Method Article

An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model

DOI:

10.3791/55225

May 31st, 2017

In This Article

Summary

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Here, we introduce a method to evaluate transpedicular screws by using an in vivo porcine lumbar spine model.

Abstract

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Pedicle screw fixation is the gold standard for the treatment of spinal diseases. However, many studies have reported the issue of loosening pedicle screws after spinal surgery, which is a serious concern. To address this problem, diverse types of pedicle screws have been examined to identify those with good fixation strength and osseointegration in spine bone. The porcine spine is a good alternative for the human spine in the evaluation of pedicle screws due to the anatomical size, mechanical characteristics, and cost. Although several studies have reported that pedicle screws are efficient in the porcine model, no study has described detailed protocols for the evaluation of a pedicle screw using the porcine model. Here, we describe a detailed method for evaluating transpedicular screws using an in vivo porcine lumbar spine model. The technical details for anesthesia, spine surgery, and harvest provided here will facilitate with the evaluation of the transpedicular screw fixation model.

Introduction

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

Transpedicular screw fixation is a gold-standard treatment for degenerative lumbar spine and bursting fracture because it involves three columns of the spine and achieves stabilization1,2. However, most patients who undergo such surgery also have osteoporosis3,4. Many studies have evaluated the fixation strength and the osseointegration status of transpedicular screws, because the loosening of pedicle screws currently in use has been reported in patients with osteoporosis5,6.

The porcine spine is similar to the human spine in terms of size. It is less expensive compared to a primate model7. Furthermore, an in vivo mechanical study has demonstrated that the quadruped porcine spine is essentially loaded in the same way as that of the human spine8, which is why many researchers use porcine spines for studies on the prevention of pedicle screw loosening. However, it takes several months to study pedicle screws in the porcine spine because identifying the long-term stability of pedicle screws takes times. In order to compare different types of screws in the vertebral body, it is necessary to insert the screws in similar positions. Therefore, researchers should be well-acquainted with proper anesthesia techniques, standardized surgical protocols, and harvest procedures before performing any experiments. Here, we describe a detailed method for anesthesia, surgery, and harvest for the evaluation of pedicle screw fixation using a porcine spine model, including ex vivo imaging, histology, and strength testing.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee of Chonbuk National University approved this study. The treatment, use, and handling of animals followed all guidelines and policies. Maintain the operating room at 24 °C.

1. Anesthesia

  1. Acclimatize miniature pigs, aged 12 months, in the experimental unit for at least one week. Perform a clinical examination measuring the respiratory rate, heartrate, and body temperature. Do not feed each miniature pig for 12 h before the anesthesia procedure.
  2. Inject atropine (0.05 mg/kg) and ketamin (20 mg/kg)/ xylaxine (2 mg/kg)  into the lateral cervical muscle region, behind the ear, for premedication.
  3. After sedation, tightly apply a rubber band around the base of the ear and clean the ear with topical alcohol.
  4. Place an over-the-needle plastic catheter in the ear vein and remove the rubber band. Confirm that the catheter is correctly placed. Flush the catheter with heparinized saline and fix with tape.
  5. For endotracheal intubation, position the miniature pig in sternal recumbency. With the help of an assistant, hold the jaw of the pig with a suitable sling and open its mouth.
    1. Pass the tip of laryngoscope into the pharyngeal cavity to displace the epiglottis from the soft palate. Use the tip of the laryngoscope blade to make the vocal cords visible and advance the endotracheal tube into the trachea during expiration.
    2. Feel for a free passage of air for proper intubation and check the chest auscultation for respiration sounds in both left and right sides of the miniature pig.
  6. Fill cuff with appropriate volume of air of the endotracheal tube with air using a 10-mL syringe and fix the tube to the snout using adhesive tape.
  7. Provide a 2.0% concentration of isoflurane, an inhalation anesthetic for prolonged anesthesia, through the endotracheal intubation tube. Test the corneal and palpebral reflexes to confirm the anesthetization and use ointment on the eyes to prevent dryness.
  8. Monitor the cardiovascular system, the respiratory system, and the body temperature during anesthesia at least every 5 min until the miniature pig recovers.
  9. 30 min before the spine surgery, apply 30 mg/kg cefazolin IV slowly, the 1st generation of cephalosporin antibiotics.
  10. Administer 5 - 10 mL/kg/h of warm (37 °C) saline using an IV line to maintain homeostasis and provide 50 µg/kg/min of fentanyl to control pain.
  11. After the spine surgery, perform extubation when a strong swallowing reflex is apparent.
  12. Take the miniature pig into a room and monitor until it recovers from anesthesia. Provide food and water when the miniature pig is fully conscious.
  13. Apply 3 mg/kg enrofloxacin antibiotic with 4.4 mg/kg carprofen daily for pain control during the first 3 days.
  14. Monitor the pig daily until the removal of the sutures.

2. Spine Surgery

  1. Autoclave the transpedicular screws and posterior fixator systems for sterilization, following the manufacturer's guidelines.
  2. Shave the back of the miniature pig, approximately 10 cm from the center to the left or right, using a shaver while the pig is in a supine position. Clean the skin with povidone-iodine solution and 70% alcohol.
  3. Make a longitudinal midline incision from the second spinous process of the lumbar spine to the first median sacral crest using a scalpel. Dissect through the subcutaneous tissue and fascia to the tip of the spinous processes.
  4. Elevate the paraspinal muscles subperiosteally from the underlying laminae using a Cobb elevator. Dissect along the spinous process and lamina limited to the facet joints.
  5. Open the superficial cortex of the entry point (which is just inferior to the mammillary process from L3 to L5 on both sides) with a burr or a rongeur.
  6. Insert the guide pin at an open site, parallel to the superior endplate and at a 20° angle to the spinous process. Define the ideal starting point using C-arm or portable postero-anterior/lateral X-rays.
  7. Insert a pedicle probe up to 25 mm according to the X-ray. Confirm the complete intraosseous trajectory by pedicle and body palpation using a pedicle sounding device.
  8. Insert six pedicle screws into the prepared pedicle of L3 to L5 until the screw head is well-seated. Point the side opening of the implant head in the desired direction and align the horizontal position with the rod trajectory.
  9. Insert two rods into both sides of the pedicle screw heads, respectively. Put in the sleeve and nut at the pedicle screw head using a universal handle.
  10. Loosely tighten the nut using a straight socket wrench and firmly tighten the nut using a counter torque wrench.
  11. Confirm the positions of the pedicle screws using portable postero-anterior/lateral X-rays.
    NOTE: Wait for the miniature pig to wake up and check the gait patterns and motor function of the hind limb to determine whether a screw has been badly implanted.
  12. Irrigate the surgery site with 3 L of normal saline using a bulb irrigation syringe with suctioning.
  13. Place a silicone drain in the surgery site and take out the silicone tip. Close the paraspinal muscles and subcutaneous using 1.0 metric absorbable sutures. Close the skin with 2.0 metric non-absorbable nylon sutures.
  14. Disinfect the suture site with povidone-iodine and apply a dressing using sterilized gauze and tape.

3. Harvest Procedure

  1. At 12 weeks postoperatively, inject xylazine (2 mg/kg) and ketamine (10 mg/kg) into the lateral cervical muscle region, behind the ear, for premedication.
  2. After sedation, administer 15 mg/kg KCl  directly into the ear vein catheter for euthanasia.
  3. Make a longitudinal midline incision at the previous surgery scar lesion. Dissect the soft tissue and paraspinal muscles.
  4. Expose the spinous process of the lumbar spines, laminas, rods, nuts, and transverse processes from L3 to L5.
  5. Remove the nuts using a counter torque wrench and rods. Cut the L2-3 disc space and the L5-S1 disc space using an oscillating saw.
  6. Dissect both sides of middle and anterior part of the L3-5 spine with a Cobb elevator and tower forceps. After harvest, if the spine cannot be tested immediately, wrap it in gauze soaked with saline and store at -20 °C.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

A detailed protocol for anesthesia, surgery, and harvest for the evaluation of transpedicular screws using an in vivo porcine lumbar spine model is described here. This protocol is suitable for a number of downstream analyses, including mechanical testing (Figure 1), quantitative micro-CT evaluation (Figure 2), and histology (Figure 3). Representative mechanical testing (Figure 1) shows the mean extraction torsio...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The evaluation of transpedicular screws in the porcine spine requires much time and effort. First, the miniature pig is a large animal. For animal care and anesthesia, the researcher needs a specialized protocol. Second, surgery should maintain an environment similar to that of human surgery. The purpose of evaluating pedicle screws in the porcine spine is to develop an efficient screw that can be applied to humans. Third, evaluating the long-term stability of transpedicular screws requires about three months after the s...

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

The authors have nothing related to this paper to disclose.

Acknowledgements

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,

This study was supported by a grant (CNUH-BRI-2012-02-005) funded by the Biomedical Research Institute of Chonbuk National University Hospital (CNUH-BRI), Republic of Korea.

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Miniature pigOrientBio
AtropineJeil pharmaceuticalA04900241Anesthesia
Over-the needle plastic catheterBDREF382412Maintenance of IV line
KetamineYuhanA04502441Anesthesia
XylazineBayer KoreaA00800071Anesthesia
LaryngoscopeKarl storzIntubation
Endotracheal tubeCovidienIntubation
IsofluraneJW pharmaceutical CoA02104781Anesthesia
Eye ointmentHanlim pharmaA37851721Protection of pig's eye
CefazolinDonga pharmaA01503951Antibiotics
SalineJW pharmaceutical CoA02151392Maintenance of fluid homeostasis
FentanylHana pharmC03200032Pain control
EnrofloxacinBayer93106-60-6 Antibiotics
MorphineMyungmoon pharmaC03700091Pain control
MeloxicamBoehringer IngelheimA07600711Antibiotics
Povidone-iodineHyundai pharmaWound dressing
Scalpel blade size 15Braun I1 BB515Skin incision
Cobb elevatorCodman65-2546Dissection of muscle
BurrMedtronicMaking of starting point of screw
RongeurAesculapFO515RMaking of starting point of screw
Guide pin (K-wire)CE01067803Guidance of screw trajectory
C-armGEOEC 9800 plusGuidance of screw trajectory
Portable X-raySiemensMobile XP hybridGuidance of screw trajectory
Pedicle probeOtisBiotechSPI-02-01Guidance of screw trajectory
Pedicle sounding deviceOtisBiotechSPI-03-01Guidance of screw trajectory
Pedicle screwOtisBiotechMS-40025
Posterior fixator systemsOtisBiotech
Rod OtisBiotechROD-60140Rigid fixation between screws
Universal handleOtisBiotechSPI-08-01To fix the screws to the rod
Straight socket wrenchOtisBiotechSPI-06-01To fix the screws to the rod
counter torque wrenchOtisBiotechSPI-07-01To fix the screws to the rod
Bulb irrigation syringeHyupsug medicalHS-IR-140Irrigation
Silicone drainSewon medical2205-006To drain the fluid at the surgical site
3.0 metric absorbable sutureEthiconBA1673HMuscle suture
2.0 metric nonabsorbable nylon sutureEthiconW1626TSkin suture
GauzeKingphar KoreaKP120-06
PentobarbitalHanlim pharma645301221Euthanasia
Oscillating sawZimmerHarvest spine
Tower forcepsAesculapBF461RHarvest spine

References

Loading...
$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$ $$\longleftharp{xx}$$, $$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
  1. Greenfield, R. T., Grant, R. E., Bryant, D. Pedicle screw fixation in the management of unstable thoracolumbar spine injuries. Orthop Rev. 21 (6), 701-706 (1992).
  2. Upasani, V. V., et al. Pedicle screw surface coatings improve fixation in nonfusion spinal constructs. Spine. 34 (4), 335-343 (2009).
  3. Halvorson, T. L., Kelley, L. A., Thomas, K. A., Whitecloud, T. S., Cook, S. D. Effects of bone mineral density on pedicle screw fixation. Spine. 19 (21), 2415-2420 (1994).
  4. Weinstein, J. N., Spratt, K. F., Spengler, D., Brick, C., Reid, S. Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine. 13 (9), 1012-1018 (1988).
  5. Fini, M., et al. Biological assessment of the bone-screw interface after insertion of uncoated and hydroxyapatite-coated pedicular screws in the osteopenic sheep. J Biomed Mater Res A. 66 (1), 176-183 (2003).
  6. Kim, D. Y., et al. Evaluation of Titanium-Coated Pedicle Screws: In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model. World Neurosurg. 91, 163-171 (2016).
  7. Upasani, V. V., et al. Pedicle screw surface coatings improve fixation in nonfusion spinal constructs. Spine. 34 (4), 335-343 (2009).
  8. Smit, T. H. The use of a quadrupted as an in vivo model for the study of the spine-biomechanical considrations. Eur Spine J. 11 (2), 137-144 (2002).
  9. Aldini, N. N., et al. Pedicular fixation in the osteoporotic spine: a pilot in vivo study on long-term ovariectomized sheep. J Orthop Res. 20 (6), 1217-1224 (2002).
  10. Fini, M., et al. Biological assessment of the bone-screw interface after insertion of uncoated and hydroxyapatite-coated pedicular screws in the osteopenic sheep. J Biomed Mater Res A. 66 (1), 176-183 (2003).
  11. Branemark, R., Ohrnell, L. O., Skalak, R., Carlsson, L., Branemark, P. I. Biomechanical characterization of osseointegration: an experimental in vivo investigation in the beagle dog. J Orthop Res. 16 (1), 61-69 (1998).
  12. McLain, R. F., Yerby, S. A., Moseley, T. A. Comparative morphometry of L4 vertebrae: comparison of large animal models for the human lumbar spine. Spine. 27 (8), E200-E206 (2002).
  13. Giavaresi, G., et al. In vivo preclinical evaluation of the influence of osteoporosis on the anchorage of different pedicle screw designs. Eur Spine J. 20 (8), 1289-1296 (2011).
  14. Hasegawa, T., et al. Hydroxyapatite-coating of pedicle screws improves resistance against pull-out force in the osteoporotic canine lumbar spine model: a pilot study. Spine J. 5 (3), 239-243 (2005).
  15. Smorgick, Y., et al. Single- versus multilevel fusion for single-level degenerative spondylolisthesis and multilevel lumbar stenosis: four-year results of the spine patient outcomes research trial. Spine. 38 (10), 797-805 (2013).
  16. Busscher, I., Ploegmakers, J. J., Verkerke, G. J., Veldhuizen, A. G. Comparative anatomical dimensions of the complete human and porcine spine. Eur Spine J. 19 (7), 1104-1114 (2010).

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Request permission to reuse the text or figures of this JoVE article

Request Permission

Tags

Pedicle Screw FixationIn Vivo ModelSpinal Surgery ProtocolAnesthesia TechniqueScrew Insertion MethodHarvest ProcedureMicro CT AnalysisBone Volume FractionTitanium Coated Screws

Related Articles