$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Nucleases serve a vital role in cells in removing damaged DNA, resolving nonduplex structures such as Holliday junctions and providing proof-reading capacity during DNA replication, both intrinsic within DNA polymerases and extrinsic to them1. Nucleases can act either by sequentially degrading DNA from free ends (exonucleases) or by cleaving internal phosphodiester bonds within a longer DNA molecule (endonucleases). Loss of nuclease activity can result in highly specific genome instability phenotypes. While mutation of the RecQ helicase family member BLM result in excessively high rates of sister chromatid exchange and globally elevated cancer rates (reviewed byPayne and Hickson2), mutation of the highly related WRN protein leads to premature aging3; the major significant difference between these two family members is the presence of a 3'-5' exonuclease domain with in WRN4. Evidence of a critical role of the WRN exonuclease in maintaining genome stability has accumulated from analysis of genotypes in WS patients5, together with point mutation and deletion studies in human cells, backed by crystallographic studies of the isolated exonuclease domain6. However, cooperation and cross talk between WRN's exonuclease activity and its central helicase activity7 makes it difficult to tease apart the functionality of each and their relative contributions to genome stability. In plants and lower metazoan animals, WRN exonuclease activity is present on a single polypeptide lacking helicase activity8-10 (reviewed in Cox and Boubriak11); it has been demonstrated biochemically in Arabidopsis that this exonuclease acts coordinately with the cognate WRN helicase, effectively reconstituting the combined enzyme activities observed in vertebrate WRN9. We have studied WRN exonuclease in Drosophila since the excellent genetic tools allow analysis of the impact of exonuclease mutation (without impacting on the presumptive cognate helicase) at the whole organism level and through development10,12. Moreover, we have cloned, expressed, and purified recombinant Drosophila WRN exonuclease (DmWRNexo) allowing full biochemical analysis of its enzyme properties13,14.
Nuclease analysis in vitro has traditionally been conducted using radiolabeled oligonucleotides, assessing degradation by looking for laddering of products on acrylamide gels4,8,15. While sensitive, such assays are not quantitatively reproducible day-to-day because of radioactive decay of the labeled substrates. Additionally, handling and disposal of radioactive reagents pose significant environmental and health issues; sourcing of radiolabel is also becoming increasingly problematic. An alternative recent method assesses the amount of the final degradation product by mass spectrometry16. However, it is time consuming (taking several days), requires specialized equipment, and the readout is the amount of end product (single nucleotide) so is not suitable for sensitive measurement of aspects such as enzyme processivity or for determining whether some nucleotides, sequences, or modifications lead to nuclease pausing or halt. To overcome these problems, we have adapted the traditional gel-based assays for use with fluorescent oligonucleotide substrates, generating stably labeled substrates that can be used reproducibly over long time periods and thus allow direct comparison of nuclease activities under different conditions.