$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Fruit flies, Drosophila melanogaster, have been used as a valuable model organism to study mechanisms underlying complex behaviors, such as learning and memory, social interaction, aggression, drug abuse, sleep, sensory function, courtship, and mating1,2. One behavior that has been studied through multiple protocols is spontaneous locomotor activity. Negative geotaxis was one of the first methods developed for measuring Drosophila activity, and this protocol involves measuring the percentage of flies that reach a certain height of the vial after flies were shaken to the bottom of the container1,3. This method has advantages of being straightforward, inexpensive, and since it does not require any special equipment it can be performed in any laboratory. It has been used as a valuable screening tool to study effects of different genetic manipulations on fly mobility3. However, it is time and labor intensive and has the possibility of bias due to variable shaking of the vials and human recordings.
The negative geotaxis method was improved upon by development of the Rapid Iterative Negative Geotaxis (RING) method4,5, which takes photographs of the fly vials following shaking of the flies to the bottom. The advantage of this protocol is its sensitivity and the possibility of testing a large number of fly vials at the same time. However, this protocol still has the potential for human error, and only measures negative geotaxis. Other laboratories have used simple observation in culture vials to determine locomotor activity6.
Recently several video recording systems for measuring fly locomotor activity have been developed. One video monitoring protocol provides time for adjustment before recording7. The method described by Slawson et al. also uses an air pulse to stop movement until the start of recording, which could potentially be a stressor to the animals7. This method provides information on average speed, max speed, time spend in motion, etc. Another three-dimensional tracking system measures the maximal velocity of individual flies during ~0.2 seconds of free flight takeoff8. A three-dimensional video monitoring protocol uses flies expressing GFP and multiple cameras fitted with filters allowing for detection of fluorescence to determine fly mobility9. Flies in this protocol tend to exhibit cylindrical flight patterns, which is potentially due to the shape of Drosophila culture vials10. This method was improved by using a dome that allows measuring spontaneous movement of two flies11. A high-throughput method that uses a camera to automatically monitor and quantify the individual and social behavior of Drosophila has been also described12. Zou et al. developed a behavioral monitor system (BMS) that uses two computer-assisted cameras to record lifetime behavior and movements such as resting, moving, flying, eating, drinking, or deaths of individual tephritid fruit flies13. Several other video systems have been developed to monitor fly behavioral activity14,15.
Here we describe a method for quantifying Drosophila activity that utilizes population monitors. These monitors are housed in temperature- and humidity-controlled incubators at 25 °C on a 12 hour day-night light cycle. Each population monitor has infrared beams placed in rings positioned at three different heights. Every time a fly moves across the rings it interrupts the infrared beam, which is recorded by a microprocessor that independently records and counts the activity of flies within the vial. A microprocessor uploads the total activity within the vial to the computer at user-defined intervals that could vary from 1 second to 60 minutes. The method described here provides ample time for flies to adjust to the new environment and allows for simultaneous measuring of the spontaneous locomotor activity of as many as 120 populations of flies. In addition, we describe preparation of the food, fly maintenance, setting up the mobility population monitors in temperature controlled incubators, and potential factors that may affect results. This method can be used to study how different environmental or genetic modifications affect spontaneous locomotor activity of the flies.