The goal of this protocol is to demonstrate a reliable and reproducible model of the ischemia-reperfusion injury observed in free tissue transfer to enable interventional strategies to be investigated.
Free tissue transfer is defined as the vascular detachment of an isolated block of tissue followed by autologous transplant of that tissue with anastomosis of the flap's transected vessels to native vessels at the recipient site. The procedure is known as FTT and the tissue being transferred referred to as the free flap.
Free tissue transfer is the gold standard approach for the correction of complex, composite defects where local options are unsuitable or unavailable.1-4 Ischemia reperfusion injury (IRI) is inevitable in free tissue transfer, contributes to flap failure5,6 and has no effective treatment. The elective nature of free flap surgeries permits administration of pharmacological agents to precondition against IRI.
IRI results in impaired flow through the microcirculation by endothelial activation and metabolic dysfunction,7 increased capillary permeability and subsequent interstitial edema7, influx of inflammatory cells,8 release of inflammatory mediators, reactive oxygen species9 and complement deposition.10 This complex process of hypoxia and subsequent reperfusion injury ultimately leads to cell death. A model of myocutaneous IRI enables the effectiveness of preconditioning strategies on clinical outcomes to be assessed. Recent work has validated the use of animal models of IRI studies as a surrogate for human IRI by comparing the molecular changes observed in human subjects and existing animal data.10,11
The rat transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous (TRAM) flap was first described in 1987 in German12 and in 199313 in English. This model gained wide popularity13-25 as a cheap, robust model to investigate different strategies to reduce IRI associated with free tissue transfer.14,17-22 The majority of these studies were designed as unipedicled TRAM flaps based on the deep, inferior, epigastric vascular pedicle.15-18,20-22 Comparison of the data from these studies is complicated by the use of different sized cutaneous islands (10.5 - 30 cm2) and different lengths of postoperative follow-up (2 - 10 days). The average total percentage area flap necrosis in the control arm of these studies is 69 ± 6.2% (mean ± SEM). It should be noted that these six papers all employ the rectus abdominis muscle as a carrier for the vascular pedicle but do not expose, divide and microanastomose or clamp the vessels. Zhang et al.23 have described a true, free rat TRAM flap based on the superior epigastric vessels in which the flaps were raised, vessels divided and the myocutaneous flap transferred and microanastomosed to the groin vessels. This difficult technique required the microanastomosis of 0.45 - 0.5 mm caliber vessels. Only fifteen were performed and of these 67% survived.23 The model described by Zhang et al.23 is an excellent model for the human free TRAM flap as it truly mirrors the injury incurred during FTT. The other published models of a rat TRAM flap more accurately reflect the injuries incurred during a human pedicled TRAM but do not accurately reflect the IRI as these flap in do not undergo an ischemic period followed by reperfusion as the vascular pedicle is never clamped or divided and microanastomosis performed. This protocol and video describe a new model of free tissue transfer using the rat TRAM in which the IRI is replicated using microclamps. This more faithfully replicates IRI than the pedicle TRAM predecessors but is technically easier than performing the microanastomosis. Microclamps have been widely employed by transplant researchers to recreate IRI associated with solid organ transplant;26-33however, this is the first time it has been described in the rat TRAM flap.