Name: affiliation goals shape social mimicry
Uploaded: 2023-04-30T06:54:31.000Z
Duration: 10 min 31 s
Channel: JoVE

1. Participant Recruitment
<ol>
	<li>Conduct a power analysis and recruit a sufficient number of participants and obtain informed consent from the participants.</li>
	<li>Randomly assign participants to one of three conditions: Nonconscious affiliation prime, conscious affiliation goal, or no goal.</li>
</ol>
2. Data Collection
<ol>
	<li>Bring participants to a computer station and tell them that they will be completing several unrelated experiments, the first of which is a test of visual acuity (actually a subliminal priming task).</li>
	<li>Seat participants in front of the computer.
	<ol>
		<li>When sitting upright, make sure that the distance between their eyes and a fixation point in the center of the computer screen (three asterisks) should be approximately 99 cm (39 in.).
		<ol>
			<li>Marks can be made on the floor of the room and on the computer stand to ensure that the chair and monitor are the proper distance from each other.</li>
			<li>This ensures that the stimuli presented are outside of the participant&#39;s foveal visual field.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Note that all instructions should appear on the computer screen.
	<ol>
		<li>All characters presented on the computer screen should be black text on a white background.</li>
		<li>Participants will read that the researchers are interested in how quickly and accurately people respond to visual stimuli, and that very brief flashes will appear on the screen at unpredictable places and times.</li>
		<li>Their task is to decide as quickly and accurately as possible whether the flash appeared on the right or left side of the screen.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Emphasize to participants that because of the unpredictable timing and location of the flashes, the best way to detect all of them quickly is to keep their eyes focused on the fixation point-three asterisks-in the center of the screen at all times.</li>
	<li>Also have them place their index fingers on two keys labeled &#34;left&#34; and &#34;right&#34;.</li>
	<li>Watch as participants complete six practice trials and answer any questions they may have to ensure they understand the task. After the practice trials the actual task will begin.</li>
	<li>Have participants perform the priming task, based upon their group assignment.4
	<ol>
		<li>Nonconscious affiliation prime: Participants will be primed with four words related to the concept of affiliation: affiliate, friend, partner, and together.
		<ol>
			<li>Have the four words each appear 20 times on the computer screen in a random order, for a total of 80 trials.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Conscious affiliation goal: Participants will be complete a similar &#34;priming&#34; task (though this condition is not meant to subliminally prime any particular concept) and they will be primed with two words: neutral and background.
		<ol>
			<li>Have the two words each appear 40 times on the computer screen in a random order, for a total of 80 trials.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>No goal: Participants will be complete a similar &#34;priming&#34; task (though this condition is not meant to subliminally prime any particular concept) and they will be primed with two words: neutral and background.
		<ol>
			<li>Have the two words each appear 40 times on the computer screen in a random order, for a total of 80 trials.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Note the following stimulus design details.
		<ol>
			<li>Each stimulus word should flash for 60 ms and should be immediately followed by a 60-ms masking string of letters in the same location. The masking string can be &#34;XQFBZRMQWGBX&#34; (as originally designed)5 to present a variety of letter patterns and therefore to be structurally similar to the preceding stimulus words.</li>
			<li>The screen refresh rate should be 15 ms or faster, such that the presentation length of 60 ms is adequate to ensure that the stimulus words and masks are always exposed to the participants.</li>
			<li>The stimulus word and mask should appear at one of four locations on the computer screen equidistant from the fixation point at angles of 45&#176;, 135&#176;, 225&#176;, and 315&#176; (one in each of the four quadrants).</li>
			<li>Construct one randomized location order and give all participants the same sequence of locations.</li>
			<li>Within a particular location, place each word so that the center of the word is 7.6 cm from the fixation point. At this distance, the stimulus words will be within the parafoveal visual field (from 2&#176; to 6&#176; of visual angle) and outside the foveal visual field associated with conscious awareness.6,7</li>
			<li>Have the amount of time between word presentations (including the stimulus word and the mask) vary from 2 to 7 s to enhance the &#34;visual acuity/reaction time task&#34; cover story. All participants should receive one randomized order of time interval lengths.</li>
			<li>Because participants are told to focus on the central asterisks throughout the task, the stimulus words are flashed for 60 ms each, and 140 ms has been shown to be the minimum time required to move the eyes away from an initial fixation point toward a parafoveally presented stimulus word, it should not be possible for participants to see the stimulus words, even if they immediately looked toward the location of the flash.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>In the second phase of the experiment, have participants complete a memory task in which they are to remember the behaviors of another participant and the order in which they occurred (based on Chartrand and Bargh).4
	<ol>
		<li>Example behaviors of another participant: 
		Had a party for some friends last week 
		Helped a woman fix her bicycle 
		Checked some books out of a library 
		Wrote an articulate letter to his congressman 
		Subscribes to sports magazines 
		Jogs every morning before going to work 
		Volunteered to teach a Sunday school class at his church 
		Went skiing in Colorado for the weekend 
		Caught the error in the Mechanic&#39;s calculations 
		Read the bible in his hotel room</li>
		<li>Do not refer to the fact that the phrases describe behaviors, and do not mention whether the behaviors describe the same person.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Create two random orders of these various behaviors.
	<ol>
		<li>Present participants with one of the two orders and ensure that the random orders are completely crossed with condition.</li>
		<li>Present each behavior predicate for 8 s, with a 1-s pause before the next one.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Following the presentation of the various behaviors, have participants complete a 3-min filler task to eliminate any short-term memory effects (e.g., recency and primacy effects) on free recall.
	<ol>
		<li>As part of another ostensibly unrelated experiment, this filler task should require participants to generate arguments both for and against three controversial issues (i.e., abortion, gun control, and capital punishment).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Following this filler task, administer the surprise free-recall test. Give participants a maximum of 4 min to recall the exact order in which the behavior predicates were presented.</li>
	<li>Following the memory task, have participants watch a &#34;live feed&#34; of the other participant (actually a confederate videotaped earlier) performing four mundane clerical tasks in an adjoining room: filing papers, answering the phone, stapling papers, and typing at a computer.</li>
	<li>For participants in the conscious affiliation goal condition, explicitly state that they would soon be interacting with the person next door on a cooperative task for which it was very important to get along and work together well.</li>
	<li>After receiving these instructions, have participants watch the confederate, who will be touching her face during and between clerical tasks.</li>
	<li>While participants watch the tape, surreptitiously video-record them, so that independent coders (who will be unaware of the study&#39;s purpose and participant&#39;s condition) can measure the amount of face touching that the participant engaged in.</li>
	<li>After this final phase of the experiment, have participants complete a thorough debriefing that probes for (a) general suspicions (e.g., if they did not think the &#34;live feed&#34; video was real or, in the conscious-affiliation goal condition, that they would be interacting with a person next door), (b) what they thought the flashes were during the vigilance task, and (c) whether they noticed any particular mannerisms exhibited by the confederate.</li>
	<li>Measure interrater reliability.
	<ol>
		<li>Have two independent judges code the amount of time participants spend touching their faces while watching the videotape and compute inter-rater reliability.</li>
		<li>The dependent measure is amount of time spent face touching (s/min).</li>
		<li>NOTE: In the original study, one judge coded 100% of the tapes, and another coded 55% of the tapes. Interjudge reliability for the overlapping ratings was significant: r(28) = 0.98, p &#60; 0.001. The authors therefore averaged the two judges&#39; estimates of participants&#39; face touching for the overlapping ratings to form a single index. For the remaining participants, the single judge&#39;s estimates of face touching were used as the primary dependent measure.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
3. Data Analysis
<ol>
	<li>Compute a between-subjects one-way ANOVA with goal (nonconscious, conscious, no goal) as the independent variable and time spent face touching as the dependent variable.</li>
	<li>However, because the original authors predicted no differences in mimicry between two of the three groups, a planned comparison was also run to test their a priori hypothesis that participants with a conscious or nonconscious affiliation goal would mimic more than those without such a goal.</li>
</ol>

People mimic one another constantly, typically nonconsciously, which often results in improved feelings of rapport with another person (so long as the other person is not aware that they are being mimicked). This experiment finds evidence that nonconscious behavioral mimicry occurs when affiliation goals are present, whether those goals are subliminally primed or explicitly stated. This study also demonstrates that it is not necessary for a person to be physically present to be mimicked.
Build...

nonconscious mimicry occurs when affiliation goals are present

Source: Diego Reinero &#38; Jay Van Bavel&#8212;New York University
People are social chameleons and regularly engage in nonconscious behavioral mimicry. This occurs when an individual unwittingly imitates the behaviors of another person, such as crossing one's legs moments after a person sitting adjacent does so, or adjusting one's body posture to match a conversation partner. Rapport between two people increases behavioral mimicry, just as mimicry also increases rapport. Psychologists have posited that this mimicry is attributed to a perception-behavior link;1 seeing a person engage in a behavior activates that behavioral representation, which then makes the perceiver more likely to engage in that behavior him- or herself.
The following experiment expands on these previous findings by testing whether people, without intention or awareness, use mimicry to their advantage. Because goals activate behavioral strategies and plans of action that help people pursue those goals,2 Lakin and Chartrand hypothesized that individuals would mimic another person more when they have a goal to affiliate than when they do not.3

The results indicated that participants in both the nonconscious-affiliation goal and conscious-affiliation goal conditions exhibited more behavioral mimicry (i.e., face touching) than those in the no-goal condition (Figure 1). No significant differences existed between the nonconscious-affiliation and the conscious-affiliation conditions.
<img alt="Bar graph comparing face-touchin...

Nonconscious Mimicry Occurs when Affiliation Goals are Present

Source: Diego Reinero &#38; Jay Van Bavel&#8212;New York University
People are social chameleons and regularly engage in nonconscious behavioral mimicry. ...

Like chameleons, people blend in with their social environments by unknowingly changing their mannerisms to match another?s behaviors. This phenomenon is known as nonconscious mimicry.For example, an individual may cross his arms and adjust his posture moments after a co-worker performed those same behaviors. In this case, the imitation occurred automatically, without any personal connection. In situations where individuals do have rapport, like wanting to form a new company together, unconscious mimicry between the two may occur more often as a result of simply sharing the affiliation goal of being business partners. Based on the work of Lakin and Chartrand, this video demonstrates how to use an implicit procedure?priming?to establish affiliation goals in a laboratory setting, disguise the actual study and subsequently investigate whether or not individuals use mimicry in situations where it?s personally beneficial. In this experiment, participants? are divided into one of three groups (nonconscious affiliation prime, conscious affiliation goal, and no goal), asked to complete several tasks that are supposedly unrelated, and finally, must observe another person performing mundane clerical jobs. During the first task, those in the nonconscious affiliation priming condition are repeatedly exposed to stimuli onscreen that involve words, such as affiliate, friend, partner, and together, all of which are considered priming for the concept of affiliation.Participants in the conscious affiliation goal and no goal groups are similarly exposed to words?like neutral and background. However, the terms are not meant to subliminally prime any concept. In all trials, regardless of condition, each word is flashed for 60 ms at one of four locations outside the foveal visual field, and centered at 7.6 cm from the fixation point. In between words, a masking string of letters?structurally similar to the stimulus words?is also presented for 60 ms.These are all flashed at varying intervals of 2?7 s to enhance the cover story, in which participants think they are performing a visual acuity and reaction time task. Thus, they press a key labelled right or left depending on which side they perceived the flash. To further elude the truth behind the experiment, participants are then asked to complete a memory task. This time they are told to remember the order of a list of actions that another participant has completed. Following the presentation of various behaviors, participants are asked to generate arguments to debate controversial issues. This filler exercise eliminates the short-term memory effects such as recency and primacy effects. Afterwards, participants are given four minutes to recall the order that the behaviors were given. In the final key phase, participants watch a live feed of a confederate performing mundane clerical tasks such as filing papers, answering the phone, stapling papers, and typing at a computer. Only participants in the conscious affiliation goal group are explicitly told that they will soon be interacting with the person on a cooperative task where they will need to get along and work well together. All participants are filmed surreptitiously and during the feed, the confederate will be touching their face throughout the clerical tasks. The dependent variable is the amount of time the participant spends touching their face. The hypothesis is that the primed nonconscious and the explicit conscious affiliation goal groups would show more mimicry than the no goal controls, suggesting that affiliation?even unknowingly?increases mimicry. Before starting the experiment, conduct a power analysis to determine the appropriate number of participants required. To begin, greet each one in the lab and obtain consent to take part in the study. Explain that they will be doing three tasks, and that in the first one, they will complete a visual acuity test on the computer. In reality, this phase serves as a priming portion.Place participants 99 cm from a computer monitor on which the instructions for the test are displayed. Emphasize that the best way to detect all the flashes is to keep their eyes focused on the fixation point in the center of the screen at all times. Also point out what keys are used to indicate the left or right side.Watch the participant perform several trials, ensuring that the screen refresh rate is faster than 15 ms and stimuli appear for 60 ms. After answering any questions they may have, leave the room and allow them to complete all 80 trials without interruption. Depending on their random group assignment, notice that the number of words vary across conditions and appear repeatedly in a random order at one of four locations: Display affiliate, friend, partner, and together for the nonconscious affiliation priming group, and neutral and background for conscious affiliation goal, as well as the no goal controls. In the second phase, return and administer a memory recall task to avoid any suspicion on what the study is really investigating. From a list of 10 randomly ordered behaviors, instruct participants to remember them in the order they?re read. Say each one over 8 s, with a 1-s pause in between: "Had a party for some friends last week; Helped a woman fix her bicycle; Checked some books out of a library" Next, to eliminate any short-term memory effects, present a filler task where participants generate arguments for and against three controversial topics over a 3-min period. Afterwards, administer a surprise free-recall test and give the participant 4 min to recall the exact order in which they heard the previous behaviors: "Had a party for some friends last week; Helped a woman fix her bicycle; Checked some books out of a library". Note that their answers are not officially recorded for any subsequent analysis. In the third phase, inform them that they will be watching a live feed of another participant performing mundane clerical tasks. Before viewing, tell those in the conscious affiliation goal condition: "You will be soon interacting with the person in the video on a cooperative task for which it is very important to get along and work well together."Play the same video for all three groups, and surreptitiously record each one as they watch the feed.Lastly, thoroughly debrief all participants: Probe for suspicions, what they thought the flashes were, and if they noticed any mannerisms exhibited by the person in the feed. Thank them for taking part in the study. To analyze the data, have two judges who are unaware of the experimental conditions independently assess the amount of time participants spent touching their faces. Average the two judges? estimates across conditions and plot the results. Notice that compared to the no goal group, those in the affiliation groups?whether nonconscious or conscious?significantly spent more time touching their faces. Thus, this experiment demonstrates that nonconscious behavioral mimicry occurs when affiliation goals are present, whether they are subliminally primed or explicitly stated. In addition, it demonstrates that it is not necessary for a person to be physically present in order to be mimicked. Now that you are familiar with how nonconscious behavioral mimicry can occur when affiliate goals are present, let?s look at other social situations where rapport building is beneficial for human interaction.Mobile dating apps and websites could seek to boost the probability of cultivating a positive connection between two people by subliminally priming people once a match has been established but prior to any in-person meeting. For example, having the two people complete a word-search puzzle with romantic words may increase their romantic feelings towards each other. Furthermore, upon going out on a date, simply observing their behavior?if they mimic each other taking a sip of their drink?could allude to a shared goal of forming and strengthening a partnership. Such synchrony acts like social glue, binding a harmonious relationship. In addition, many companies emphasize the importance of affiliating with clients through the use of regular in-person or phone meetings. Establishing affiliation and a common goal helps to allow nonconscious behavioral mimicry and consequent rapport building to develop. You?ve just watched JoVE?s video on nonconscious behavioral mimicry. Now you should have a good understanding of how to design and execute an experiment with priming, how to analyze and assess the results, as well as how to apply the principles to a number of real-world situations. Thanks for watching!

nonconscious-mimicry-occurs-when-affiliation-goals-are-present

Education

JoVE Science Education

Psychology

Social Psychology

affiliation goals shape social mimicry

Nonconscious mimicry is a common part of social behavior. It happens when a person unwittingly copies another person's actions, such as crossing their legs after someone nearby does it or matching a conversation partner's posture. This kind of social chameleon behavior can happen without intention or awareness.

Mimicry is linked to rapport, which is the sense of connection or ease between two people. When rapport increases, behavioral mimicry often increases too. Psychologists have also proposed a perception-behavior link. In this idea, seeing a behavior activates that same behavior in the observer, which can make the observer more likely to do it.

The experiment described here looks at whether people use mimicry to help them reach a social goal. Lakin and Chartrand predicted that individuals would mimic another person more when they had a goal to affiliate, or connect with someone, than when they did not. The study tests whether people can change their behavior in this way without planning to do so or realizing it is happening.

Affiliation Goals Shape Social Mimicry

analyzing situations in helping behavior

Situational Forces in Helping Decisions

Helping behavior is shaped by social situations as well as by personality. Social psychologists and personality psychologists both try to predict human behavior, but they focus on different causes. Personality psychology looks at traits, character, and individual differences. Social psychology looks at the power of the situation.

using fmri to dissect moral judgment

fMRI and the Trolley Dilemma in Moral Choice

fMRI can be used to study how people make moral choices in the trolley dilemma and the footbridge dilemma. These two classic thought experiments help researchers compare the roles of reason and emotion in moral judgment. In the trolley dilemma, most people say it is appropriate to pull a switch to stop a train from hitting five people, even though the switch sends the train toward one person. In the footbridge dilemma, most people say it is inappropriate to push a large man off a bridge so his...

perspectives on social psychology

Social Psychology Experiments and Human Behavior

Social psychology examines how social situations shape people’s actions, thoughts, and attitudes. It uses the scientific method to study everyday interactions between people who may be near each other, far apart, or even online. This makes the field especially useful for understanding behavior in modern life. Some social psychology studies focus on ostracism, or social exclusion. The ostracism video shows a way to make people feel left out without any direct face-to-face contact. These kinds...

evaluating the accuracy of snap judgments

evaluating-the-accuracy-of-snap-judgments

How Fast Social Impressions Can Be Accurate

Social impressions can form quickly and still be accurate. Social psychologists study how people judge others, including how students evaluate their teachers from limited information. This topic also looks at why quick judgments can be useful in everyday life. Much research on person perception has focused on judgment errors. These errors include giving too much weight to central traits such as “warm” and “cold,” ignoring the situation in which behavior happens, and making judgments that fit...

a minority of one: conformity to group norms

a-minority-of-one-conformity-to-group-norms

Testing How Group Norms Shape Perception

Conformity is the tendency to match attitudes, behaviors, or beliefs to group norms. Psychologists in the early to mid 1900s studied how strong social influence can be on thought and behavior. This work was influenced in part by efforts to explain the behavior of Nazi soldiers in World War II. At the time, behaviorist psychology explained conformity as a kind of reinforcement learning. In that view, it can feel rewarding to follow the group. Gestalt psychologists argued for a different idea.

misattribution of arousal and cognitive dissonance

misattribution-of-arousal-and-cognitive-dissonance

Arousal Can Shape Emotions and Decisions

Psychological arousal can shape how people interpret their feelings, emotions, and choices. When arousal feels vague and has no clear cause, people may explain it using the situation around them. Research by Stanley Schachter and Jerome Singer helped show that this kind of misreading can change behavior. One classic study used a drug cover story to test this idea. Participants were told they were getting a vision drug called Suproxin, but they actually received epinephrine, which increases...

marginal dishonesty: the adding-to-10 task

marginal-dishonesty-the-adding-to-10-task

Self-Concept and Cheating in the Adding-to-10 Task

The Adding-to-10 Task is a social psychology method for studying cheating and self-concept maintenance. It examines how people may balance the wish to gain something with the need to see themselves as honest. The task is often used to explore marginal dishonesty, also called the “fudge factor.” Classical economic theory says people are rational and self-interested. The transcript explains that people also follow other goals. Financial motives can be outweighed by the need to keep a positive...

ostracism: effects of being ignored over the internet

ostracism-effects-of-being-ignored-over-the-internet

How Social Ostracism Affects Belonging

Social ostracism is being ignored and excluded in the presence of other people. It is a strong social experience that appears in both animals and humans. It also shows up across development, relationships, cultures, social groups, and institutions. Some researchers suggest that ostracism can help regulate social groups. In this view, removing unwanted members may support group cohesion and fitness. The feeling of being left out can also act as a warning to change behavior and try to rejoin the...

inducing emotions

Disgust, Sadness, and Money Choices

Disgust and sadness can change how people value money and objects. Psychologists and economists have found that emotions can shape behavior, including consumer choices, and these feelings do not always come from the transaction itself. Incidental emotions are emotions that are unrelated to the decision at hand, yet they can still affect buyers and sellers. Earlier research often focused on broad mood differences, such as positive versus negative feelings. More recent work looks at specific...

persuasion: motivational factors influencing attitude change

persuasion-motivational-factors-influencing-attitude-change

Persuasion and Message Processing Routes

Persuasion depends on how people process a message and on what part of the message they pay attention to. Social psychological research has long examined how people change their attitudes toward an idea, person, or object. This question matters in politics, marketing, and public health. Early work showed that two key factors can shape persuasion: the source of the message and the content of the message. An expert source and a message with strong arguments are often more persuasive. But later...

creating the minimal group paradigm

Testing In-Group Bias With Minimal Groups

Minimal groups are a way to test in-group bias in social psychology. Participants are randomly assigned to brand-new groups. This setup helps researchers study prejudice, conflict, and discrimination while removing factors like money and past history. Because the groups are novel, any effect comes from social identity itself. The method separates the social world into “us” and “them.” Research with minimal groups has shown that people can favor their in-group over an out-group even when group...

the implicit association test

Measuring Implicit Attitudes with the IAT

The Implicit Association Test, or IAT, measures implicit attitudes. These are attitudes that people may not report openly, even when they hold them. In social psychology, attitudes are often measured by asking people to self-report their beliefs, opinions, or feelings. That approach has limits when the topic is socially sensitive, such as racial prejudice. People may feel pressure to give unprejudiced, egalitarian answers, even if they have negative associations. The IAT was developed to get...

Nonconscious mimicry is a common part of social behavior. It happens when a person unwittingly copies another person's actions, such as crossing their legs after someone nearby does it or matching a conversation partner's posture. This kind of social chameleon behavior can happen without intention or awareness. Mimicry is linked to rapport, which is the sense of connection or ease between two people. When rapport increases, behavioral mimicry often increases too. Psychologists have also...

effects of thinking abstractly or concretely on self-control

effects-of-thinking-abstractly-or-concretely-on-self-control

Abstract vs Concrete Thinking and Self-Control

Abstract and concrete thinking can shape self-control and delay of gratification. Self-control often means choosing a long-term reward instead of a short-term one, such as skipping a second serving of ice cream, studying instead of going to a party, or saving money instead of spending it right away. Psychologists have studied self-regulation for decades. A person's mindset and focus can influence how they judge a choice and decide what to do. One theory that explains this is Construal Level...

thinking too much impairs decision-making

thinking-too-much-impairs-decision-making

Overthinking Can Skew Tough Choices

Overthinking can skew tough choices when people try to compare attractive options by listing pros and cons. This approach aims to turn a subjective choice into a clear set of criteria. Psychology research suggests that this kind of deep self-reflection does not always lead to the best outcome. The transcript also shows similar effects in other areas. People who ruminated, or kept thinking about a bad mood, improved less than people who were simply distracted. In another study, describing the...

social psychology

This collection features classical methods used to investigate how social contexts influence people's actions, thoughts, and attitudes and provides a transparent look into social experiments.

Explore how a goal to affiliate can increase nonconscious mimicry, from matching posture to subtle social copying, and why it may help build rapport.

Affiliation Goals Shape Social Mimicry

Description

Transcript

Tags