$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Owing to the overt plasticity of the developing brain, it is important that experimental procedures involving early experiences are thoroughly reviewed and attempts are made to control for all intervening variables. For this reason, a cross litter design is employed during the tactile stimulation procedure to ensure that pups are receiving similar experiences in all other domains of development. In addition, it is also important that multiple pups from multiple litters are selected for analysis to avoid the possibility that effects result from a bias in a single pup or litter.
Tactile stimulation is believed to mimic the naturally occurring maternal behavior, licking and grooming, which is thought to be beneficial to offspring development. Although prior research has emphasized the first week of life (P0-P7) to be a critical period for licking and grooming 16, the sheer magnitude of change identified following 18 days of tactile stimulation may imply that although sensitive times exist, longer exposure is superior. It is also important to note that pups receiving tactile stimulation in this experimental paradigm also experience licking and grooming by their mothers, hence the tactile stimulation is in addition to normal stimulation administered by the mother. Finally, one must also be cognizant of region-dependent changes. Although tactile stimulation during development increased dendritic complexity in the prefrontal cortex, this does not guarantee that structural changes of this nature will be evident in all brain regions. It is possible that neuronal morphology in other brain regions such as the parietal cortex, would respond in a strikingly different manner to the same experience. However, because the tactile stimulation procedure is easily administered and poses no risk to the offspring or dams, it has the potential to serve as a valuable tool for many research studies aimed at improving developmental outcomes.
With respect to Golgi-Cox staining of brain tissue, the critical steps for successful visualization of neuronal cells are as follows: 1) there must be adequate perfusion of the brain with saline solution. Improper or insufficient perfusion of the brain tissue results in blood vessel artifacts that make it difficult to actually visualize neuronal cells through the maze of blood vessels, while also complicating the ability to photograph stained neurons. 2) Perfused brains should be stored in Golgi-Cox solution and sucrose solution in the dark. Storing the brain tissue in the dark reduces the background staining of the tissue, again increasing the chance of successfully visualizing quality neuronal cells. 3) Brain tissue is stored in sucrose solution following the 14 day storage in Golgi-Cox solution. When the tissue is immersed in the 30% sucrose solution for 2-5 days, brains are more pliable which prevents shattering and tearing of sections when cutting. It is important to prevent brain tissue from remaining in the sucrose solution for increased time periods (unless the sucrose solution is continuously replaced with fresh solution) because prolonged storage in sucrose reduces the staining quality. 4) Finally, once slides have been stained and cover slipped, they should be given adequate time to dry before visualization with a microscope. If slides are not permitted to adequately air dry, the tissue may darken, reducing successful visualization of cortical neurons.
Stable changes in psychological functioning and behavioral responses that occur in response to experiences are believed to be facilitated by reorganization of neuronal morphology and synaptic connectivity 17. As these structural changes provide a measurable resource for experience-dependent plasticity, the use of a reliable staining procedure is important. This vibratome based Golgi-Cox staining procedure provides reliable staining of fine branches and dendritic spines that may not be evident with other protocols such as celloidin-embedding. The distinctiveness of the Golgi-Cox procedure stems from its capacity to only stain a small fraction of neuronal elements (1-10%), which permits tracing of single neurons for long distances. Despite the fact that only a small fraction of neurons are impregnated with the stain, cells that are rendered visible, maintain all features including cell body, dendrites, dendritic spines and axons. Moreover, when the staining procedure is carried out correctly, the stained cells stand out clearly and distinctly against a transparent background because other cortical structures remain unstained and transparent. Owing to the realization that persistent changes in outward functioning must be related to the plasticity of the nervous system, i.e. the capability of neurons to modify their structure and connectivity, the Golgi-Cox staining procedure provides researchers with a reliable technique to visualize and quantify this plasticity.