$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
There are many different methods of 3D bioprinting1,2,3. 3D bioprinting is frequently classified by printing technology1, with examples such as inkjet bioprinting, microextrusion bioprinting, laser assisted bioprinting, a combination of methods, or newer approaches. 3D bioprinting can also be classified into scaffold-free or scaffold-dependent methods4. Most methods of 3D bioprinting are scaffold-dependent, where there is a need for biomaterials, e.g. bioinks5 or scaffolds6. However, scaffold-dependent 3D bioprinting face many issues and limitations4,7, such as immunogenicity of scaffolding material, cost of proprietary bioinks, slow speed and toxicity of degradation products.
Scaffold-free cardiac tissue engineering using spheroids has been attempted8, with the potential to overcome these disadvantages of scaffold-dependent tissue engineering. However, as acknowledged by the authors in that paper, it had been difficult to robustly handle and position spheroids in fixed locations, in the process of biofabrication. The concomitant use of 3D bioprinting and spheroid-based tissue engineering has the potential to overcome these difficulties. In this protocol, we describe 3D bioprinting of cardiac tissue without other biomaterials, using only cells in the form of spheroids.
Scaffold-free spheroid-based 3D bioprinters9 have the ability to pick up individual spheroids using vacuum suction and position them on a needle array. The concept of positioning spheroids on a needle array in 3D bioprinting, is inspired from the use of needle arrays (known as "kenzan") in the ancient Japanese art of flower arrangement, ikebana. This system allows spheroids to be precisely positioned in any configuration and results in the individual spheroids fusing together over a short period to create a 3D bioprinted tissue. This method thus allows spheroids to be manipulated with ease, with potential implications for the future of scaffold-free organ biofabrication.