Name: measuring bacterial resistance with e-tests
Uploaded: 2023-04-30T07:10:10.000Z
Duration: 13 min 39 s
Channel: JoVE

K12 Standards

Louisiana Student Standards for Science

High School

Life Sciences

from-molecules-to-organisms-structures-and-processes

From Molecules To Organisms: Structures And Processes

HS-LS1-8

antibiotic-susceptibility-testing-epsilometer-tests-to-determine-mic

Antibiotic Susceptibility Testing: Epsilometer Tests to Determine MIC Values of Two Antibiotics and Evaluate Antibiotic Synergy

1. Epsilometer tests (E-tests)
<ol>
	<li>Set-up
	<ol>
		<li>Wear gloves and a lab coat</li>
		<li>Ready the workspace by sterilizing it using 70% ethanol</li>
		<li>Collect Mueller-Hinton agar plates (MHA plates)</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Preparing a McFarland turbidity standard No. 0.5
	<ol>
		<li>Prepare a 1% solution of barium chloride (BaCl2): 
		Add 1 gram anhydrous barium chloride (BaCl2) in 100 mL distilled water. Vortex well.</li>
		<li>Prepare a 1% solution of sulfuric acid (H2SO4): 
		Add 1 mL of concentrated H2SO4 in 99 mL of distilled water. Vortex well.</li>
		<li>Prepare a McFarland turbidity standard No. 0.5: 
		50 µL BaCl2 solution in 5 mL of 1% H2SO4 solution. Vortex the solution well to get a turbid suspension.</li>
		<li>Keep McFarland turbidity standard No. 0.5 in a foil-covered tube. Store at 25°C for a maximum of 6 months. Vortex well to a homogenous solution before use.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Preparing MHA plates
	<ol>
		<li>Scrape Streptococcus group G bacteria from blood agar plate using a sterile loop. Mix into 1mL of saline, and vortex to a suspension of the bacteria.</li>
		<li>Compare the suspension to a McFarland standard No. 0.5 to achieve the same turbidity in order to have the same inoculum size during the experiments. Adjust the concentration using either additional saline or bacteria.</li>
		<li>Inoculate the MHA plates by using a sterile cotton tipped applicator. Swab the plate gently to cover the surface. Proceed with one of the three methods described below (1.4-1.6).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Single antibiotic resistance test. Streptococcus group G, resistance to penicillin G or gentamicin
	<ol>
		<li>Place an E-test strip (either penicillin G or gentamicin) in the center of the MHA plate (Figure 1 A,B).</li>
		<li>Incubate for 18-20 hours, 37°C.</li>
		<li>Read the results. MIC is measured as the inhibition zone that intersects the graded antibiotic test strip (Figure 1 C,D).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Antibiotic susceptibility, E-test method on agar plates, microbial growth inhibition analysis." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig1.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1761830439000" data-alt="Figure 1"> 
Figure 1: Single E-test. Placement of an E-test strip of A) penicillin G and B) gentamicin on a Mueller Hinton agar plate covered with bacterial colonies of a group G streptococci before (A and B) and after (C and D) overnight incubation at 37°C 5% CO2. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig1large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<ol start="5">
	<li>Synergy testing cross-approach. Streptococcus group G, resistance to penicillin G and gentamicin.
	<ol>
		<li>Place two E-test strips with different antibiotics (e.g. penicillin G and gentamicin) on the inoculated MHA plate in a cross formation.
		<ol>
			<li>For the most accurate results, aim at placing the cross at an approximately 90° angle at the intersection between the scales at their MIC values, previously determined on single antibiotic resistance test (Figure 2 A).</li>
			<li>Note that once the strips are placed on the agar plate, they should not be moved, since some antibiotics may already have been absorbed by the plate. Therefore, it is more appropriate to maintain the strips at a slightly wrong angle (e.g. 85°) and up to 1-2 mm from the actual MIC-value. It is advised to run the experiment in triplicate to reduce this problem.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Incubate for 18-20 hours, 37°C.</li>
		<li>Read the results. MIC is measured as the inhibition zone that intersects the graded antibiotic test strip on each respective E-test strip (Figure 2 B).</li>
		<li>Use the formula for fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) (Equation 1) in order to determine synergy.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Antibiotic susceptibility test using E-test strips on agar plates, showing growth inhibition zones." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig2.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1761830439000" data-alt="Figure 2"> 
Figure 2: Synergism detection - cross test. Results of antimicrobial synergy testing of MIC of penicillin G and gentamicin on Streptococcus group G before (A) and after (B) incubation overnight at 37°C 5% CO2. A 90° angle is formed between the two individual MIC-values (penicillin G: 0.094 µg/mL, gentamicin: 8 µg/mL). <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig2large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<ol start="6">
	<li>Synergy testing non-cross approach. Streptococcus group G, resistance to penicillin G and gentamicin.
	<ol>
		<li>Place the E-test strip in the center of the MHA plate (Figure 3 A,D).</li>
		<li>Mark where the previously determined MIC value was on each strip.</li>
		<li>Incubate for 1 hour at room temperature.</li>
		<li>Discard the E-test strip for each MHA plate (Figure 3 B,E).</li>
		<li>Place the second E-test strip (containing a different antibiotic) on the area of the earlier removed strip respectively so that their MIC values will correspond to the mark and are aligned.</li>
		<li>Incubate for 18-20 hours, 37°C.</li>
		<li>Read the results. MIC is measured as the inhibition zone that intersects the graded antibiotic test strip on each respective E-test strip (Figure 3 C,F).</li>
		<li>In order to determine synergy, the formula for fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) is used (Equation 1).</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Bacterial growth assay on agar plates with antibiotic strips; analysis of susceptibility and resistance." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig3.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1761830439000" data-alt="Figure 3"> 
Figure 3: Synergism detection - non-cross test. Results of antimicrobial synergy testing of MIC of penicillin G and gentamicin on Streptococcus group G. A) Gentamicin strip (8 µg/mL centered) on top of Streptococcus group G bacteria, B) Removal of gentamicin strip, C) Combined gentamicin / penicillin G strip (0.094 µg/mL centered) on top of Streptococcus group G bacteria, D) Penicillin G strip (0.094 µg/mL centered), E) Removal of penicillin G strip, F) Combined penicillin G / gentamicin strip (8 µg/mL centered) on top of Streptococcus group G bacteria. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig3large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
2. Broth testing
<ol>
	<li>Set-up
	<ol>
		<li>Wear gloves and a lab coat</li>
		<li>Ready the workspace by sterilizing it using 70% ethanol</li>
		<li>Collect 15mL MH broth with 50% lysed horse blood and 20 mg/mL β-NAD (MH-F)</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>(Optional) Perform an E-test [Protocol 1] to determine the MIC on solid medium
	<ol>
		<li>While optional, such knowledge will allow for better experimental design (e.g. the concentrations of antibiotics added can be designed to surround the MIC value determined from the plate), improving the chances of a successful experiment.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Preparing a bacterial inoculum. As stated above, bacterial concentration can be estimated by OD nm measurements or McFarland turbidity standards
	<ol>
		<li>OD600 nm Method
		<ol>
			<li>Obtain a bacterial suspension with an established bacterial concentration</li>
			<li>Dilute the culture in MH-F broth to achieve an OD600 of 0.003</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>McFarland turbidity method
		<ol>
			<li>Put 15 mL MH-F broth in a sterile tube.</li>
			<li>Inoculate the MH-F broth with bacteria (from a plate) to a McFarland level. Vortex the solution vigorously. Pour the solution into a sterile Petri dish.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Preparing antibiotics
	<ol>
		<li>Determine the concentration of antibiotics desired
		<ol>
			<li>Identify the MIC value from the E- test (ex. 0.125 µg/mL for penicillin G and 8 µg/mL for gentamicin)</li>
			<li>Multiply the agar plate MIC value by 24-27, corresponding to four-seven 2x serial dilutions. This will be the starting concentration of antibiotics. (ex. for penicillin G, seven 2x serial dilutions: 0.125 µg/mL x 27 = 16 µg/mL; for gentamicin, four 2x serial dilutions 8 µg/mL x 24 = 128 µg/mL</li>
			<li>Multiply the desired starting value 100x in order to determine generate a stock concentration of the antibiotics (ex. stocks of 1.6 mg/mL penicillin G and 12.8 mg/mL gentamicin)</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Prepare a 100x antibiotic stock concentration accordingly
		<ol>
			<li>Dissolve the antibiotics in 10mL autoclaved water, and vortex to generate a stock solution (ex. 16 mg penicillin G and 128 mg gentamicin to create the above stocks)</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Add bacteria to microplate wells
	<ol>
		<li>Aliquot 200 µl MH-F broth containing bacteria inoculum to the wells in the first 3 rows of a 96-well microtiter plate for an experiment in triplicate.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Add antibiotics to microplate wells
	<ol>
		<li>Add 200 µL extra MH-F broth with bacteria to the first column of wells (A1, B1, C1) to bring the total volume to 400 µL.</li>
		<li>Add 4 µL of the stock concentration of antibiotics to the first column of wells. Since the sample contains 400 µL it will result in a 100x dilution of the antibiotics.</li>
		<li>Generate a 2x serial dilution by transferring 200 µL bacteria/antibiotics from A1 to A2, all the way to A11. Pipet vigorously between the dilutions. Repeat the step for additional rows.</li>
		<li>Remove 200 µL from the column 11 so the final volume in all wells are 200 µL.</li>
		<li>Leave the last column (A12, B12, C12) without antibiotics, as controls.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
	<li>Determine MIC values
	<ol>
		<li>Incubate the 96-well microtiter plate for 24 hours at 37°C without shaking.</li>
		<li>The MIC value is defined as the last well in the dilution series that exhibits no visible growth of bacteria (Figure 4). This value,however, can only be trusted if the original inoculum size was correct.</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Microdilution method with 96-well plate; graph showing antibiotic MIC for Penicillin G, Gentamicin." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig4.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1761830439000" data-alt="Figure 4"> 
Figure 4: MIC determination by broth dilution. MIC is here defined as the last well that exhibits clearness (no growth of bacteria) before it changes turbidity. Row are duplicates of the MIC value of penicillin G and row are duplicates of the MIC value of gentamicin, both versus an isolate of Streptococcus group G. A) actual experimental outcome, B) schematic interpretation of the values from A (grey = no growth; white = growth). <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig4large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<img alt="Bacterial dilution and plating diagram showing microtiter plate setup, PBS control, serial dilutions." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig5.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1761830439000" data-alt="Figure 5"> 
Figure 5: Schematic procedure of dilution series to count original bacteria concentration. Dilutions were performed as described (20 µL diluted in 180 µL for a 10x dilution series), and then 10 µL from the rows A-H are plated on two separate blood agar plates as indicated. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig5large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>
<ol start="8">
	<li>Determine original inoculum size 
	NOTE: Microbroth assays are highly sensitive for the original inoculum size used. An excessive inoculum size will give a false positive result, since the antibiotics added will not be able to inhibit growth any longer at that ratio. Therefore, it is critical to verify how much bacteria have been added to the microwells. While the data will not be available at the point of the experiment (due to the need of 24 hours incubation) it will serve as a control. If the number of added bacteria is within the stated concentration range, the MIC values can be trusted. If the inoculum was too high or too low, the experiment needs to be repeated.
	<ol>
		<li>Serially dilute the bacteria
		<ol>
			<li>Prepare a 96-well microtiter plate to dilute the original bacterial concentration in order to determine the inoculum size. The optimum is a volume of 200 µL with 105-6 bacteria. To perform the dilutions, first aliquot 180 µL sterile PBS to each well in B-H (in triplicate 1-3).</li>
			<li>Next, add 100 µl of bacterial solution to A (in triplicate 1-3).</li>
			<li>Generate a 10x serial dilution (in triplicate) by transferring 20 µl bacteria from A to B, pipet vigorously. Repeat the steps for C-H.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Plate the bacterial dilutions for inoculum size determination
		<ol>
			<li>Mark blood agar plates according to Figure 5.</li>
			<li>Transfer 10 µL from the serial dilution to the plate according to Figure 5.</li>
			<li>Incubate the plate at 37°C for 20-24 hours.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
		<li>Determine the bacterial inoculum size
		<ol>
			<li>Count bacterial numbers in spots within 5-50 colonies (Figure 6).</li>
			<li>Calculate the initial inoculum size by calculating the mean of the triplicate samples, multiply by the dilution factor (e.g. 10x for B samples, 100x for C samples, 1000x for D samples, etc.) and then by 100 to compensate for the spotting volume of 10 µL, resulting in the inoculum size in cfu/mL. If the inoculum is within 105-6 cfu/mL the MIC data can be trusted.</li>
		</ol>
		</li>
	</ol>
	</li>
</ol>
<img alt="Bacterial growth experiment; agar plate, colony count analysis, zones A-D, growth inhibitors tested." class="xfigimg" src="/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig6.jpg" data-altupdatedat="1761830439000" data-alt="Figure 6"> 
Figure 6: Determination of inoculum size. Bacteria inoculated according to figure 5 were incubated for 20-24 hours at 37°C and then counted. Row D has a good number of colonies to count (e.g. 5-50). Samples in A are undiluted, B is diluted 10x, C is diluted 100x, and D is diluted 1000x, and only 10 µL is plated in each spot. <a href="https://www.jove.com/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512fig6large.jpg" target="_blank">Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.</a>

Antibiotic resistance is a worldwide health problem. In order to determine resistance mechanisms of microbes, methods testing for synergy and antagonism with different antibiotics is crucial. The E-test method is rapid, easy to replicate, and can be used to investigate any synergistic potential of combination therapies. The broth dilution method can also be assessed to predict bactericidal activity. In order to investigate the resistance mechanisms of different microbes, knowledge of synergistic and antagonistic antibiot...

antibiotic susceptibility testing: epsilometer tests to determine mic values of two antibiotics and evaluate antibiotic synergy

Source: Anna Bläckberg1, Rolf Lood1 
1 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Infection Medicine, Biomedical Center, Lund University, 221 00 Lund Sweden
Knowledge of the interactions between antibiotics and bacteria is important in understanding how microbes evolve antibiotic resistance. In 1928, Alexander Fleming discovered penicillin, an antibiotic that exerts its antibacterial function by interfering with cell wall regeneration (1). Other antibiotics with diverse mechanisms of action have subsequently been discovered, including drugs that inhibit DNA replication and protein translation in bacteria; however, no new antibiotics have been developed in recent years. Resistance to current antibiotics has been increasing, resulting in severe infectious diseases that cannot be effectively treated (2). Here, we describe several methods to assess antibiotic resistance in bacterial populations. Each of these methods works, regardless of the mechanism of action of the antibiotics used, because bacterial death is the measured outcome. Antibiotic resistance is not only rapidly disseminated specifically through hospital settings, but also throughout society. In order to investigate such means of resistance, different methods have been developed including the Epsilometer test (E-test) and the broth dilution test (3).
The E-test is a well-established method and is a cost-effective tool that quantifies Minimal Inhibitory Concentration (MIC) data, the lowest concentration of an antimicrobial that inhibits visible growth of a microorganism. Depending on the bacterial strain and antibiotics used, the MIC value can vary between sub μg/mL to &gt;1000 μg/mL (4). The E-test is performed using a plastic strip containing a predefined antibiotic gradient, which is imprinted with the MIC reading scale in μg/mL. This strip is directly transferred on the agar matrix when applied to the inoculated agar plate. After incubation, a symmetrical elliptic inhibition zone is visible along the strip as bacterial growth is prevented. MIC is defined by the area of inhibition, which is the endpoint where the ellipse intersects the strip. Another common method to determine MIC is the microbroth dilution method. Microbroth dilution incorporates different concentrations of the antimicrobial agent added to a broth medium containing inoculated bacteria. After incubation, MIC is defined as the lowest concentration of antibiotic that prevents visible growth (5). It is also a quantitative method and can be applied to several bacteria. Disadvantages of this method include the possibility of errors when preparing the concentrations of the reagents and the large number of reagents required for the experiment. Measuring antibiotic resistance is imperative from both a clinical and research perspective, and these in vitro methods of investigating resistance are discussed and showcased below.
The profile of resistance for a specific bacterium can be applied in order to optimize antibiotic treatment to determine whether a patient would benefit from combination treatment versus single therapy. For the usage of more than one antibiotic at a single time, it is imperative to know their interactions with each other and if they have an additive, synergistic, or antagonistic effect. An additive effect can be seen when the joint effect of the antibiotics equals the potency of the individual antibiotics given at an equal dose. Synergy between antibiotics, on the other hand, is present when the joint effect of the antibiotics is more potent than if the drug would be given alone (6). Applying combinations of antimicrobial treatment is used to avoid the occurrence of antimicrobial resistance thus to enhance the effect of the individual antibiotic treatment (7). Knowledge of antagonism is also as important to prevent unnecessary use of antimicrobial combinations. E-test methodology offers simple and several ways to determine possible synergy and antagonism between different antimicrobial agents. In order to face the proliferation of antibiotic resistant pathogens, knowledge of possible synergistic and antagonistic mechanisms of certain antibiotics is important resulting in clinical efficacy and battling multidrug-resistance.
Determination of synergy using E-tests can be divided into two broad approaches: cross and non-cross testing. While both synergy tests rely on the previous knowledge of individual MIC values, the two approaches are slightly different in methodology and conceptual approach. In a non-cross synergy test, the first antibiotic in the pair to be tested is placed on an agar plate inoculated with bacteria. After allowing the antibiotics from the first strip infuse the plate (e.g. after 1 hour), the strip is removed and a new strip containing the second antibiotic is placed on the exact same spot as the first, making sure to place the two individual MIC values on top of each other. The resulting inhibition zone can then be analyzed as described above, and synergy calculated based on the Equation 1.
Equation 1 - Fractional Inhibitory Concentrations (FIC)
<img src="/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512eq1.jpg" alt="FIC Index equation for antimicrobial synergy analysis, formula for drug combination effectiveness." data-altupdatedat="1761830439000">
Values &gt;0.5 demonstrates synergy.
While rewarding the examiner with easy-to-analyze plates, the method is somewhat laborious and time-consuming due to the change of strips, as well as the need of using two plates per experiment. Instead, a cross test is often employed. Instead of adding the two different E-test strips subsequently on top of each other (after removal of the first), both are placed simultaneously but in the form of a cross (<img align="center" src="/files/ftp_upload/10512/10512eq3.jpg" alt="Static equilibrium; ΣFx=0, ΣFy=0 diagram; force vectors, balance analysis." data-altupdatedat="1761830439000"> 90° angle), with the two previously determined MIC values forming the 90° angle. By this approach only one plate is needed per synergy test, as well as less work, making it a preferred choice despite being slightly more difficult to analyze. The new MIC values in the combined antibiotics approach can be visualized as the modified inhibition zones, after which synergy can be determined by Equation 1.
Instead of using an agar plate approach, a microbroth approach can often be preferential due to its higher flexibility (e.g. ability to choose specific concentrations of antibiotics outside the limits of an E-test strip). Further, microbroth tests are suggested to be more sensitive due to their even distribution of antibiotics in a liquid solution, not depending on the dissociation within a solid phase (agar plate). Wells in a 96-well microplate will be inoculated with a set number of bacteria (106 cfu/mL: bacterial concentration can be estimated by OD600 nm measurements, turbidity standards, or by spread plating samples from 10x bacterial serial dilutions), and antibiotics in different dilutions will be added to the wells. Similarly, to the E-test strips MIC is determined as the intersection (well/spot) with the lowest concentration of antibiotics inhibiting visible growth of bacteria.
Experimental Aim
<ul>
	<li>The project below describes strategies to determine MIC-values of penicillin G and gentamicin of Streptococcus group G by two different methods, E-test and microbroth dilution. For E-test, Mueller-Hinton agar plates inoculated with Streptococcus group G were used in combination with gradient strips of penicillin G and/or gentamicin; while MH-broth with 50% lysed horse blood and 20 mg/mL β-NAD were used with soluble antibiotics together with Streptococcus group G in a microbroth approach.</li>
</ul>
Materials
<ul>
	<li>Bacterial colonies on a blood agar plate, stored &lt;7 days in 4°C</li>
	<li>Blood agar plates</li>
	<li>0.5 McFarland standard
	<ul>
		<li>1% BaCl2</li>
		<li>1% H2SO4</li>
	</ul>
	</li>
	<li>Saline tube (2 mL)</li>
	<li>Cotton tipped applicator</li>
	<li>Mueller-Hinton agar plates (MHA plates)</li>
	<li>MH broth with 50% lysed horse blood and 20 mg/mL β-NAD (MH-F)</li>
	<li>E-test penicillin/gentamicin (or antibiotics of interest) (BioMerieux, Marcy l'Etoile, France, Sweden)</li>
	<li>Antibiotics penicillin/gentamicin (or antibiotics of interest (powder/solution))</li>
</ul>
Note: The specific media used for bacterial growth may vary for different species.

MIC values in E-test 
Individual MIC values were identified in Figure 1 as 0.094 μg/mL for penicillin G and 8 μg/mLfor gentamicin. For synergy tests, both demonstrated an MIC value for penicillin G of 0.064 μg/mL (Figures 2, 3), while gentamicin had an MIC 4 μg/mL for cross and non-cross tests. Note a slight discrepancy between the cross and non-cross tests may occur due to the different incubation times of the strips in the two settings.
...

Source: Anna Bl&#228;ckberg1, Rolf Lood1
1 Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Infection Medicine, Biomedical Center, Lund University, 221 ...

Antibiotic susceptibility is defined as the sensitivity of a bacteria to antibiotics and can be measured using a broth dilution test or an Epsilometer test, also called an E-test.In the broth dilution method, a standardized number of bacteria are added to a growth media containing serial antibiotic dilutions. If susceptible, the bacteria cannot grow at the higher antibiotic concentrations but continue to multiply at the lower antibiotic concentrations, causing media to turn turbid. The lowest antibiotic concentration at which the bacteria can no longer survive or multiply is referred to as the minimum inhibitory concentration, or MIC, value of the antibiotic for the given bacteria.In an E-test, a plastic strip impregnated with a predefined gradient of antibiotic is applied over a freshly spread lawn of bacteria on a Mueller-Hinton agar, or MH-A, Petri plate. The antibiotic diffuses out into the agar media, where it is taken up by the bacteria. If susceptible, the bacteria cannot multiply and will die off, forming a clear zone around the E-strip, which is referred to as the growth inhibition zone. At the point where the growth intersects with the E-strip, the corresponding value on the scale gives the MIC value of the antibiotic.Often antibiotics are used in combination to prevent the emergence of antibiotic resistant strains of bacteria. This often results in a synergistic, rather than additive, effect. Synergistic means that the combined effect of the two antibiotics is greater than the sum of their individual activities. However, the effect is considered significant only when the MIC value of the antibiotic combination decreases by at least two-fold. This criterion is evaluated by calculating the fractional inhibitory concentration, or FIC, index. By summing the ratio of the MIC of each antibiotic in combination with the MIC of each antibiotic individually, an FIC index less than 0.5 indicates synergy.Antibiotic synergy can be measured using two E-test based methods: a non-cross test or a cross test. In a non-cross test, first, the E-strips for two different antibiotics with predetermined MIC values are applied to two separate plates. After the antibiotics have diffused into the medium, the original E-strips are removed and the E-strips for the alternate antibiotics are placed such that their MIC scales lay exactly over the MIC scales of the previous strips. In a cross test, which is a faster version of the non-cross test, the E-strips of the two antibiotics are placed together in a cross formation, such that the scales of their MIC marks form a 90 degree angle at the intersection. Following incubation in both techniques, the MIC value of each antibiotic in combination with the other antibiotic is read at the point where the growth inhibition zone intersects with the edge of the E-strip. Then, the FIC index is calculated.This video will demonstrate how to determine the MIC value of a given antibiotic for a given bacteria using an E-test and a micro broth dilution test. You will also learn how to determine synergy between two antibiotics using a cross test and a non-cross test.To begin, put on any appropriate personal protective equipment, including laboratory gloves and a lab coat. Next, sterilize the work space using 70% ethanol. Next, collect 15 milliliters of sterile Mueller-Hinton broth with 50% lysed horse blood and 20 milligrams per milliliter beta-nicotinamide. And five to eight Mueller-Hinton agar plates. Now, to prepare a McFarland turbidity standard number 0.5, measure out 9.95 milliliters of 1% sulfuric acid solution. Then, add 50 microliters of 1% barium chloride solution to the sulfuric acid solution. Vortex the solution well to obtain a turbid suspension. Cover the tube with aluminum foil and set it aside. Next, dispense one milliliter of saline solution into a 15 milliliter tube.Use a sterile loop to scrape up a sample of the bacterial growth from your bacterial test plate, here, Streptococcus group G. Then, place the bacteria-laden loop into the saline solution, stir gently, and then vortex the tube well. Now, place the bacterial suspension and McFarland turbidity standards side by side and compare them for turbidity equivalence. Add either additional saline or bacterial colonies until the bacterial suspension's turbidity matches that of the standard. Once the desired turbidity is obtained, dip a sterile cotton tip applicator into the bacterial suspension. To inoculate the MH-A plate, swab the entire surface of the plate gently with a zigzag motion. Next, label the bottom sides of the plates with the name of the bacteria and the date.To begin, take out a penicillin G E-test strip, holding it by the edge with forceps. Gently place strip into the center of the freshly swabbed MH-A plate and replace the lid. In this example, a second antibiotic, gentamicin, is also tested. Thus, the strip placement process is repeated with the second plate and a gentamicin E-test strip. To determine the results of the E-test, collect the first plate that contains the penicillin G E-test strip. Now, determine the point where the inhibition zone intersects with the antibiotic strip. Read the corresponding numerical value on the scale. This value represents the MIC value of penicillin G. Determine the MIC value for gentamicin in the same manner.To begin, inoculate an MH-A plate with Streptococcus group G strain bacteria. Label the bottom of the plate with the name of the bacteria, antibiotics to be used, and the date. Now, place an E-test strip for the antibiotic of interest in the center of the plate. Then, hold the second test strip at a 90 degree angle to the first strip and locate its MIC mark. Gently lay the second E-strip over the first at the point where the two MIC values intersect. Once the strips are placed, do not move them. Next, incubate the plates at 37 degrees celsius for 18 to 20 hours.After inoculating two MH-A plates, with Streptococcus group G strain bacteria, place an E-test strip for one antibiotic on the surface of one plate. Then, place an E-test strip for the other antibiotic on the second plate as demonstrated. Using a plastic inoculation loop, mark the MIC value of each antibiotic on the surface of its respective plate. Next, cover the plates and incubate them at room temperature for one hour. After this, use forceps to remove the E strips. Next, collect one of the plates and an E-test strip for the other antibiotic. Hold the E-test strip over the imprint left by the first strip and locate the point where the MIC value on the E strip aligns with the marked line. Gently place the strip at this intersecting point. Repeat this process for the second plate and incubate both plates at 37 degrees celsius for 18 to 20 hours.First, obtain a bacterial suspension with an established bacterial concentration and dilute the culture in MHF broth to achieve an OD600 of 0.003. Next, weigh out 16 milligrams of penicillin G and 128 milligrams of gentamicin. Transfer each weighed dry antibiotic into 215 milliliter conical tubes. Add 10 milliliters of distilled water to each of the conical tubes and mix well by vortexing. Label the tubes with the antibiotic name and concentration.Performing the assay in triplicate, add 400 microliters of the working bacterial solution into the first wells of three rows of a 96-well microtiter plate. Next, add 200 microliters of the working bacterial solution in MHF broth to the wells of the three rows. Now, to generate a two-fold serial antibiotic dilution, first add four microliters of antibiotic stock to the first well, generating a 100 fold dilution. Sequentially, transfer 200 microliters of bacteria-antibiotic solution to each well, beginning from the first well through the second to last well in each row, ensure proper mixing by pipetting two to three times after every transfer. Discard the final 200 microliters of bacteria-antibiotic solution.To determine the results of the broth micro dilution test for penicillin G, first locate the wells that exhibit no visible bacterial growth, indicated by a lack of turbidity. From these wells, identify the well with the lowest antibiotic concentration. This represents the MIC value of penicillin G for the tested bacteria. The MIC value of gentamicin can be determined using the same assay and technique.To determine the results of the non-cross test, collect the first plate, which contains a penicillin G E strip. Then, determine the point where the growth inhibition zone intersects with the antibiotic strip. The corresponding value on the scale represents the MIC value for penicillin G in combination with gentamicin. In this example, the MIC value in combination is 0.064 micrograms per milliliter.Now, collect the second plate, which contains the gentamicin E strip, and determine the MIC value in combination as previously demonstrated. To evaluate the effect of combination, first calculate the fractional inhibitory concentration or FIC for penicillin G by dividing the MIC in combination by the MIC of the antibiotic alone. Repeat this process for gentamicin. Then, calculate the FIC index using the equation shown here. A two-fold reduction in the MIC value in combination yields an FIC index value that is less than or equal to 0.5 and demonstrates synergy between penicillin G and gentamicin. In this case, the calculated FIC value is 1.18 which is greater than 0.5. Thus, the results do not demonstrate synergy between penicillin G and gentamicin against the Streptococcus group G strain.To determine the results of the cross test, first determine the point where the growth inhibition zones intersect with their respective E strips. Read the numerical value on each E-test strip that corresponds to this intersection point. These values represent the MIC value in combination for penicillin G and gentamicin. Next, to evaluate the effect of the combination, calculate the FIC index using the equation shown here. In this example, the calculated FIC value is 1.18, which is greater than 0.5. This means that penicillin G and gentamicin do not act synergistically against the Streptococcus group G strain.

Education

JoVE Science Education

Advanced Biology

Microbiology

measuring bacterial resistance with e-tests

Measuring bacterial resistance with E-tests helps show how strongly an antibiotic can stop growth. The method is used to find the minimal inhibitory concentration, or MIC, which is the lowest antibiotic level that prevents visible bacterial growth. It is a practical way to study resistance in bacteria and compare how different antibiotics perform.

The E-test uses a plastic strip that contains a built-in antibiotic gradient. The strip is placed on an agar plate that has been inoculated with bacteria, and the MIC scale is printed directly on the strip in micrograms per milliliter. After incubation, an ellipse-shaped zone appears where growth is blocked. The MIC is read where that inhibition zone meets the strip.

A similar MIC method is microbroth dilution. In this approach, bacteria are placed in broth with different antibiotic concentrations. After incubation, the MIC is the lowest concentration that still stops visible growth. This method is quantitative and can be used with several bacteria, although it can require many reagents and careful preparation of the concentrations.

Knowing a bacterium’s resistance profile can help guide treatment choices. It can show whether a patient may benefit from one antibiotic or from a combination. When two antibiotics are used together, they may act in an additive, synergistic, or antagonistic way. Additive means the combined effect matches the effect of each drug at equal dose, while synergy means the combined effect is stronger than either drug alone.

E-tests can also be used to look for synergy and antagonism between antimicrobial agents. One method is non-cross testing. In this setup, one antibiotic strip is first placed on the agar plate, allowed to diffuse, and then removed. A second strip is placed in the same position, with the two MIC values aligned, and the result is used to calculate the fractional inhibitory concentration, or FIC. Values above 0.5 show synergy. This method is simple to read, but it takes more time and uses two plates.

A faster option is the cross test. Here, both E-test strips are placed at the same time in a 90-degree cross, with the known MIC values meeting at the angle. Only one plate is needed, so the method saves work, although the result can be a little harder to analyze. The changed inhibition zones are then used to determine whether the antibiotics act synergistically.

A broth-based approach can also be used for combination testing. It gives more flexibility because specific antibiotic concentrations can be chosen outside the limits of an E-test strip. It may also be more sensitive because the antibiotics are evenly distributed in liquid, rather than relying on diffusion through agar. In this method, wells in a 96-well plate are filled with a set number of bacteria and different antibiotic dilutions, and the MIC is the lowest concentration that prevents visible growth.

Measuring Bacterial Resistance with E-Tests

measuring-bacterial-resistance-with-e-tests

creating a winogradsky column: a method to enrich the microbial species in a sediment sample

creating-winogradsky-column-method-to-enrich-microbial-species

Winogradsky Column Microbial Layers and Gradients

A Winogradsky column shows how microbial layers form in mud and water over time. It is a clear, enclosed ecosystem that helps scientists grow sediment microbes that are hard to culture in a test tube or on a petri dish. By keeping conditions close to a microbe’s natural habitat, the column makes it possible to study organisms that help drive Earth’s biogeochemical cycles. The column is built from pond or wetland sediment mixed with water in a transparent container. Extra sources of carbon,...

serial dilutions and plating: microbial enumeration

serial-dilutions-and-plating-microbial-enumeration

Counting Bacteria with Dilution Plates

Counting bacteria with dilution plates helps microbiologists estimate how many cells are in a sample. Because bacteria can grow quickly and may be hard to count directly, serial dilution and plating make the concentration easier to measure. These methods have been used for more than a century to study bacterial and viral loads in clinical, industrial, pharmaceutical, and academic labs. Serial dilution reduces a sample in steps. A small volume of the original solution is moved into a fixed...

enrichment cultures: culturing aerobic and anaerobic microbes on selective and differential medias

enrichment-cultures-culturing-aerobic-anaerobic-microbes-on-selective

Selective Media for Bacterial Isolation

Selective media help scientists isolate bacteria by supporting some microbes and blocking others. This lab also uses differential media, which reveal a visible chemical trait in the organism being grown. Together, these methods help identify bacteria from mixed samples. Prokaryotic cells live in almost every environment on Earth. They also show wide metabolic diversity, so the growth medium must supply the molecules they need for energy. Some microbes are extremophiles, meaning they live in...

pure cultures and streak plating: isolation of single bacterial colonies from a mixed sample

pure-cultures-streak-plating-isolation-single-bacterial-colonies-from

Streak Plate Method for Isolating Bacteria

The streak plate method is used to isolate single bacterial colonies from a mixed sample. It helps separate one bacterial type from another so a pure culture can be grown. This is important in both clinical and research settings, where bacteria often grow together in mixed cultures. Pure cultures are needed for later genetic and protein studies. They are also used to check whether a sample is pure and to identify infectious agents from clinical samples. Because different strains can affect...

16s rrna sequencing: a pcr-based technique to identify bacterial species

16s-rrna-sequencing-pcr-based-technique-to-identify-bacterial

Bacterial ID with 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing

Bacterial identification with 16S rRNA gene sequencing helps scientists tell bacterial species apart. It is used in microbial ecology to study biodiversity in environmental samples and in medical microbiology to help diagnose infected patients. Traditional methods include microscopy, growth on specific media, biochemical and serological tests, and antibiotic sensitivity assays. Molecular methods have changed how bacteria are identified. 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing is often faster...

growth curves: generating growth curves using colony forming units and optical density measurements

growth-curves-generating-growth-curves-using-colony-forming-units

Bacterial Growth Stages and Cell Counts

Bacterial growth stages and cell counts show how a culture changes over time. This page follows a batch culture as it moves through lag, exponential, stationary, and death phases. It also shows how colony forming units, or CFU, and optical density can be used to measure that growth. Lag phase is the time bacteria need to adjust to a new environment before fast division begins. During exponential phase, cells grow and divide at the fastest rate, and DNA replication, RNA transcription, and...

Measuring bacterial resistance with E-tests helps show how strongly an antibiotic can stop growth. The method is used to find the minimal inhibitory concentration, or MIC, which is the lowest antibiotic level that prevents visible bacterial growth. It is a practical way to study resistance in bacteria and compare how different antibiotics perform. The E-test uses a plastic strip that contains a built-in antibiotic gradient. The strip is placed on an agar plate that has been inoculated with...

microscopy and staining: gram, capsule, and endospore staining

microscopy-and-staining-gram-capsule-and-endospore-staining

Bacterial Stains for Cell Walls and Spores

Bacterial stains help scientists see cell walls, capsules, and endospores with a compound light microscope. Many bacteria are hard to tell apart with light alone because they are small, colorless, and can look similar under the lens. Staining makes these hidden features visible and helps identify different bacteria. A compound microscope uses more than one lens to magnify a sample. Its objective lens collects light near the specimen, and the eyepiece enlarges the image. Many compound...

plaque assay: a method to determine viral titer as plaque forming units (pfu)

plaque-assay-method-to-determine-viral-titer-as-plaque-forming-units

Phage Plaque Test for Counting Viruses

Bacteriophages, or phages, are viruses that infect prokaryotic cells. The plaque assay is a classic way to count these viruses by measuring viral titer, which is the amount of virus in a sample. It was first described in 1952 and is still one of the most reliable methods for determining viral titer. Phages were identified in the early 20th century by Twort and d'Hérelle. They have since been recognized for their therapeutic value and for their role in human and global ecosystems. Interest in...

transformation of e. coli cells using an adapted calcium chloride procedure

transformation-e-coli-cells-using-an-adapted-calcium-chloride

Calcium Chloride DNA Uptake in E. coli

Calcium chloride treatment can help E. coli take up foreign DNA. This chemical transformation method is used in molecular biology to move a plasmid into bacterial cells and then identify the cells that received it. The protocol described here uses chemically competent E. coli DH5α cells and the plasmid pUC19 to measure transformation efficiency. Bacteria can exchange genetic material through horizontal gene transfer. The three main routes are transformation, transduction, and conjugation.

conjugation: a method to transfer ampicillin resistance from donor to recipient e. coli

conjugation-method-to-transfer-ampicillin-resistance-from-donor-to

Bacterial Gene Transfer by Conjugation in E. coli

Bacterial conjugation is a form of horizontal gene transfer in E. coli that moves DNA from one cell to another through direct contact. It was first discovered by Lederberg and Tatum in 1946. Unlike transformation or transduction, conjugation is a natural, one-way transfer of DNA from a donor cell to a recipient cell. This process can increase bacterial genetic diversity. It is often described as a type of bacterial mating. It has also helped drive the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria.

phage transduction: a method to transfer ampicillin resistance from donor to recipient e. coli

phage-transduction-method-to-transfer-ampicillin-resistance-from

Using P1 Phage to Move Antibiotic Resistance in E. coli

Bacteriophage transduction moves DNA between bacteria by using a phage, or bacterial virus, as the carrier. In this process, a phage can deliver genetic material from one bacterium to another. The method is a form of horizontal gene transfer and is important in both bacterial evolution and laboratory genetics. Phages were first described in the early 1900s, and transduction was named in 1951 by Norton Zinder and Joshua Lederberg. The transcript describes two main phage classes. Lytic phages...

microbiology

This collection demonstrates the key tools of microbiological investigation, including proper sterile technique and plating, how to use selective media and enrich samples, and culturing methods for mixed or pure samples. Additionally, it looks at common methods for identifying microbial isolates, as well as procedures for the genetic manipulation of bacteria.

Learn how E-tests and microbroth dilution measure MIC values, and how cross and non-cross setups reveal antibiotic synergy in bacteria.

Measuring Bacterial Resistance with E-Tests | JoVE K12

Georgia Standards of Excellence

9-12

Biology

SB6.e

Anna Bläckberg

Rolf Lood

Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Division of Infection Medicine, Biomedical Center

Lund University

Concepts

Preparation of Plates and Bacteria

Determining MIC Using E-Test

Synergy Testing: Cross Approach

Synergy Testing: Non-Cross Approach

MIC Determination Using Broth Dilution

Data Analysis: Broth Microdilution

Data Analysis and Results: Synergy Testing

Nucleic Acids and Nucleotides

Nucleic acids are the most important macromolecules for the continuity of life. They carry the cell&#39;s genetic blueprint and have instructions for its ...

Nucleic Acid Structure

The pentose sugar in DNA is deoxyribose, while in RNA the pentose sugar is ribose. The difference between the sugars is the presence of the hydroxyl group ...

DNA Base Pairing

Erwin Chargaff&#x2019;s rules on DNA equivalence paved the way for the discovery of base pairing in DNA. Chargaff&#x2019;s rules state that in a ...

From DNA to Protein

The flow of genetic information in cells from DNA to mRNA to protein is described by the central dogma, which states that genes specify the sequence of ...

The DNA Helix

Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is the genetic material responsible for passing traits from generation to generation in all organisms and most viruses. DNA ...

The Central Dogma

The central dogma explains the flow of genetic information from DNA nucleotides to the amino acid sequence of proteins.
RNA is the Missing Link Between ...

Genomic DNA in Prokaryotes

The genome of most prokaryotic organisms consists of double-stranded DNA organized into one circular chromosome in a region of cytoplasm called the ...

Genomic DNA in Eukaryotes

Eukaryotes have large genomes compared to prokaryotes. To fit their genomes into a cell, eukaryotic DNA is packaged extraordinarily tightly inside the ...

Overview

Deoxyribonucleic acid, or DNA, is the genetic material responsible for passing traits from generation to generation in all organisms and most ...

DNA Packaging

Overview

Eukaryotes have large genomes compared to prokaryotes. In order to fit their genomes into a cell, eukaryotes must pack their DNA tightly inside ...

RNA Structure

Overview
The basic structure of RNA consists of a five-carbon sugar and one of four nitrogenous bases. Although most RNA is single-stranded, it can form ...

RNA Stability

Intact DNA strands can be found in fossils, while scientists sometimes struggle to keep RNA intact under laboratory conditions. The structural variations ...

pre-mRNA Processing

In eukaryotic cells, transcripts made by RNA polymerase are modified and processed before exiting the nucleus. Unprocessed RNA is called precursor mRNA or ...

Types of RNA

Overview
Three main types of RNA are involved in protein synthesis: messenger RNA (mRNA), transfer RNA (tRNA), and ribosomal RNA (rRNA). These RNAs ...

DNA as a Genetic Template

What is Gene Expression?

A gene is a stretch of DNA that serves as the blueprint for functional RNAs and proteins. Since DNA is comprised&#160; of nucleotides and proteins are ...

Transcription

Transcription is the synthesis of RNA from a DNA sequence by RNA polymerase. It is the first step in producing a protein from a gene sequence. ...

Translation

Translation is the process of synthesizing proteins from the genetic information carried by messenger RNA (mRNA). Following transcription, it constitutes ...

Ribosomes

Ribosomes translate genetic information encoded by messenger RNA (mRNA) into proteins. Both prokaryotic and eukaryotic cells have ribosomes. Cells that ...

tRNA Activation

Initiation of Translation

Termination of Translation

What are Cells?

Cell Diversity

The concept of a cell started with microscopic observations of dead cork tissue by Robert Hooke in 1665. Hooke coined the term &#34;cell&#34; based on the ...

Cells of the Epidermis

The epidermis is made of four or five layers of epithelial cells, depending on its location in the body. From deep to superficial, these layers are the ...

Bone Cells and Tissue

Bones contain a relatively small number of cells entrenched in a matrix of organic and inorganic components. Although bone cells compose only a small ...

Gross Anatomy of Skeletal Muscles

The connective tissues play a significant role in arranging the muscle fibers into a hierarchical structure that forms a complete muscle. Consider a ...

Structure of Cardiac Muscles

Cardiac muscle, or myocardium, is a specialized type of muscle found exclusively in the heart. Its unique structural and functional characteristics enable ...

structure-and-organization-of-smooth-muscles

Structure and Organization of Smooth Muscles

In the human body, smooth muscle tissue is found lining the visceral and tubular organs such as the liver, lungs, blood vessels, and respiratory tract.
...

Chromosome Replication

Before a cell can divide, it must accurately replicate all of its chromosomes, including the DNA and its associated histone and non-histone ...

Neurons: The Cell Body and the Dendrites

A typical nerve cell comprises three main components: the cell body, dendrites, and the axon. The cell body, also known as the soma or perikaryon, serves ...

Lampbrush Chromosomes

In 1882, Flemming observed lampbrush chromosomes (LBC) in salamander eggs. Later in 1892, R&#252;ckert observed LBCs in shark egg cells and coined the ...

Neurons: The Axon

The axon is a long, thin extended portion of the neuron that carries impulses from its cell body toward the effector cell.
Axoplasm, the axon&#39;s ...

Polytene Chromosomes

Polytene chromosomes are giant interphase chromosomes with several DNA strands placed side by side. They were discovered in the year 1881 by Balbiani in ...

Nervous Tissue: Neuron Types

Neurons, the fundamental units of the nervous system, can be classified based on both their structural and functional characteristics.
Structurally, ...

Euchromatin

The extent of chromatin compaction can be studied by staining chromatin using specific DNA binding dyes. Under the microscope, the dense-compacted regions ...

Nervous Tissue: Glial Cells

Glial cells or neuroglia are non-neuronal cells in the nervous system that outnumber neurons. These include astrocytes, oligodendrocytes, microglia, and ...

Heterochromatin

Lymphoid Cells and Tissues

Lymphoid cells and lymphoid tissues are the two major components of lymphoid organs.
Lymphoid cells consist of immune system cells such as B and T ...

chromatin-position-affects-gene-expression

Chromatin Position Affects Gene Expression

Chromatin is the massive complex of DNA and proteins packaged inside the nucleus. The complexity of chromatin folding and how it is packaged inside the ...

Two structural features of the DNA molecule provide a basis for the mechanisms of heredity: the four nucleotide bases and its double-stranded nature. The ...

Organization of Genes

Chromosome Structure

A functional eukaryotic chromosome must contain three elements: a centromere, telomeres, and numerous origins of replication.
The centromere is a DNA ...

Construct an explanation based on evidence for how the structure of DNA determines the structure of proteins which carry out the essential functions of life through systems of specialized cells. Emphasis is on the conceptual understanding that DNA sequences determine the amino acid sequence and thus protein structure. Students can produce scientific writing, or presentations, and/or physical models that communicate constructed explanations.

HS-LS1-1

Characteristics of Life

Biology is a natural science that studies life and living organisms, including their structure, function, development, interactions, evolution, ...

https://cloudfront.jove.com/files/media/science-education/science-education-thumbs/10647.jpg

Levels of Organization

Biological organization is the classification of biological structures, ranging from atoms at the bottom of the hierarchy to the Earth&#x27;s biosphere. ...

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves ...

Taxonomy

Taxonomy is the science of defining and naming groups of biological organisms based on shared characteristics. It uses a hierarchy of increasingly ...

Phylogeny

Phylogeny is concerned with the evolutionary diversification of organisms or groups of organisms. A group of organisms with a name is called a taxon ...

Develop and use a model to illustrate the hierarchical organization of interacting systems that provide specific functions within multicellular organisms. Emphasis is on functions at the organism system level such as nutrient uptake, water delivery, or organism movement in response to neural stimuli. An example of an interacting system could be an artery depending on the proper function of elastic tissue and smooth muscle to regulate and deliver the proper amount of blood within the circulatory system.

HS-LS1-2

Overview of Metabolism

Living cells constantly carry out various chemical reactions which are necessary for their proper functioning. These reactions are interlinked to one ...

Regulation of Metabolism

Cellular needs and conditions vary from cell to cell and change within individual cells over time. For example, the required enzymes and energetic demands ...

Positive and Negative Feedback Loops

Animal organs and organ systems constantly adjust to internal and external changes through a process called homeostasis (&#34;steady state&#34;). Examples ...

Functions of Life

Human life is characterized by a variety of functions that are essential for survival and well-being. These functions include metabolism, movement, ...

Requirements for Human Life

The Earth and its atmosphere have provided humans with air, water, and food, but these are not the only requirements for survival. Humans also require a ...

What is Homeostasis?

Maintaining homeostasis requires that the body continuously maintain its internal conditions. Each physiological condition has a particular set point, ...

Negative and Positive Feedback

Homeostatic Imbalance

Homeostasis is the maintenance of a stable internal environment within the body, which is crucial for the proper functioning of cells, tissues, organs, ...

pH Homeostasis

Acid-base homeostasis is essential for maintaining normal physiological activities in humans. The pH of various body fluids is strictly regulated because ...

homeostatic-imbalances-in-body-temperature

Homeostatic Imbalances in Body Temperature

Hyperthermia is an umbrella term for elevated body temperature that occurs when heat production exceeds the body&#39;s ability to dissipate it.
...

Plan and conduct an investigation to provide evidence that feedback mechanisms maintain homeostasis in living organisms. Examples of investigations could include heart rate responses to exercise, stomate responses to moisture and temperature, root development in response to water levels, or cell response to hypertonic and hypotonic environments.

HS-LS1-3

Measuring Bacterial Resistance with E-Tests

Description

Transcript

Tags

More videos by Standards