Name: scientific method steps and controls
Uploaded: 2019-01-29T11:04:44.000Z
Duration: 7 min 23 s
Channel: JoVE

K12 Standards

Virginia  Standards of Learning

HIgh School

Earth Science

ES.1

ES.1.a

Scientific Method

The scientific method is a framework of techniques and questions that scientists use to investigate phenomena with the aim of making scientific discoveries simple and reproducible. It&#39;s been loosely observed by experimenters going as far back as the 4th century BC, but the first properly formalized scientific method was coined during the European Renaissance. Here individuals at the forefront of science like Francis Bacon, Galileo, and Isaac Newton started putting into routine practice the rules that we use to carry out experiments today. 
Typically, the first step of the scientific method is to formulate a question, usually after observation of a phenomenon. For example, say you have been raising caterpillars and have noticed that some take longer than others to get to pupation. And you wonder, do the caterpillars develop at different rates depending on the temperature? 
This is where the second part of the scientific method comes in, the hypothesis. A hypothesis is an uncertain explanation as to why we observe what we observe, and there are two main types. The first is the experimental or alternative hypothesis, and it implies that there will be a relationship between the variables being investigated, the temperature and caterpillar development, in this case. So, our experimental hypothesis could be that the caterpillars will take longer to go from egg to pupation if they&#39;re raised at colder temperatures. Crucially, a good hypothesis will be testable. For our caterpillars, we can change the temperature, and record the time it takes for them to go from egg to pupa, and falsifiable. So, if it takes around the same time for the caterpillars to develop no matter what the temperature, then we can accept that the hypothesis was likely false. The second type of hypothesis is the null hypothesis. This typically speculates that there won&#39;t be any observed significant change or difference during the experiment. In our caterpillar example, we would state that the caterpillars will develop at the same rate in each temperature condition. 
Once we have our hypotheses, the third step of the scientific method covers experimentation and data collection. In a typical experiment, there will be two types of variables. The independent variable is something directly manipulated by the experimenter. So, with our caterpillars, we are altering the independent variable when we change the temperature. The dependent variable, also known as the response variable, should be affected by the state of the independent variable. So, when we expose our caterpillars to different temperatures, then the response, the dependent variable, is the rate at which they develop. 
There are also two main types of data that could be collected to support or falsify the hypotheses. The first is qualitative data, which typically refers to descriptive observations made with the senses, seeing, touching, hearing, smelling, or even tasting. In our experiment, we might record that the caterpillars seem to move around and eat a lot in the normal temperature condition, compared to the cooler one. In contrast to qualitative data, quantitative data can be measured and written down as numbers. So, when we count the number of hours it takes the caterpillar from hatching to finally pupating, this gives us a definite figure. Where possible, it&#39;s almost important to have a control condition in any experiment where we manipulate the independent variables. In our caterpillar experiment, we can grow the caterpillars at a set standard room temperature of 21 degrees as a control, because this demonstrates what happens when the caterpillars develop under normal conditions in comparison to experimental settings. 
In observational experiments, a control may not be needed or even possible. For example, imagine our caterpillars are now grown up butterflies, feeding on nectar in a flower garden. In our experimental hypothesis, we suggest that they prefer to feed from the big pink flowers, while our null hypothesis suggests they have no preference and will visit the flowers at random. In this case, simply observing and recording the number of times the butterflies visit each flower type will provide enough data to confirm or reject our hypotheses without needing manipulation of any variables or the need for a control. 
Once the data have been collected, the next step is to figure out what it all means. Scientists will compare the predictions of their two hypotheses to figure out if they can reject the null hypothesis. This can be done by comparing the values of the dependent variable in the control versus the experimental conditions. If they are not equal, the null hypothesis can be rejected. If the data collected supports a hypothesis, like the caterpillars did take significantly more hours to go from egg to pupa when kept at the cooler climate, then this gives the experimental hypothesis more credibility, but critically it does not indicate that the hypothesis is definitely true, because future experiments may reveal new information. 
The final part of the scientific method is where we draw conclusions, and discuss what our findings might mean. Here, scientists might refer to other experiments or other literature to put their findings into context, and come up with explanations of why the results showed what they did. For example, the conclusion could be that the caterpillars like to grow at temperatures closest to their natural habitat. This may, in turn, spiral new questions, like do other species pupate at different rates at different temperatures, too? This may inspire new experiments, which we can test using, you guessed it, the scientific method.

scientific method

The scientific method is used to solve problems and explain phenomena. The development of the scientific method coincided with changes in philosophy underpinning scientific discovery, radically transforming the views of society about nature. During the European Renaissance, individuals such as Francis Bacon, Galileo, and Isaac Newton formalized the concept of the scientific method and put it into practice. Although the scientific method has been revised since its early conceptions, much of the framework and philosophy remains in practice today.
<h4>Step 1: The Observation and Question</h4>
Prior to investigation, a scientist must define the question to be addressed. This crucial first step in the scientific process involves observing some natural phenomena of interest. This observation should then lead to a number of questions about the phenomena. This stage frequently requires background research necessary to understand the subject matter and past work on similar ideas. Reviewing and evaluating previous research allows scientists to refine their questions to more accurately address gaps in scientific knowledge. Defining a research question and understanding relevant prior research will influence how the scientific method is applied, making it an important first step in the research process.
An everyday example: You are trying to get to school or work and your car won&#8217;t start. The thought process that most people go through in that situation clearly mirrors the official scientific method (after you are finished getting upset). First, you make an observation: my car won&#8217;t start! The question that follows: why isn&#8217;t it working?
<h4>Step 2: The Hypothesis</h4>
The next step is making a hypothesis, based on prior knowledge. A hypothesis is an &#8220;uncertain explanation&#8221; or an unproven conjecture that seeks to explain some phenomenon based on knowledge obtained while executing subsequent experiments or observations. Generally, scientists develop multiple hypotheses to address their questions and test them systematically.
All hypotheses must meet certain criteria for the scientific process to work. First, a hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable. This aspect of the hypothesis is critical and of much greater importance than the hypothesis being correct. A testable hypothesis is one that generates testable predictions, addressed through observations or experiments. A falsifiable hypothesis is one that, through observation of conflicting outcomes, can be proven wrong. This allows investigators to gain more confidence over time, not by accumulating evidence showing that a hypothesis is correct, but rather by showing that situations that could establish its falsity do not occur.
Hypotheses come in two forms: null hypotheses and alternative hypotheses. The null hypothesis is tested against the alternative hypothesis and reflects that there will be no observed change in the experiment. The alternative hypothesis is generally the one described in the previous two paragraphs, also referred to as the experimental hypothesis. The alternative hypothesis is the predicted outcome of the experiment. If the null hypothesis is rejected, then this builds evidence for the alternative hypothesis.
An everyday example: Maybe it is freezing outside and therefore it is fairly likely that your car battery is dead. Maybe you know you were low on gas the night before and therefore it is likely that the tank is empty.
<h4>Step 3: Experimentation and Data Collection</h4>
Either way, the next step is to make more observations or to conduct experiments leading to conclusions. Following the formulation of hypotheses, scientists plan and conduct experiments to test their hypotheses. These experiments provide data that will either support or falsify the hypothesis. Data can be collected from quantitative or qualitative observations. Qualitative information refers to observations that can be made simply using one&#39;s senses, be that through sight, sound, taste, smell, or touch. In contrast, quantitative observations are ones in which precise measurements of some type are used to investigate one&#39;s hypothesis.
An experiment is a procedure designed to determine whether observations of the real world agree with or refute the derived predictions in the hypothesis. If evidence from an experiment supports a hypothesis, that gives the hypothesis more credibility. This does not indicate that the hypothesis is true, as future experiments may reveal new information about the original hypothesis. Experimental design is another critical step in the scientific method and can have a great effect on the results and conclusions one draws from an experiment. Careful thought and time should be devoted to experimental design and minimizing possible errors. The experiment should be designed so that every variable or factor that could influence the outcome of the experiment be under control of the researcher. Two types of variables are used to describe the conditions in an experiment: the independent and the dependent, or response, variable. The independent variable is directly manipulated or controlled by the scientist and is generally what one predicts will affect the dependent variable. The dependent, or response, variable thus depends on the value of the independent variable. Experiments are generally designed so that one specific factor is manipulated in the experiment in order to illuminate cause and effect relationships.
An everyday example: Does the car still have all of its parts? Is this the right key? What does the gas gauge say? Does a jump start help?
Another important aspect in experimental design is the role of the control treatment, which represents a non-manipulated treatment condition. The control treatment is kept in the same conditions as the experimental treatment, but the experimental manipulation is not applied to the control. For example, if a researcher were testing the effects of soil salinity on plant growth, the soil in the control treatment would have no added salt. The control provides a baseline of &#8220;normal&#8221; conditions with which to compare the experimental treatments.
Experimental design should also incorporate replicates of each treatment. Repeatability of experimental results is an important part of the scientific method that ensures the validity and accuracy of data. It is quite difficult to control all aspects of an experiment so there is inherent variation in results that cannot be controlled for even under the most carefully designed and controlled experiments. Having replicates enables an investigator to estimate this inherent variation in results. Precise recording and measurement of data is also of great importance for ensuring the accuracy of results and the conclusions one draws from the results.
<h4>Step 4: Results and Data Analysis</h4>
The next step in the scientific method involves determining what the results from the experiment mean. Scientists compare the predictions of their null hypothesis to that of their alternative hypothesis to determine if they are able to reject the null hypothesis. Rejecting the null hypothesis means that there is a significant probability that values of the dependent variable in the control versus experimental treatments are not equal to each other. If significant differences exist, then one can reject the null hypothesis and accept the alternative hypothesis. Conversely, the investigator may fail to reject the null hypothesis, meaning the treatment has no effect on the results. Before scientists can make any claims about their null hypothesis from their experimental data or observations, statistical tests are required to ensure the validity of the data and further interpretation of the data. Statistical tests allow researchers to determine if there are genuine differences between the control and experimental treatments. From there, they can create figures and tables to illustrate their findings.
<h4>Step 5: Conclusions</h4>
The last portion of the scientific method involves providing explanations of the results and the conclusions that can be logically drawn from the results. Generally, this step of the scientific process also requires one to revisit scientific literature and compare their results with other experiments or observations on related topics. This allows researchers to put their experiment in a more general context and elaborate on the significance of particular results. Additionally, it allows them to explain how their work fits into a larger context in their discipline.
The scientific process does not stop here! The scientific process works through time as knowledge on topics in science accumulate and drive our understanding of particular mechanisms or processes explaining natural phenomena. If we fail to reject our null hypothesis, then it becomes necessary to revisit the initial stages of the scientific method and try to reformulate our questions and understand why an anticipated result was not attained.
<h4>Application of the Scientific Method</h4>
The only difference between the use of this method in every-day life and in the laboratory is that scientists carefully document their work, from observation to hypothesis to experiment, and finally conclusions and peer review. In addition, unlike problem solving outside the lab, the scientific method in the lab includes controlled conditions and variables.
Let&#8217;s investigate the scientific method using an example from the lab. It is known that plant growth is affected by microbes, such as bacteria and fungi, living in their soil. It is possible to figure out what microbes have which effects by potting plants in completely sterile soil, then adding in microbes one at a time, or in different combinations and measuring the growth of the plant. Now let&#8217;s fit this into the terms used to describe the scientific method:
Observation and Question: There are microbes in the soil&#8230;do these affect plant growth?
HYPOTHESES:
Experimental: One particular microbe of interest will cause the plants to grow more slowly.
Null: The presence or absence of microbes will have no effect on plant growth
Experiment: set up groups of plants in 1) sterile soil, 2) soil with the microbe added in, and 3) natural soil. Measure the growth of the plants over time, using a ruler.
Conclusion: if the plants in group 2 grow more slowly than the other two, the hypothesis is supported. This needs to be backed up with statistical analysis from many plants to be considered significant. An experiment like this is not legitimate with just one plant per group.
Group 1 is a control which shows the plants can grow in the sterile soil. Group 3 is a control that shows the plants can grow under normal conditions. Group 2 is the experimental group. It would be possible to add different amounts of the microbe, or different microbes, to introduce more variables. The main point is that the researcher has something to which to compare the experimental group- the control group. If the experiment included only group 2 and the researcher determined that the plants &#8220;looked sick,&#8221; that would be a matter of opinion. The only way to make that observation scientific is to have healthy plants to measure. The type or amount of microbe used is the independent variable, because the researcher has control over it. The size of the plant at the end of the experiment is the dependent or response variable because it is the result.
Ultimately, work like this is published in scientific journals so that other researchers can read about the methods used and conclusions drawn. Publications like this are subject to peer-review, which means that an article won&#8217;t be published in a journal until other researchers have checked it out and agree it is well-done. As a community of scientists, general concepts are developed based on observed patterns in the experiments that individual scientists conduct. This results in the development of a scientific theory. This term means that there is a consensus among researchers that a particular concept or process exists. It is important to note that the word theory does not mean the same thing as hypothesis. Once scientists label a concept with this term, it is considered to be true, considering all currently available data. Of course, if a large body of experimentation demonstrates information to the contrary, theories can be modified.

The scientific method is used to solve problems and explain phenomena. The development of the scientific method coincided with changes in philosophy ...

Education

JoVE Lab Manual

Biology

Fundamentals

scientific method steps and controls

The scientific method gives scientists a way to solve problems and explain natural events. Its development grew alongside new ideas in science during the European Renaissance. Thinkers such as Francis Bacon, Galileo, and Isaac Newton helped formalize the process. Although the method has changed over time, much of its basic framework is still used today.

The process begins with observation and a clear question. A scientist first notices a natural phenomenon and then asks why it happens. This stage often includes background research. Reading earlier studies helps refine the question and identify gaps in scientific knowledge. In everyday life, this can look like noticing that a car will not start and asking why it is not working.

Next comes the hypothesis. A hypothesis is an unproven explanation based on prior knowledge. Scientists often develop more than one hypothesis and test them in a systematic way. A good hypothesis must be testable and falsifiable, which means it can produce predictions and can also be shown wrong. Hypotheses are often written as a null hypothesis, which predicts no change, and an alternative hypothesis, which predicts the expected outcome. If the null hypothesis is rejected, that supports the alternative hypothesis.

After that, scientists collect data through experiments or more observations. Experiments are designed to test the predictions made by a hypothesis. Data may be qualitative, based on the senses, or quantitative, based on measurements. Careful experimental design is important because it helps reduce error and control factors that could affect the outcome. The independent variable is the factor the scientist changes, and the dependent, or response, variable is the result that is measured.

Controls and replicates are also essential. A control treatment is a condition that is not manipulated, but it is kept under the same conditions as the experimental treatment. It provides a baseline for comparison. Replicates, or repeated trials, help scientists estimate natural variation in the data and check that results can be repeated. Precise recording and measurement make the results more reliable.

Scientists then analyze the results to see what the data mean. They compare the null hypothesis with the alternative hypothesis and use statistical tests before making claims. Statistics help show whether differences between control and experimental treatments are real. Results are often displayed in figures and tables so they can be reviewed and understood more easily.

The final step is drawing conclusions. Scientists explain what the results mean and compare them with earlier research on related topics. This places the work in a wider scientific context and shows how it fits into the field. The scientific process does not end there. If the null hypothesis is not rejected, scientists return to the earlier steps and revise the question or hypothesis.

In lab work, the scientific method is carefully documented from start to finish. It also includes controlled conditions and variables. A plant-microbe experiment shows how this works. Researchers can grow plants in sterile soil, add one microbe at a time, or use natural soil, then measure plant growth with a ruler. In this example, the question is whether microbes affect plant growth. The experimental hypothesis is that one microbe will slow growth, and the null hypothesis is that microbes will have no effect.

The setup includes a control group and an experimental group. One group shows that plants can grow in sterile soil, and another shows that plants can grow in natural soil. The group with the added microbe is the experimental group. The type or amount of microbe is the independent variable, and plant size at the end is the dependent variable. A claim based on only one plant per group would not be valid. The results must be supported by statistical analysis from many plants.

Work like this is published in scientific journals so other researchers can read the methods and conclusions. These publications are checked through peer review before they are accepted. Over time, patterns from many experiments help scientists build broader ideas about how nature works. This is how scientific theory develops. In science, theory means a concept supported by a strong body of evidence, not a guess.

Scientific Method Steps and Controls

The scientific method gives scientists a way to solve problems and explain natural events. Its development grew alongside new ideas in science during the European Renaissance. Thinkers such as Francis Bacon, Galileo, and Isaac Newton helped formalize the process. Although the method has changed over time, much of its basic framework is still used today. The process begins with observation and a clear question. A scientist first notices a natural phenomenon and then asks why it happens. This...

diffusion and osmosis

Cell Membrane Transport and Water Balance

Cell membrane transport and water balance help cells move materials in and out of the cytoplasm. Cell membranes are semipermeable, which means some molecules can pass through while others cannot. The phospholipid bilayer and its embedded proteins control this movement. Some of these proteins act as transport channels for ions and carbohydrates that could not cross on their own. Cells stay small in part because of the surface-area to volume ratio. As a cell grows, its surface area does not keep...

cell structure

Cell Types and Organelles

Cells are the basic units of life, and their structures help explain how living things work. Cell theory says that every living organism is made of one or more cells, cells are the functional units of organisms, and new cells come from preexisting cells. Cells also share key features, including a plasma membrane, cytoplasm, DNA, and ribosomes. The plasma membrane is a phospholipid bilayer that surrounds the cell. It separates the cell from its environment and controls what enters and leaves.

macromolecules

Biomolecules and Their Tests

Biomolecules are the organic molecules that living things use for structure, energy, and heredity. They all have a carbon backbone and hydrogen atoms, and carbon can form four covalent bonds. That bonding flexibility lets carbon build chains, branches, rings, and other complex shapes. Biomolecules also commonly include oxygen, nitrogen, phosphorus, and sulfur. Small building blocks join together to make larger molecules. These units are called monomers. Two monomers can form a dimer through...

physiology of the circulatory system

Circulatory System: Blood Flow and Pressure

The circulatory system moves blood, oxygen, nutrients, and wastes through the body to support homeostasis. Homeostasis is the stable internal balance that organisms must maintain even when the outside environment changes. Physiology is the study of how body systems work, and the circulatory system is one of the key systems that helps keep internal conditions steady. Body systems are built from cells, tissues, organs, and organ systems. Humans have 11 major organ systems, and they work together...

fundamentals

Learn the scientific method through observation, hypotheses, experiments, controls, variables, data analysis, conclusions, and a plant-microbe example.

Scientific Method Steps and Controls | JoVE K12

ES.1.b

ES.1.f

Life Science

LS.1

LS.1.a

LS.1.b

LS.1.f

Physical Science

PS.1

PS.1.a

PS.1.d

Physics

PH.1

PH.1.a

PH.1.d

Texas Essential Knowledge and Skills

High School

Specialised Topic in Science

112.51.c.1.

112.51.c.1.B.

Florida Department of Education

Nature of Science

SC.912.N.1

SC.912.N.1.1

SC.912.N.1.2

SC.912.N.2

SC.912.N.2.1

BIO.1

BIO.1.B

BIO.4

BIO.4.B

BIO.4.C

Use labeled branches from five local tree species to practice the scientific method through observation, comparison, and discussion of plant traits.

Tree Branch Sort for the Scientific Method | JoVE K12

Compare leaf mass, length, and surface area as students apply the scientific method through observation, hypothesis writing, data collection, and graphing.

Measuring Leaf Traits in the Scientific Method | JoVE K12

Scientific Laws and Theories

Scientific Laws

In science, a law is defined as a concise, verbal or mathematical, statement that summarizes a vast number of experimental observations. ...

The Scientific Method

The scientific method is a detailed, empirical problem-solving process used by biologists and other scientists. This iterative approach involves ...

Chemistry is an empirical science. Scientists often pose questions to understand the chemistry in everyday life and seek answers to these questions. To ...

What is a Hypothesis?

A hypothesis can be a simple sentence or statement about a property or any phenomenon observed or predicted for a population. It is usually a claim about ...

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed ...

Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?

The outcome of any hypothesis testing leads to rejecting or not rejecting the null hypothesis. This decision is taken based on the analysis of the data, ...

The student will demonstrate an understanding of scientific and engineering practices by asking questions and defining problems
• ask questions that arise from careful observation of phenomena, examination of a model or theory, or unexpected results, and/or to seek additional information
• determine which questions can be investigated within the scope of the school laboratory or field experience
• generate hypotheses based on research and scientific principles
• make hypotheses that specify what happens to a dependent variable when an independent variable is manipulated
• define design problems that involve the development of a process or system with multiple components and criteria

Inductive Reasoning

Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in ...

Deductive Reasoning

Deductive reasoning, or deduction, is the type of logic used in hypothesis-based science. In deductive reasoning, the pattern of thinking moves in the ...

Correlation and Causation

Correlation and CausationStatistical tests can calculate whether there is a relationship, or correlation, between independent and dependent variables. A ...

Demonstrating the Scientific Method with Tree Branches
ExpandObtain branches containing a few dozen typical leaves from five different local tree species. ...

Observation and Background Research
ExpandNOTE: The first two steps in the scientific process involve studying and observing natural phenomena of ...

The student will demonstrate an understanding of scientific and engineering practices by planning and carrying out investigations
• individually and collaboratively plan and conduct observational and experimental investigations
• plan and conduct investigations to test design solutions in a safe and ethical manner including considerations of environmental, social and personal effects
• select and use appropriate tools and technology to collect, record, analyze, and evaluate data

Introduction to Test of Independence

In statistics, the term independence means that one can directly obtain the probability of any event involving both variables by multiplying their ...

Statistical Analysis: Overview

An analysis is usually conducted by replicated sampling or repeated measurements on the same sample. This leads to scattered results rather than a single ...

Statistical Significance

Once data is collected from both the experimental and the control groups, a statistical analysis is conducted to find out if there are meaningful ...

Review and Preview

Data are individual items of information obtained from a population or sample. Data may be classified as qualitative (categorical), quantitative ...

Data: Types and Distribution

In biostatistics, data refers to the collected observations that are subject to analysis. Data can be parametric or nonparametric.
Nonparametric data ...

Histogram

The histogram is a graphical representation in the x-y form of data distribution in a data set. The horizontal x-axis is labeled with what the data ...

Scatter Plot

The most common and easiest way to display the relationship between two variables, x and y, is a scatter plot. A scatter plot shows the direction of a ...

Bar Graph

A bar graph is also called a bar chart and consists of bars that are separated from each other. It either uses horizontal or vertical bars to show ...

Pie Chart

A pie chart (or a pie graph) is a circular graphical chart or a pictorial representation of categorical data. It is divided into slices of pie each ...

Numerical Calculations

In engineering applications, the representation of the numerical value is critical. Presenting or reporting the answer is one of the essential parts of ...

Accuracy and Precision

Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy ...

Significant Figures in Calculations

Uncertainty in measurements can be avoided by reporting the results of a calculation with the correct number of significant figures. This can be ...

Realism in Experimentation

Source: Laboratories of Gary Lewandowski, Dave Strohmetz, and Natalie Ciarocco&#8212;Monmouth University

In an ideal world researchers would conduct ...

The student will demonstrate an understanding of scientific and engineering practices by pnterpreting, analyzing, and evaluating data
• construct and interpret data tables showing independent and dependent variables, repeated trials, and means
• construct, analyze, and interpret graphical displays of data and consider limitations of data analysis
• apply mathematical concepts and processes to scientific questions
• use data in building and revising models, supporting explanations of phenomena, or testing solutions to problems
• analyze data using tools, technologies, and/or models in order to make valid and reliable scientific claims or determine an optimal design solution

ES.1.c

Data Collection by Observations

Data collection refers to a systematic way of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. Observational studies are one of the ...

Data Collection by Experiments

Data collection is a systematic method of obtaining, observing, measuring, and analyzing accurate information. An experimental study is a standard method ...

Data Collection by Survey

The systematic method of obtaining and analyzing accurate information of a population is called data collection. A survey is a standard method of data ...

Reliability and Validity

Reliability and validity are two important considerations that must be made with any type of data collection. Reliability refers to the ability to ...

Reasoning

Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Reasoning ...

The student will demonstrate an understanding of scientific and engineering practices by constructing and critiquing conclusions and explanations
• make quantitative and/or qualitative claims based on data
• construct and revise explanations based on valid and reliable evidence obtained from a variety of sources, including students' own investigations, models, theories, simulations, and peer review
• apply scientific ideas, principles, and/or evidence to provide an explanation of phenomena or design solutions
• construct arguments or counterarguments based on data and evidence
• differentiate between a scientific hypothesis, theory, and law

ES.1.d

using-topographic-maps-to-generate-topographic-profiles

Using Topographic Maps to Generate Topographic Profiles

Source: Laboratory of Alan Lester - University of Colorado Boulder
Topographic maps are &#34;plan-view&#34; representations of Earth&#39;s ...

The student will demonstrate an understanding of scientific and engineering practices by developing and using models
• evaluate the merits and limitations of models
• develop, revise, and/or use models based on evidence to illustrate or predict relationships
• construct and interpret scales, diagrams, classification charts, graphs, tables, imagery, models, including geologic cross sections and topographic profiles
• read and interpret topographic and basic geologic maps and globes, including location by latitude and longitude

ES.1.e

Data Source

A data source is the origin of collected data, whether physical or digital, and includes all channels, platforms, and repositories for gathering and ...

Communication

Sharing information, concepts, and emotions to foster mutual understanding is communication. The sender, recipient, and transaction must be considered in ...

levels-of-communication-i-intrapersonal-interpersonal-and-small-group

Levels of Communication I: Intrapersonal, Interpersonal, and Small Group

Interpersonal communication focuses on the exchange of messages between two people.
We can participate in these relationships through verbal, nonverbal, ...

levels-of-communication-ii-organizational-public-and-group-dynamics

Levels of Communication II: Organizational, Public, and Group Dynamics

Effective communication is the foundation of a good organization. Communication is the lifeblood of an organization that connects the group with messages. ...

The student will demonstrate an understanding of scientific and engineering practices by obtaining, evaluating, and communicating information
• compare, integrate, and evaluate sources of information presented in different media or formats to address a scientific question or solve a problem
• gather, read, and evaluate scientific and/or technical information from multiple sources, assessing the evidence and credibility of each source
• communicate scientific and/or technical information about phenomena and/or a design process in multiple formats

Scientific Method Steps and Controls

Description

Transcript

Tags

More videos by Standards