A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Visualizing Clathrin-mediated Endocytosis of G Protein-coupled Receptors at Single-event Resolution via TIRF Microscopy

70.8K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/51805

⸱

October 20th, 2014

 ,  , 
1Department of Biological Sciences, Carnegie Mellon University

In This Article

Summary

Clathrin-mediated endocytosis, a rapid and highly dynamic process internalizes many proteins, including signaling receptors. The protocol described here directly visualizes the kinetics of individual endocytic events. This is essential for understanding how core members of the endocytic machinery coordinate with each other, and how protein cargo influence this process.

Abstract

Many important signaling receptors are internalized through the well-studied process of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME). Traditional cell biological assays, measuring global changes in endocytosis, have identified over 30 known components participating in CME, and biochemical studies have generated an interaction map of many of these components. It is becoming increasingly clear, however, that CME is a highly dynamic process whose regulation is complex and delicate. In this manuscript, we describe the use of Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence (TIRF) microscopy to directly visualize the dynamics of components of the clathrin-mediated endocytic machinery, in real time in living cells, at the level of individual events that mediate this process. This approach is essential to elucidate the subtle changes that can alter endocytosis without globally blocking it, as is seen with physiological regulation. We will focus on using this technique to analyze an area of emerging interest, the role of cargo composition in modulating the dynamics of distinct clathrin-coated pits (CCPs). This protocol is compatible with a variety of widely available fluorescence probes, and may be applied to visualizing the dynamics of many cargo molecules that are internalized from the cell surface.

Introduction

The process of clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) is dependent upon the well-timed arrival of the many components of the clathrin-mediated endocytic machinery to gather cargo and manipulate the plasma membrane into the vesicles1-3. CME is initiated by membrane deforming and cargo-adaptor proteins that come together at nascent sites of endocytosis1. These proteins recruit the coat protein clathrin, which assembles into a cage-like structure that forms the clathrin-coated pit (CCP)4. Once the CCP is fully assembled into a spherical shape, membrane scission, primarily through action of the large GTPase, dynamin, generates free clathrin-coated vesicles (CCVs)5,6. This internalization triggers rapid disassembly of the clathrin coat, allowing components to be re-used for multiple rounds of CME.

The discovery and characterization of the proteins involved in CME has been rooted in traditional biochemical, genetic, and microscopy techniques4-6,8. These assays have elucidated the roles and interaction points of these endocytic components. Although very useful for defining essential components of trafficking machinery, these assays are highly limited in capturing the dynamic behavior of CME components or cargo concentration. This is a critical limitation, since CME is driven by the choreographed assembly of sets of protein modules in defined steps, and since small changes in the dynamics of individual endocytic events can have large cumulative consequences on endocytosis. Further, recent data indicate that individual CCPs might differ both in composition and in behavior, suggesting that the physiological regulation of this process is highly spatially and temporally constrained9-14. Visualizing individual endocytic events, therefore, is essential to understand why there are multiple redundant proteins involved in CME and how these proteins might be controlled by physiological signals to regulate cargo internalization.

Here we describe the use of Total Internal Reflection Fluorescence Microscopy (TIRFM) to observe CME at the level of the dynamics of individual CCPs in living cells. TIRFM relies on the difference in refractive index between the glass coverslip and the fluid environment of cells15,16. When the excitation light is directed towards the cells at more than the critical angle, it is internally reflected, creating an evanescent wave that maintains a thin field of illumination extending approximately 100 nm above the coverslip. This ensures that only the fluorescent molecules within this narrow field are excited. Practically, this allows the excitation of fluorescent molecules on or near the plasma membrane, and minimizes fluorescence from the interior parts of the cell. This provides a significantly higher signal-to-noise ratio and z-axis resolution to visualize events at the plasma membrane, compared to more commonly used modes such as conventional epifluorescence or confocal fluorescence microscopy. We also describe, at an introductory and practical level, the use of a commonly used image analysis platform to analyze and quantitate simple morphological features and dynamics of individual cargo endocytic events.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Expression of Fluorescently Tagged CME Components in Cultured Cells

HEK293 cells are useful model cells that have been used extensively to study GPCR biology and endocytosis, and therefore are used as models in this protocol. Use any transfection protocol providing uniform expression without overexpression and low cytotoxicity.

  1. Handle all cell culture in a sterile laminar flow hood. Fill 4 wells of a 12-well plate with 1 ml of Dulbecco’s Modified Essential Media (DMEM) with 10% Fetal Bovine Serum (FBS). From a confluent T25 flask of HEK293 cells dilute 1:50, 1:25, 1:16, 1:10 respectively into each of the 4 wells.
    1. Alternatively, seed cells to a multi-well plate of desired size, as per manufacturer’s instructions. Seed 0.4 - 2 x 104 cells into a 12-well plate. Grow the cells overnight in a sterile 37 °C with 5% CO2 and 95% humidity.
      NOTE: Considering that growth rates vary depending on the conditions and cell lines, it might be preferable to seed multiple wells to ensure ideal confluency for transfection the next day or the possibility of performing transfections in duplicate.
  2. The next morning, select a well that is ~70% confluent for transfection (see Figure 1B). If no well has reached this state, wait another day.
    NOTE: 70% confluency is ideal for HEK293 cells. Transfecting cells that are more sparse results in cell death and toxicity. Transfecting over-confluent cells results in poor expression.
  3. Add 60 µl buffer EC (from transfection kit), 400 ng of plasmids encoding tagged GPCRs and/or components of the clathrin machinery, and 2.4 µl of Enhancer into the 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube, as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. Vortex for 2 sec to ensure sufficient mixing, and spin in a microfuge at 2,000 x g for 2 sec to collect the liquid at the bottom.
  4. Add 6 μl Effectene as described in the manufacturer’s protocol. Vortex for 2 sec, and spin at 2,000 x g for 2 sec in a microfuge to collect the liquid at the bottom. Wait for 20 min to allow for formation of transfection complex micelles.
  5. Aspirate media from the well to be transfected. Gently add 0.8 ml of DMEM with 10% FBS to the transfection reagent mixture and mix by pipetting up and down slowly to reduce breaking the micelles. Add the media and transfection mixture to the well very slowly from the side. Add any remaining transfection mixture from the microcentrifuge tube to the well using a micropipettor.
    NOTE: Optionally, add an extra 0.5 ml of DMEM with 10% FBS to the transfected well to give the cells extra nourishment resulting in gentler transfection and lower transient expression.
  6. Return the cells to the 37 °C incubator for 5 hr.
  7. Aspirate media containing the transfection mixture. Replace with 1 ml of DMEM with 10% FBS. Allow the cells to grow overnight.
  8. The next day, pass the cells to uncoated coverslips, previously sterilized by autoclaving.
    1. Add 0.5 ml of Phosphate Buffered Saline (PBS) with 1 mM EDTA to each well. Alternatively, use 0.5 ml of 0.05% Trypsin-EDTA. Leave in the incubator for 1 min.
    2. Place 3 round, sterile 25 mm coverslips into separate wells of a 6-well plate. Fill each well with 2 ml of media. Gently push the coverslip down to the bottom of the well to prevent cells from growing on the bottom of the coverslip.
    3. Manually agitate the well to lift off the cells from the bottom of the well. Add 1 ml of DMEM with 10% FBS to resuspend. Distribute the lifted cells from 1 well of a 12-well plate evenly among the 3 coverslips. Alternatively, plate cells on 3 glass-bottomed dishes.
  9. Allow the cells to grow on the coverslips for at least 48 hr before imaging. Ensure that cells are spread out and flat.

2. Imaging CCP and Cargo Dynamics Using TIRFM

  1. Conjugate M1 anti-FLAG antibodies with Alexa dyes using Alexa Fluor Protein Labeling kit according to the manufacture’s protocol. Alternatively, pre-conjugated antibodies may be purchased.
  2. Pre-incubate cells with the antibodies at a 1:1,000 dilution in 1 ml of pre-warmed Leibovitz medium with 10% FBS, or Opti-MEM with 50 mM HEPES pH 7.4 and 10% FBS for 10 min at 37 °C (imaging medium), to label FLAG-tagged GPCRs on the cell surface. Skip these steps if genetically encoded fluorescent proteins, such as GFP, are used as tags (see discussion for details).
  3. Transfer the coverslip to a live-cell imaging chamber. Alternatively, for glass-bottomed dishes, aspirate antibody-labeling media and add 700 µl of pre-warmed imaging medium.
    1. Use a pair of forceps and bend the tip of a 25 gauge needle into a hook.
    2. Hold a pair of forceps in the dominant hand. Hold the bent needle in the other. Turn the needle until the hook curves down towards the glass. Gently drag the needle, hook side down, across the bottom of a 6-well plate until it hooks onto the coverslip. Take care to not scratch the surface of the coverslip, as it will detach cells. Gently lift the coverslip up from the bottom of the well. Balance the coverslip against wall of the well for support.
    3. Use the forceps to grasp near the edge of the coverslip and move the coverslip cell side up to the imaging chamber, and assemble the chamber. Add 700 µl (or appropriate amount) of pre-warmed imaging medium. Handle the coverslips carefully without pressure to prevent cracking or breaking.
  4. Transfer the chamber onto the microscope and keep the temperature of the cells at 37 °C using a stage heater or an enclosed incubator.
  5. Bring cells into focus using a 100X or 60X TIRF oil-immersion objective (1.45 NA or above). Image the cells in conventional epifluorescence or confocal modes of illumination (i.e. not TIRFM) to identify cells expressing the appropriate constructs. Out-of-focus cells are nearly invisible in the thin depth of TIRF illumination making it difficult to find the focal plane and cells.
    NOTE: Some systems use the same lasers for TIRFM to image in conventional epifluorescence, by moving the angle of incidence of the laser above the critical angle. As an important safety precaution, always be aware of the angle of the laser beam, and always direct it away from the observer.
  6. Focus down to the bottom surface of an expressing cell until the outline of plasma membrane around the cell disappears and the center of the cell appears. This is most apparent with a plasma membrane localized cargo protein such as the µ-opioid receptor (see Figure 2A).
  7. Switch to TIRF imaging.
    1. If using the same lasers for imaging in conventional epifluorescence, increase the angle of incidence of the laser until out-of-focus fluorescence in the interior of the cell disappears, and no outline of plasma membrane around the cell is seen. (Compare Figure 2C to Figures 2A and 2B)
      NOTE: In TIRFM, moving the focal plane causes the image to go completely out of focus and/or dim, and the overall fluorescence levels decreases due to the smaller depth of illumination. Therefore, an alternate method to switch to TIRFM illumination is to first focus on the center of the cell in confocal/conventional epifluorescence, then increase the angle of incidence until you lose most of the fluorescence, and then focus down to the plasma membrane.
    2. Once in TIRFM, ensure the excitation laser reflects back through the objective and is not visible above the objective. Confirm this by checking if the laser spot is visible.
      NOTE: In conventional epifluorescence or confocal modes, the laser illumination is visible above the objective, such as on the ceiling.
    3. Refine the focus to get a crisp image. The main components of the endocytic machinery, such as clathrin, will be visible in puncta. Adjust the focus on fine, so the puncta are as round as possible.
      NOTE: For membrane-localized cargo, adjust the fine focus until the filopodia appear distinct.
    4. Use an acquisition program to save all the imaging parameters such as mirrors and TIRF angle. Do this for all necessary wavelengths.
  8. Scan around the coverslip to find cells expressing all desired endocytic markers: the µ-opioid receptor and the adapter β-arrestin in the example shown in Figure 3A. Select cells that are expressing but not over-expressing. See discussion for details.
  9. Once cells are identified, acquire images every 3 sec for 10 min. This is sufficient to capture the lifetime of a CCP, since the average lifetime of a CCP in HEK293 cells imaged under these conditions is around 40 sec10-11. This allows about 12-14 frames to observe the CCP. For example see Movie 1. Repeat all steps to image additional cells.

3. Analysis of Endocytic Dynamics by Manual Verification

Although manual verification of CCP lifetimes is greatly limited by the number of CCPs that can be detected, it still remains an accurate means of detection undeterred by global changes in the image and detection artifacts. See discussion for details.

  1. Open the file in ImageJ. Images are stored as a single stack of tiff files with interleaved channels. Convert images to hyperstacks. Go to Image > Hyperstacks > Stack to Hyperstack. Enter the number of channels acquired (i.e. if imaging β-arrestin and the µ-opioid receptor, enter 2), Enter 1 for Z stack (TIRFM is a single plane), and the number of frames of the movie (i.e. a 10 min movie at 1 frame every 3 sec is 200) in the pop-up window.
  2. The hyperstack format yields a window with two scroll bars. Use the top bar to move through the channels and the bottom to move through time. Scroll to the channel of the protein whose lifetimes will be assayed.
  3. Move to frame 10 or 15 of the movie to reduce the inclusion of pre-existing CCPs whose entire durations are not visible. Draw an ROI box around a spot chosen at random.
  4. Count the number of frames a spot is visible.
    NOTE: See Figure 3B and 3C for examples of three morphological categories of endocytic events10,11,16-19.

4. Analysis of Endocytic Dynamics by Objective Recognition

Objective recognition allows detection of virtually all of the imaged CCPs in a cell, but can be prone to error due to spurious detection of erroneous structures. See discussion for details weighing the advantages and disadvantages of each method. Several programs, including custom-built algorithms, may be used to objectively detect CCPs. This protocol describes objective recognition of CCPs using Imaris, an image-analysis software (see Materials).

  1. To begin, open the raw image file in the image-analysis software. By default, a merged color image appears. Use the “Display Adjustment” window to adjust the brightness of a channel. Click on the name of a channel to change the displayed color. Uncheck the box next to the channel to prevent its display (See Figure 4A).
  2. Create “Spots” by clicking on the icon with orange spots. See Figure 4B. Select a Region of Interest (ROI) around the cell. See Figure 4C. Use a ROI to exclude areas that will incorrectly detect bright leading edges and plaques. Analyze multiple cells with different expression levels separately.
  3. Measure the diameter of a Spot to provide initial estimates for the algorithm. Switch to “Slice” mode, and click on polar ends of a spot to measure its diameter. See Figure 4E. Do this for 4 or 5 round Spots that look indicative of a CCP at the height of its stability, after formation and before scission. Use these measurements to calculate average diameter down to the nearest tenth of a micron.
  4. Detect Spots. Return to “Surpass” mode. Select the appropriate channel for detection. Enter the average measured diameter, usually 0.3 or 0.4 μm. Click the blue forward arrow to quantify the Spots. See Figure 4E. If the diameter of Spots is underestimated, spurious points of fluorescence will be identified as Spots. If the diameter is too large, true Spots will be ignored. When unsure, estimate a little bit lower, and filter out the incorrect detections later.
  5. Filter Spots by Quality. Adjust the filter to capture as many Spots as possible without background. The Quality filter is selected by default20. See Figure 4F.
    1. Use the “Quality” curve as a guide to set an appropriate threshold. Move the bottom threshold of the filter with the left mouse button to this first dip in the curve. This is a good starting point for the filter, as this position usually refines detection to only visible Spots. See Figure 4F.
    2. Detected Spots appear on the movie as spheres or center pixels. Using the “Colors” tab, adjust the color of the Spots to a contrasting color to make it easier to see them. Scroll through the movie to review the Spots in each frame. The goal is to detect as many Spots as possible for the entirety of their lifetimes.
    3. Eliminate dimmer Spots or manually connect them into continuous tracks later on, as they are not detected well through the course of their lifetimes.
    4. Remove bright plaques with an “Intensity” filter, if required. Click the green plus sign to add a new filter. See Figure 4F. Create an Intensity filter to filter in or out Spots of a given fluorescence signals. Use the generated Intensity curve, (analogous to Quality Curve discussed in 4.5) to set the threshold. Use the left mouse button to remove the extreme left end of the curve that represents the brightest Spots.
      NOTE: Large plaque structures are usually among the brightest elements in the cell, and they are easily excluded with this filter.
    5. Scroll through the movie to ensure that the CCPs are detected as Spots and the brightest plaques are no longer detected. Figure 3D shows a cell where detection of CCPs (denoted by white spheres) was optimized with the quality filter and plaques were excluded with the quality filter.
    6. Reduce bright cell edges with the quality filter. Bright objects may still need to be removed manually, at the next step. Continue with the blue arrow.
    7. Remove aberrant Spots in the Edit Spots screen. Switch to “Select” mode. Click on the spot. It will turn yellow. Click “Delete”. Click the blue arrow to continue building the algorithm. See Figure 4G.
  6. Measure tracks. Set tracks to “Brownian motion.” The CCP should not exhibit any directed movement, only minimal drifting across the plasma membrane. This algorithm is most appropriate for that motion. See Figure 4H.
    1. Set the Max Distance to a small value such as 0.7 µm. See Figure 4H.
      NOTE: Setting a small distance minimizes connection of adjacent Spots and still allows for continued tracking of a cell spot through CCP or cell movement.
    2. Set Max Gap Size to 1. This allows a track to continue if there is only one frame missing in succession. Click the blue arrow to calculate tracks. See Figure 4H.
      NOTE: Gap sizes of more than 3 causes different tracks to be incorrectly linked together.
    3. Switch track viewing to “Dragon Tail.” Scroll through the movie observing the detection quality. If adjacent Spots are being connected, decrease the Max Distance below 0.7 µm. If Spots are being broken up too readily, increase the Max Gap Size. Click the blue arrow to create tracks. This leads to the filter tracks screen. See Figure 4H.
  7. Filter Tracks and Export Data. Use an “Intensity” filter to remove additional bright plaques. Use a “Displacement” filter to remove endosomes that enter the TIRF field. Use caution, as longer Spots will have longer displacements as well. Click the green double arrow to complete the protocol. See Figure 4I.
    1. Use the Edit Tracks tab, with the pencil icon, to remove false positive detections of Tracks that could not be removed by filters. Check for discontinuities or false connections. To connect two tracks, select them using Ctrl-Left-Click, then click on “Connect” in the Edit Tracks box. To disconnect tracks into separate spots, select a track and hit “Disconnect”. Select multiple Spots with Ctrl+Left-Click and click “Connect” to create a new Track. The method is the same for Editing Spots, described in 4.5.7. See Figure 4J.
    2. To export data, go to the statistics tab. Click on the single floppy disk icon to export the selected statistic. Click on the icon that looks like a series of floppy disks to export all statistics. The “Track Duration” statistic contains the length of the endocytic tracks. See Figure 4K.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Using live-cell TIRF Microscopy we have recorded the endocytic dynamics of the µ-opioid-receptor (MOR), a G-protein coupled receptor (GPCR) and its endocytic adaptor protein β-arrestin. The β-arrestin construct was transiently transfected into a stably expressing MOR cell line using the protocol outlined in Figure 1, and imaged 96 hr later. The MOR in the stable cell line is N-terminally tagged with a pH-sensitive GFP. This fluorescent protein only fluoresces in the neutral extracellular fluid. Also, the...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Here we describe the use of TIRFM to visualize clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME) at the level of individual CCPs in living cells in real time. CME is a rapid and highly dynamic event mediated by the cumulative effect of many spatially and temporally separate individual events. Most assays that are currently used, such as biochemical measurements of internalization using surface biotinylation or ligand binding, flow-cytometry or fixed cells assays measuring amount of internalized proteins, or electron microscopic locali...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Drs. C. Szalinski, H. Teng, and M. Bruchez for help with Imaris, R. Vistein, and D. Shiwarski for technical help and advice, and Dr. M von Zastrow, Dr. T Kirchhausen, Dr. D Drubin, and Dr. W Almers for reagents and helpful discussion. Funding provided by T32 grant NS007433 to SLB and NIH DA024698 and DA036086 to MAP.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
DMEM/High Glucose with L-glutamine and sodium pyruvateFisher Scientific SH3024301
Dulbecco's Phosphate Buffered Saline (DPBS), no calcium, no magnesiumGibco, by Life Technologies21600-010
EDTA Free AcidAmresco0322-500G
Fetal Bovine SerumGibco, by Life Technologies10437-028
Leibovitz's L-15 Medium, no phenol redGibco, by Life Technologies21083-027
Opti-MEMGibco, by Life Technologies
HEPESCellPURE by Fisher ScientificBP2937-100
EffecteneQiagen301425Transfection reagent
25 mm coverglassFisher Scientific12-545-86
Corning cell culture treated flasks, 25 cm2Fisher Scientific10-126-28
Cell culture 6-well plateGreiner Bio-One, by VWR82050-896
Monoclonal ANTI-FLAG M1Sigma AldrichF3040-5MG
[D-Ala2, N-Me-Phe4, Gly5-ol]-Enkephalin acetate salt (DAMGO)Sigma AldrichE7384-5MG
Alexa Fluor 647 Protein Labeling KitLife TechnologiesA20173
ImageJNIHhttp://rsb.info.nih.gov/ij/
Imaris Image analysis softwareBitPLanehttp://www.bitplane.com/imaris/imaris, for automated analysis
Nikon Eclipse Ti inverted microscope and required accessories including filter cubes and filtersNikon
Nikon TIRF arm with required adapters for Nikon Eclipse TiNikonFor adjusting angle of incidence
iXon+ EMCCD camera and adaptersAndor

References

  1. McMahon, H. T., Boucrot, E. Molecular mechanism and physiological functions of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 12 (8), 517-533 (2011).
  2. Kaksonen, M., Toret, C. P., Drubin, D. G. A Modular Design for the Clathrin- and Actin-Mediated Endocytosis Machinery. Cell. 123 (2), (2005).
  3. Taylor, M. J., Perrais, D., Merrifield, C. J. A High Precision Survey of the Molecular Dynamics of Mammalian Clathrin-Mediated Endocytosis. PLoS Biology. 9 (3), (2011).
  4. Ungewickell, E., Branton, D. Assembly units of clathrin coats. Nature. 289 (5796), 420-422 (1981).
  5. Bliek, A. M., Meyerowrtz, E. M. Dynamin-like protein encoded by the Drosophila shibire gene associated with vesicular traffic. Nature. 351 (6325), (1991).
  6. Hinshaw, J. E., Schmid, S. L. Dynamin self-assembles into rings suggesting a mechanism for coated vesicle budding. Nature. 374 (6518), (1995).
  7. Merrifield, C. J., Perrais, D., Zenisek, D. Coupling between Clathrin-Coated-Pit Invagination, Cortactin Recruitment, and Membrane Scission Observed in Live Cells. Cell. 121 (4), 593-606 (2005).
  8. Grabs, D., Slepnev, V. I., et al. The SH3 domain of amphiphysin binds the proline-rich domain of dynamin at a single site that defines a new SH3 binding consensus sequence. The Journal of biological chemistry. 272 (20), 13419-13425 (1997).
  9. Tosoni, D., Puri, C., et al. TTP Specifically Regulates the Internalization of the Transferrin Receptor. Cell. 123 (5), 875-888 (2005).
  10. Puthenveedu, M. A., von Zastrow, M. Cargo Regulates Clathrin-Coated Pit Dynamics. Cell. 127 (1), 113-124 (2006).
  11. Soohoo, A. L., Puthenveedu, M. A. Divergent modes for cargo-mediated control of clathrin-coated pit dynamics. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 24 (11), 1725-1734 (2013).
  12. Posor, Y., Eichhorn-Gruenig, M., et al. Spatiotemporal control of endocytosis by phosphatidylinositol-3,4-bisphosphate. Nature. 10, (2013).
  13. Mettlen, M., Stoeber, M., Loerke, D., Antonescu, C. N., Danuser, G., Schmid, S. L. Endocytic accessory proteins are functionally distinguished by their differential effects on the maturation of clathrin-coated pits. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 20 (14), 3251-3260 (2009).
  14. Loerke, D., Mettlen, M., et al. Cargo and dynamin regulate clathrin-coated pit maturation. PLoS Biology. 7 (3), (2009).
  15. Axelrod, D. Cell-substrate contacts illuminated by total internal reflection fluorescence. The Journal of Cell Biology. 89 (1), 141-145 (1981).
  16. Merrifield, C. J., Feldman, M. E., Wan, L., Almers, W. Imaging actin and dynamin recruitment during invagination of single clathrin-coated pits. Nature Cell Biology. 4 (9), 691-698 (2002).
  17. Ehrlich, M., Boll, W., et al. Endocytosis by random initiation and stabilization of clathrin-coated pits. Cell. 118 (5), 591-605 (2004).
  18. Yarar, D., Waterman-Storer, C. M., Schmid, S. L. A dynamic actin cytoskeleton functions at multiple stages of clathrin-mediated endocytosis. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 16 (2), 964-975 (2005).
  19. Rappoport, J. Z., Kemal, S., Benmerah, A., Simon, S. M. Dynamics of clathrin and adaptor proteins during endocytosis. American journal of physiology. Cell physiology. 291 (5), (2006).
  20. Doyon, J. B., Zeitler, B., et al. Rapid and efficient clathrin-mediated endocytosis revealed in genome-edited mammalian cells. Nature Cell Biology. 13 (3), 331-337 (2011).
  21. Hopp, T. P., Prickett, K. S., et al. A Short Polypeptide Marker Sequence Useful for Recombinant Protein Identification and Purification. Bio/Technology. 6 (10), 1204-1210 (1988).
  22. Miesenböck, G., De Angelis, D. A., Rothman, J. E. Visualizing secretion and synaptic transmission with pH-sensitive green fluorescent proteins. Nature. 394 (6689), 192-195 (1998).
  23. Saffarian, S., Cocucci, E., Kirchhausen, T. Distinct Dynamics of Endocytic Clathrin-Coated Pits and Coated Plaques. PLoS Biology. 7 (9), (2009).
  24. Yudowski, G., Puthenveedu, M., Henry, A., von Zastrow, M. Cargo-Mediated Regulation of a Rapid Rab4-Dependent Recycling Pathway. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 1, 1-11 (2009).
  25. Batchelder, E. M., Yarar, D. Differential Requirements for Clathrin-dependent Endocytosis at Sites of Cell-Substrate Adhesion. Molecular Biology of the Cell. 21 (17), 3070-3079 (2010).
  26. Mattheyses, A. L., Atkinson, C. E., Simon, S. M. Imaging Single Endocytic Events Reveals Diversity in Clathrin, Dynamin and Vesicle Dynamics. Traffic. 12 (10), 1394-1406 (2011).
  27. Aguet, F., Antonescu, C. N., Mettlen, M., Schmid, S. L., Danuser, G. Advances in analysis of low signal-to-noise images link dynamin and AP2 to the functions of an endocytic checkpoint. Dev Cell. 26 (3), 279-291 (2013).
  28. Boucrot, E., Howes, M. T., Kirchhausen, T., Parton, R. G. Redistribution of caveolae during mitosis. J Cell Sci. 124, 1965-1972 (2011).
  29. Bhaya, D., Davison, M., Barrangou, R. CRISPR-Cas systems in bacteria and archaea: versatile small RNAs for adaptive defense and regulation. Annual review of genetics. 45, 273-297 (2011).
  30. Boch, J., Scholze, H., et al. Breaking the Code of DNA Binding Specificity of TAL-Type. III Effectors. Science. 326 (5959), 1509-1512 (2009).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Tags

Clathrin Coated PitsFluorescence MicroscopyImage AnalysisLive Cell ImagingEndocytic DynamicsCargo Composition
Visualizing Clathrin-mediated Endocytosis of G Protein-coupled Receptors at Single-event Resolution via TIRF Microscopy
Contact Us
Recommend to Library

Privacy

Terms of Use

Policies

Copyright © 2026 MyJoVE Corporation. All rights reserved.