A technique is described to quantify the in vivo physiological response of mammalian neurons during movement and correlate the physiology of the neuron with neuronal morphology, neurochemical phenotype and synaptic microcircuitry.
A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.
Method Article
A technique is described to quantify the in vivo physiological response of mammalian neurons during movement and correlate the physiology of the neuron with neuronal morphology, neurochemical phenotype and synaptic microcircuitry.
The role of individual neurons and their function in neuronal circuits is fundamental to understanding the neuronal mechanisms of sensory and motor functions. Most investigations of sensorimotor mechanisms rely on either examination of neurons while an animal is static1,2 or record extracellular neuronal activity during a movement.3,4 While these studies have provided the fundamental background for sensorimotor function, they either do not evaluate functional information which occurs during a movement or are limited in their ability to fully characterize the anatomy, physiology and neurochemical phenotype of the neuron. A technique is shown here which allows extensive characterization of individual neurons during an in vivo movement. This technique can be used not only to study primary afferent neurons but also to characterize motoneurons and sensorimotor interneurons. Initially the response of a single neuron is recorded using electrophysiological methods during various movements of the mandible followed by determination of the receptive field for the neuron. A neuronal tracer is then intracellularly injected into the neuron and the brain is processed so that the neuron can be visualized with light, electron or confocal microscopy (Fig. 1). The detailed morphology of the characterized neuron is then reconstructed so that neuronal morphology can be correlated with the physiological response of the neuron (Figs. 2,3). In this communication important key details and tips for successful implementation of this technique are provided. Valuable additional information can be determined for the neuron under study by combining this method with other techniques. Retrograde neuronal labeling can be used to determine neurons with which the labeled neuron synapses; thus allowing detailed determination of neuronal circuitry. Immunocytochemistry can be combined with this method to examine neurotransmitters within the labeled neuron and to determine the chemical phenotypes of neurons with which the labeled neuron synapses. The labeled neuron can also be processed for electron microscopy to determine the ultrastructural features and microcircuitry of the labeled neuron. Overall this technique is a powerful method to thoroughly characterize neurons during in vivo movement thus allowing substantial insight into the role of the neuron in sensorimotor function.
1. Animal Preparation
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
The method illustrated here is a powerful technique which provides important insight into the function of single neurons and how the response of individual neurons contributes to neuronal circuits.9 This knowledge is fundamental to understanding sensorimotor function. The greatest strength of this technique is that is allows determination of a large number of parameters about a neuron including physiology, morphology and synaptic morphology and distribution. When combined with other techniques such as retrogra.......
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
Experiments on animals were performed in accordance with the guidlines and regulation set forth in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (NIH Publication No. 86-23, revised 1985) and the University of Maryland Animal Care and Use Committee.
I thank Anthony Taylor for initial training in in vivo intracellular recording and A Brown and David Maxwell for help with the initial development of the intracellular staining technique. I thank M. Silver for help with the collocalization macro. Many scholars with whom I have collaborated provided insight into the development of this technique including R. Donga, M. Moritani, P. Luo, R. Ambalavanar. This technique was developed with considerable support from NIH grants DE10132, DE15386 and RR017971.
....Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.
| Name | Company | Catalog Number | Comments |
|---|---|---|---|
| electromagnetic vibrator | Ling Dynamic Systems | V101 | |
| signal generator | Feedback Systems | PFG605 | capable of producing trapezoidal output signal |
| electrode glass | Sutter Instrument Co. | AF100-68-10 | with filament |
| electrode puller | Sutter Instrument Co. | Model P-2000 or P-80 | |
| biotinamide | Vector Laboratories | SP-1120 | stored at 4°C |
| Texas Red avidin DCS | Vector Laboratories | A-2016 | |
| tetramethlyrhodamine | Molecular Probes, Life Technologies | D-3308 | 3000 molecular weight, lysine fixable |
| mouse anti-synaptophysin antibody | Chemicon International | MAB5258 | |
| fluorescent Nissl stain | Neurotrace, Life Technologies | N-21480 | |
| electrode tester | Winston Electronics | BL-1000-B | to measure electrode impedance |
| electrometer | Axon Instruments | Axoprobe 1A, Axoclamp 2B |
Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.