$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Ten adult older people living with HIV (Age: 57.2 ± 9.2 years, BMI: 27.0 ± 2.8) underwent 6 weeks (twice a week) training and successfully completed all sessions and their results were analyzed..
The participants showed a significant reduction in center of mass (CoM) sway (78.2%, p = .045) during the semi-tandem balance stance with eyes closed, one of the more difficult positions for this population subset (Figure 3). Participants show a significant increase in gait speed during a dual task motor-cognitive assessment (9.3%, p = .048) with an increase in stride velocity of over 0.1 m/sec that achieved statistical significance (Figure 4). The pain questionnaire also showed a significant reduction in reported pain (43.5%, p = .041), an important indicator for quality of life assessment (Figure 5).
Those participants who indicated depression (> 16) at baseline, as assessed by the CES-D questionnaire, reported a trend of slower gait speed during single task walk (<1.3 m/sec, R2 = 0.2911). This group with slower baseline gait speed showed a trend for greater improvement in delta gait speed for pre vs. post-intervention (R2 = 0.3906). Another trend was observed relating change in gait speed to frailty status. Non-frail patients reported reductions averaging -0.08 m/sec in their gait speed during initiation and steady state phase at follow-up from baseline (p = 0.125) whereas, patients classified as pre-frail due to depression at baseline reported improvements averaging .09 and .082 m/sec in their gait speed during initiation and steady state phase, respectively, post-intervention versus baseline (p = 0.143).

Figure 1: Subject Performing Motor-cognitive Ankle Reaching Task with Support of Walker. Subject is viewing a virtual representation of himself (avatar) on the screen. His motion is in response to the auditory and visual feedback from the screen in front of him provided by the biosensors seen at the ankles, thighs and waist. The individual gave written consent to being photographed.

Figure 2: Subject Performing Obstacle-crossing Task with Support of Walker. The subject sees only his lower limbs on the screen and alternates moving his legs to avoid hitting the virtual obstacle displayed on the screen. The individual gave written consent to being photographed.

Figure 3: Improvement in Center of Mass Sway during a Single Stance Pose, Pre- and Post-intervention. The subject demonstrates a reduction in movement, i.e., sway, indicating improved balance. Error bars represent SEM.

Figure 4: Improvement in Stride Velocity, Pre- and Post-intervention. Stride velocity is measured in units of m/sec. A faster velocity is indicative of better physical performance. The error bars represent SEM.

Figure 5: Improvement in Pain Assessment, Pre- and Post-intervention. This is obtained from a self- reported questionnaire noting a reduction in daily pain (on a scale of 0-10). The error bars represent SEM.
| Session | Activities Performed | Time |
| Baseline | Balance and gait exercises | Total time 20 min; each exercise (6) and balance poses (6) are 2-3 min in duration |
| Session 1 | Balance and ankle reach exercises | Total time 25 min; balance poses (4) are 2-3 min and 3 sets of 3 of ankle reaching task, each set is 5 min |
| Sessions 2-7 | Balance, ankle reach and obstacle crossing exercises at 5% and 10% height of subject | Total time 35 min; obstacle crossing, each height is 5 min |
| Midline | Repeat baseline | Total time 20 min; each exercise (6) and balance poses (6) are 2-3 min in duration |
| Sessions 9-12 | Same as 2-7 sessions plus motor-cognitive ankle reach and obstacle crossing at 15% and 20% height of subject | Total time is 45 min; additional 10 min for each of the added two heights |
| Follow up | Repeat baseline | Total time 20 min; each exercise (6) and balance poses (6) are 2-3 min in duration |
Table 1: Training Sessions and Exercises.