Oligonucleotides can be used to site specifically substitute a single nucleotide of transfected target genes in both Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi cells.
Method Article
Oligonucleotides can be used to site specifically substitute a single nucleotide of transfected target genes in both Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi cells.
Plasmodium parasites, the causative agent of malaria, are transmitted through the bites of infected Anopheles mosquitoes resulting in over 250 million new infections each year. Despite decades of research, there is still no vaccine against malaria, highlighting the need for novel control strategies. One innovative approach is the use of genetically modified mosquitoes to effectively control malaria parasite transmission. Deliberate alterations of cell signaling pathways in the mosquito, via targeted mutagenesis, have been found to regulate parasite development 1. From these studies, we can begin to identify potential gene targets for transformation. Targeted mutagenesis has traditionally relied upon the homologous recombination between a target gene and a large DNA molecule. However, the construction and use of such complex DNA molecules for generation of stably transformed cell lines is costly, time consuming and often inefficient. Therefore, a strategy using locked nucleic acid-modified oligonucleotides (LNA-ONs) provides a useful alternative for introducing artificial single nucleotide substitutions into episomal and chromosomal DNA gene targets (reviewed in 2). LNA-ON-mediated targeted mutagenesis has been used to introduce point mutations into genes of interest in cultured cells of both yeast and mice 3,4. We show here that LNA-ONs can be used to introduce a single nucleotide change in a transfected episomal target that results in a switch from blue fluorescent protein (BFP) expression to green fluorescent protein (GFP) expression in both Anopheles gambiae and Anopheles stephensi cells. This conversion demonstrates for the first time that effective mutagenesis of target genes in mosquito cells can be mediated by LNA-ONs and suggests that this technique may be applicable to mutagenesis of chromosomal targets in vitro and in vivo.
Representative Results

Figure 1. Untransfected healthy A. stephensi MSQ43 (A) and A. gambiae SUA5B (B) cells at approximately 80% confluence.

Figure 2. A. stephensi MSQ43 (A) and A. gambiae SUA5B (B) cells transfected with positive control GFP expressing plasmid.

Figure 3. Flow cytometry data confirming conversion of BFP to GFP via mutagenesis of a single nucleotide following transfection with BFP-specific locked nucleic acid-modified oligonucleotides (LNA-ONs). SUA5B cells were transfected with a GFP expressing plasmid (pGFP) as positive control, with a BFP expressing plasmid (pBFP) as a negative control, or with pBFP and increasing concentrations of BFP-specific LNA-ONs. (A) Gating strategy for flow cytometry data showing from left to right: forward versus side scatter of live cells, propidium iodide (PI) negative cells, and GFP positive cells five days following transfection. (B) Graph of percentage of GFP positive cells shown in (A) following transfection with pBFP and increasing concentrations of LNA-ONs.

Table I. Transfection conditions.

Table II. Transfection conditions used in Figure 1.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Here we present an in vitro method and evidence for targeted conversion of a single nucleotide in an episomal gene target following transfection of LNA-ONs into A. stephensi and A. gambiae cells. LNA-ON-mediated gene conversion requires induction of a site-specific DNA repair response; our data indicate that mosquito cells can support this mechanism for site-specific mutagenesis. While the method presented here is based on conversion of an episomal target, our data suggest that LNA-ON-mediated ...
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
No conflicts of interest declared.
We would like to thank Abbie Spinner at the California National Primate Research Center for her assistance with flow cytometry. This study was supported by funding from the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID) National Institutes of Health (NIH) AI073745, AI080799, and AI078183.
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| Effectene transfection reagent | Qiagen | 301425 | |
| GFP control plasmid (pcDNA6.2-GW/EmGFP-miR-neg) | Invitrogen | K4935-00 | |
| BFP plasmid (pcDNA5/FRT/TO) | Gift from Dr. Concordet3 | ||
| LNA-ONs | Gift from Dr. Concordet3 | ||
| MEM, Earle’s w/ glutamine | Invitrogen | 11095 | |
| Fetal calf serum (FCS) | Invitrogen | 16000 | |
| Schneider’s Drosophila medium | Invitrogen | 11730 | |
| Non-essential amino acids | Invitrogen | 11140 | |
| 10% D-glucose | Sigma-Aldrich | G5767 | |
| Penicillin-streptomycin antibiotic | Invitrogen | 15140 | |
| 6-well culture plates | Corning | 3516 |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article
Request Permission