$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
If the spinal column is disturbed, e.g. by cervical dislocation, the spinal cord will split during extrusion. If the spinal cord cannot be extruded, the spinal column may be trimmed slightly at both ends and the extrusion attempt can be repeated. In case the entire spinal cord is needed for further analysis, i.e. consisting of the cervical enlargement as well as the lumbar enlargement, the spinal column should only be trimmed slightly. If only the lumbar enlargement is needed for further analysis, the spinal cord should be trimmed according to the present protocol. The spinal column should be straightened using the fingertips to ease extrusion.
The protocol is applicable to rodents of all ages and is here exemplified by an adult mouse (8 weeks), a mouse pup (5 days) and an adult rat (10 weeks). Depending on animal type and strain, the number of thoracic and lumbar sections may vary9,10,11. Depending on the proteins to be analyzed, adult rodents may be perfused with enzyme-inhibiting solutions prior to euthanasia. If performing an experiment involving one-sided nerve injury, the spinal cord can be split into ipsilateral and contralateral sides using ultra-fine tweezers immediately after extrusion. Further, each side can be split into dorsal and ventral sides. The tissue can then be processed for further analyses, e.g. Western blotting.
Transcardial perfusion-fixation with PFA prior to spinal cord extrusion should be avoided, as this renders the spinal cord non-flexible and prevents spinal cord hydraulic extrusion. Hydraulic spinal cord extrusion will tear off the dorsal roots. For experiments where attached dorsal roots are necessary, laminectomy is recommended. Furthermore, spinal meninges are lost by hydraulic extrusion, which can be avoided by standard laminectomy3.
Hydraulic extrusion of the spinal cord and DRG isolation could also be performed using oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF) instead of ice-cold PBS. The use of ACSF allows preservation of the isolated tissue in a better physiological environment, which is particularly important in case of subsequent electrophysiological recordings12,13. An alternative to ACSF could be PBS containing 1 g/L glucose for generation of primary DRG cultures14.
Hydraulic extrusion of the spinal cord is a significantly faster method than the traditional way of spinal cord isolation by laminectomy, reducing tissue-handling time and therefore decreasing the risk of protein damage. Perfusion with a fixative prior to isolating the spinal cord by laminectomy may reduce the risk of tissue damage during dissection and during final removal of the spinal cord from the spinal column. However, tissue fixation precludes its applicability to analyses such as Western blotting. Hydraulic extrusion yields structurally undamaged tissue3 suitable for a broader range of analyses.
Consistent identification of DRGs may be difficult. However, this is essential for tissue analysis, e.g. following sciatic nerve injury. By numbering the DRGs according to their localization relative to the costae, DRGs can be identified consistently. Staining of spinal cord tissue as well as of DRGs may be optimized by performing the illustrated tissue treatment variations outlined in protocol step 7.