) through the impact of a spontaneous migraine headache attack in the μ-opioid system of a patient's brain in vivo.
05:53
Measuring Frailty in HIV-infected Individuals. Identification of Frail Patients is the First Step to Amelioration and Reversal of Frailty
0 Views •
Cited by 22 •
2013
Frailty syndrome is commonly seen in the aged and reflects multi-system physiological change. However, with reduced functional reserve and resilience frailty is also known to be common in the HIV infected population. This study outlined an easily administered screening test to identify HIV patients with frailty. When significant components of frailty are identified, clinicians will be able to focus on amelioration of the problem and promote reversion to the pre-frail state.
11:01
Examining the Characteristics of Episodic Memory using Event-related Potentials in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease
0 Views •
2011
The methodology for collecting high-density event-related potential data while patients with Alzheimer's disease perform a recognition memory task is reviewed. This protocol will include subject preparation, quality assurance, data acquisition, and data analysis.
09:32
Network Analysis of Foramen Ovale Electrode Recordings in Drug-resistant Temporal Lobe Epilepsy Patients
0 Views •
Cited by 5 •
2016
This protocol describes a procedure to track the evolution of mesial network measures in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients. It is based on the combination of intracranial recordings with a novel numerical technique for data analysis. Specifically, we present a protocol for network analyses of foramen ovale recordings.
08:10
Proper Adjustment of Patient Attire during the Physical Exam
0 Views •
2023
Source: Jaideep S. Talwalkar, MD, and Joseph Donroe, MD, Internal Medicine and Pediatrics, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT In order to optimize the predictive value of the physical examination, the provider must perform maneuvers correctly. The proper use of drapes is an important component of correctly performing physical examination maneuvers. Skin lesions are missed when "inspection" occurs through clothing, crackles are erroneously reported when the lungs are examined through a...
FAQs
Decision-making capacity determines whether a person can make the relevant clinical choice for themselves. Before proceeding, clinicians or researchers should confirm that the individual understands the information provided and can decide voluntarily. This check supports autonomy because agreement is meaningful only when it reflects the person’s own informed decision, rather than confusion or pressure.
Voluntariness means the decision comes from the individual without coercion. Consent is ethically meaningful only when a person can ask questions, consider the information, and choose freely rather than being pressured into examination, treatment, research participation, or data use. This safeguard preserves autonomy and helps distinguish genuine agreement from compliance that does not reflect the person’s wishes.
Consent should remain an ongoing process rather than a single completed event. If circumstances change, the information relevant to the decision may also change, requiring continued communication and an opportunity for the individual to ask questions or withdraw. Revisiting consent keeps the person’s choice aligned with the current examination, treatment, research, or data-use situation.
The discussion should make the decision’s purpose and procedures clear, then address foreseeable risks, potential benefits, and available alternatives. These elements allow the individual to compare options instead of responding to an unexplained request. Providing time to ask questions and confirming understanding further supports an informed choice in clinical care or research.
Consent may be documented in writing or in another approved format, depending on the applicable clinical or research process. Documentation provides a record that the discussion and decision were addressed, while the consent process itself still requires understanding, voluntariness, questions, and the option to withdraw. Recording agreement does not replace communication.
It is relevant to clinical examination, research participation, and data use as well as treatment. In each setting, the individual should receive information about the activity’s purpose, procedures, foreseeable risks, potential benefits, alternatives, and the ability to ask questions or withdraw. This broad scope makes consent important across both clinical practice and research.
By giving individuals a meaningful role in decisions about their examination, treatment, participation, or data, consent protects patient autonomy. Clear communication and respect for questions or withdrawal also strengthen trust between participants and healthcare professionals. In this way, the process supports ethical and legally appropriate decision-making rather than treating agreement as a purely administrative step.