$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Samples have traditionally been manually microdissected from either whole tissue or slides using a needle and scalpel. This necessitates a clear separation between the tissue section of interest and surrounding tissues sections2. With the current advancements in molecular profiling technology, there has been an increasing need to assess tissue at the cellular level. Due to the limitations of manual microdissection, techniques including LCM were established to allow greater isolation precision. This technique allows the researcher to isolate specific cell populations from various cell and slide types, which can then be used for downstream assays such as gene expression profiling. Although very effective for downstream assays, LCM is not without limitations. First, LCM is an expensive and time consuming process. Additionally, due to the unstable nature of RNA, it is often challenging to obtain high quality RNA from LCM samples2. Due to the disadvantages of LCM, new advances in microdissection technology are still needed to make it more accessible to a greater number of researchers in an affordable and time sensitive manner.
One such advancement in microdissection technology now available is a technique known as mesodissection. In this technique a machine is used to mill the annotated tissue section of interest and aspirates it into a consumable mill bit3. Next, this sample can be aspirated into a collection tube and used for downstream applications. The advantages of this system are that it is significantly less expensive and time sensitive. In our experience, the system allows the dissection of a lung granuloma tissue section in ten minutes. On the other hand, traditional LCM would likely require hours to complete the process. The system allows the operator to load a reference slide to use as a comparison as well as tool for annotation. Additionally a report is generated outlining the area of the slide that was dissected. There are two main disadvantages to mesodissection. Although effective at extracting multiple cells, it is challenging to isolate a single cell. In addition, the precision of the image generated is not as clear as if using other imaging microscopes.
Tuberculosis (TB) is a major infectious disease killer of humanity worldwide and results from infection with Mtb. In a majority of individuals exposed to aerosols of Mtb, the infection is latently limited. In at least 10 million people annually, it results in active TB disease4. During latent infection, Mtb is contained within pathological lung lesions known as granulomas. Hence it has been argued that the outcome of Mtb infection is decided at the level of the granuloma5.
Here we demonstrate how mesodissection can be used to microdissect granulomas caused by Mtb. The slides used are from FFPE lung tissue from infected rhesus macaques. For the purpose of this demonstration, we will dissect granulomas in their entirety. We also demonstrate that RNA can be extracted from the recovered tissue. This technique can be applied to tissue samples from various other specimens and then used for a variety of downstream assays.