$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is the most common malignancy in children1,2. The overall survival rate for pediatric B-lineage ALL (B-ALL) is approximately 85%, but specific biological subtypes, including T-lineage ALL (T-ALL), have still poorer prognosis even with current therapeutic protocols. Further treatment of relapsed ALL remains a challenge3. Although the majority of adult patients with acute leukemia achieve a remission with up-front chemotherapy, many patients still suffer relapse4. Current chemotherapeutic regimens in the treatment of acute leukemia are known to cause toxicity-associated short- and long-term side effects. Therefore, less toxic therapies that specifically target cancer cells with minimal effect on normal tissues are greatly needed. In recent years, emphasis has been placed on the development of novel, molecularly-targeted agents with specificity for cancer cells, often utilizing iterative chemistry to generate multiple active compounds which must then be compared and prioritized5. This manuscript describes an efficient strategy for pre-clinical evaluation of TKIs for the treatment of acute leukemia, which can be used for evaluation of a single compound or for direct comparison of multiple compounds in order to facilitate drug development.
The method presented here consists of four steps. First the biochemical (1) and anti-leukemia (2) activities of the compound(s) are evaluated in cell culture, then inhibition of the target is confirmed in animal models (3), and finally therapeutic efficacy of the TKI(s) is determined in orthotopic leukemia xenograft models (4). For these studies, it is important to choose relevant cell lines, which are representatives of the most common biologic subtypes. Cell lines should be selected, which both, express the target of interest and lack the target of interest, to investigate whether biologic effects are mediated by inhibition of the target. This is particularly relevant for the development of small molecule inhibitors, which have off-target effects that may be important for anti-tumor activity. It is also necessary to choose a cell line that is dependent on the target for functional effects such as proliferation or survival. Preliminary target validation studies (outside the scope of this article) using RNA interference or other specific means to inhibit the target can be used to identify target-dependent cell lines. It is also desirable to choose cell lines that can form murine xenografts, such that cell culture results can be more directly translated to in vivo experiments.
For evaluation of biochemical activity mediated by TKIs in leukemia cells, a decrease in receptor phosphorylation can be used as an indicator of target inhibition. Western blot analysis or ELISA assays can be employed, depending on the availability and specificity of antibodies. If antibodies with sufficient specificity for the target are available, ELISA assays are preferable as they are more quantitative and efficient. In cases where antibodies with sufficient specificity for ELISA are not available, western blot analysis may be necessary. In this case, immunoprecipitation of a large amount of lysate can be useful for detection of targets that are in low abundance. This approach is particularly relevant for measurement of phospho-proteins, which may have a short half-life to allow for rapid changes in signaling in response to environmental stimuli. Some phosphorylated proteins are extremely labile, most likely as a result of complex formation with phosphatases. For robust and consistent detection of these phosphorylated proteins, it may also be possible to treat cells with pervanadate, an irreversible protein-tyrosine phosphatase inhibitor6, to stabilize the phospho-protein prior to preparation of whole cell lysates.
To determine whether biochemical activity results in anti-tumor effects, target-dependent biological processes can be monitored in cell-based experiments. For leukemia cell lines, anti-leukemia activity mediated by TKIs can be assessed using colony formation assays performed in methylcellulose or soft agar7. Soft agar may be preferred as this is a solid medium that is more amenable to manipulation if repeated treatment with a TKI is necessary. While many acute myloid leukemia (AML) cell lines will form colonies in soft agar, most ALL cell lines will only form colonies in methylcellulose, which is a semi-solid medium. Although it is possible to refresh medium and/or TKIs in methylcellulose cultures, only small volumes can be used and with limited frequency. Similarly, it is more difficult to stain colonies without disrupting them in methylcellulose. Preliminary studies should define the ability of appropriate cell lines to form colonies in methylcellulose and/or soft agar and the optimal density of cells in culture such that colonies are non-overlapping and in sufficient number to obtain statistically relevant data (usually 50-200 colonies per 35 mm plate).
While in vitro assays are robust and cost-effective, and have fewer ethical implications than whole animal experiments, advancement of therapeutic compounds requires proof of efficacy and safety in animal models. For in vivo studies, human acute leukemia cell lines can be orthotopically transplanted into NOD.Cg-Prkdcscid Il2rgtm1Wjl/SzJ (NSG) mice and TKIs can be easily administered by injection or oral gavage. Some cell lines may require exposure of NSG mice to a low cell line-dependent dose of radiation in order for xenografts to establish, and in this instance mice may not tolerate oral gavage without a 5-10 day recovery period post-irradiation. This manuscript describes generation of B-ALL and T-ALL xenografts using specific cell lines (697 and Jurkat) as examples but xenografts may be established in NSG mice using a wide variety of cell lines. In the event that other cell lines are more applicable, the requirement for irradiation, optimal number of cells to transplant, and timing of disease onset and progression should be determined experimentally. Ideally, these models will have complete penetrance (every animal transplanted develops leukemia), consistent kinetics (leukemia progresses similarly in all animals), and a reasonable treatment window (ideally 20-30 days between initiation of treatment and removal from study due to disease). The number of cells transplanted can be increased to improve penetrance and kinetic consistency or decreased to improve the treatment window if necessary.
To determine if TKIs mediate target inhibition in vivo, samples are collected from mice with leukemia xenografts after treatment with TKI or vehicle only. Ideally, the dose and schedule of administration for these experiments are guided by pharmacokinetic studies, which can often be performed by commercial laboratories and are outside the scope of this article. If pharmacokinetic data are available, the concentration of compound required for effective target inhibition in cell culture and the maximum serum concentration following a single dose of TKI can be used to define a starting dose for animal studies. Pharmacokinetic studies can also inform the timing of sample collection post-treatment for pharmacodynamic studies and the route of administration. Inhibition of the target can be assessed in any affected organ but tissues that are most easily collected and processed are preferable. Most acute leukemia cell lines establish in the liver, bone marrow, spleen, peripheral blood, and the central nervous system, although the specific organs affected and the extent of engraftment in these organs varies between models. The protocol presented here assesses phospho-protein inhibition in bone marrow using western blot analysis, but solid organs may be easier to consistently harvest and require minimal or no processing prior to freezing, allowing less opportunity for degradation of phospho-proteins during sample collection and processing. Immunohistochemistry can also be used to evaluate solid tumors or organs affected by leukemia.
Finally, the therapeutic efficacy of the TKI(s) is determined in orthotopic leukemia xenograft models. For these studies, the timing of treatment initiation can be varied, such that disease is more or less established. Treatment may begin immediately after transplant for initial studies and then be delayed in subsequent studies until significant disease burden is detected to more closely approximate a diagnostic treatment model. Ideally, these animal models also have the capacity for non-invasive measurement of disease burden. We have optimized methods for introduction of the firefly luciferase gene into leukemia cell lines using virus-like particles, allowing for non-invasive, longitudinal analysis of disease onset and progression and assessment of disease burden in bone marrow and solid organs. Critical to this approach is the use of monoclonal luciferase-tagged cell lines to prevent variability in development of luciferase-expressing leukemia associated with the use of polyclonal cell lines and is unrelated to treatment with a TKI8.
Taken together, these steps can be used for evaluation of a single TKI or for direct comparison and ranking of multiple TKIs. While the protocols presented here focus on development of TKIs, these methods can be adapted to other targets and considerations for assay development are described. Thus, this strategy may be more broadly applicable to the pre-clinical evaluation of molecularly-targeted agents for treatment of acute leukemia.