A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Extracting Visual Evoked Potentials from EEG Data Recorded During fMRI-guided Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

13.5K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/51063

⸱

May 12th, 2014

 , 

In This Article

Summary

This paper describes a method for collecting and analyzing electroencephalography (EEG) data during concurrent transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) guided by activations revealed with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). A method for TMS artifact removal and extraction of event related potentials is described as well as considerations in paradigm design and experimental setup.

Abstract

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) is an effective method for establishing a causal link between a cortical area and cognitive/neurophysiological effects. Specifically, by creating a transient interference with the normal activity of a target region and measuring changes in an electrophysiological signal, we can establish a causal link between the stimulated brain area or network and the electrophysiological signal that we record. If target brain areas are functionally defined with prior fMRI scan, TMS could be used to link the fMRI activations with evoked potentials recorded. However, conducting such experiments presents significant technical challenges given the high amplitude artifacts introduced into the EEG signal by the magnetic pulse, and the difficulty to successfully target areas that were functionally defined by fMRI. Here we describe a methodology for combining these three common tools: TMS, EEG, and fMRI. We explain how to guide the stimulator's coil to the desired target area using anatomical or functional MRI data, how to record EEG during concurrent TMS, how to design an ERP study suitable for EEG-TMS combination and how to extract reliable ERP from the recorded data. We will provide representative results from a previously published study, in which fMRI-guided TMS was used concurrently with EEG to show that the face-selective N1 and the body-selective N1 component of the ERP are associated with distinct neural networks in extrastriate cortex. This method allows us to combine the high spatial resolution of fMRI with the high temporal resolution of TMS and EEG and therefore obtain a comprehensive understanding of the neural basis of various cognitive processes.

Introduction

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (TMS) generates momentary interference to the normal neural activity in target areas of the brain. By creating this transitory neural interference and measuring a behavioral or physiological change, we can draw a causal link between the target area and the measured experimental effect (for a review see Pascual-Leone et al. and Taylor et al.1,2). Such an experimental effect may be, for example, a performance on a cognitive task or a change in electrophysiological (EEG) activity. Indeed, in recent years researchers have started using TMS in combination with EEG to directly relate cortical areas with event-re....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

The experiment is conducted in two separate sessions. During the first session a functional MRI experiment (e.g. a functional localizer) is carried out in order to define the desired TMS target areas on an individual subject basis. The fMRI results are then fed into a stereotactic navigation system for an accurate TMS targeting. The second session is held following the analysis of the fMRI data, during which EEG is recorded concurrently with TMS. The protocol described here was approved by the ethics committee of the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.

In the example given in this paper, data were analyzed with MATLAB version 7.....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

A concurrent EEG-TMS investigation was used to reveal whether the ERP responses to faces and bodies recorded over the occipito-temporal scalp are dissociated. When visual stimuli are presented, a prominent N1 component is recorded at posterior-lateral electrode sites. In particular, the N1 component is typically larger for faces and bodies than to other stimulus categories8,33. By assessing the effect of stimulation on face and body-selective brain areas defined with fMRI on their respective face and body N1 c.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Having the unique ability to momentarily disrupt normal neuronal activity in selected cortical areas, in precise time points and with a relatively good spatial accuracy, TMS allows to causally link a stimulated brain area with a behavioral or a neurophysiological measure. In this paper we described a method for measuring EEG during concurrent TMS application, targeting functionally defined cortical areas, and applying an analysis that enables a reliable measuring of ERP responses. We gave an example from the literature i.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors declare that they have no competing financial interests.

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank David Pitcher for his valuable contribution to this TMS experiment. This research was funded by a fellowship from the Levie-Edersheim-Gitter Institute for Brain Mapping to B.S, a grant from the Wolfson Foundation; grants 65/08 and 1657/08 from the Israeli Science Foundation and a travel grant from the British Council Researcher Exchange Programme to G.Y. The experiment was conducted at the Wohl Institute for Advanced Imaging, Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
3.0 T Signa MRI scannerGeneral Electric
BrainAmp amplifierBrain Products GmbHBP-01300
Electrode input boxBrain Products GmbHOptional
PowerPack - battery for amplifierBrain Products GmbHBP-02615
BrainCap - 32 flat electrodes on a flexible cap Brain Products GmbHBP-0300MRFlat electrodes should be used to assure a shorter distance beween coil and scalp. If larger (e.g. pin type) electrodes are used, remove the ones under the coil
TMS Super Rapid2 stimulatorMagstim
50 mm double coilMagstim
Coil holderAny mechanical arm or tripod that can hold the coil, be adjusted to the right angle and location, and keep the coil steady during stimulation
Chinrest
Polaris infrared cameraRogue Research Inc
Polaris trackers and pointer toolRogue Research Inc
BrainSight workstation and softwareRogue Research Inc
BrainVision Recorder softwareBrain Products GmbHBP-00010
MATLAB softwareThe MathWorks Inc
SPM for MatlabWellcome Department of Imaging Neuroscience, London, UK
MarsBar region of interest toolbox for SPM
Psychtoolbox for MATLABThis toolbox and the E-prime software (below) are examples for stimulus presentation software capable of delivering commands to the TMS stimulator and to the EEG recorder with reliable timing
E-Prime softwarePsychology Software Tools, Inc.

References

  1. Pascual-Leone, A., Walsh, V., Rothwell, J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience--virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 10, 232-237 (2000).
  2. Taylor, P. C., Walsh, V., Eimer, M.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

EEG Artifact RemovalfMRI-guided TMSEvent Related PotentialsStereotactic NavigationERP ExtractionTMS Artifact TemplateConcurrent EEG-TMSFunctional MRI Coregistration