Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy (CTE) has recently been recognized as a distinct neurodegenerative disorder, separate from other tauopathies such as Alzheimer's disease1. Unlike Alzheimer's disease and other common tauopathies-whose most important risk factors are advancing age and a family history of dementia, CTE, as indicated by its name, implies a close association with a history of brain trauma, most likely seen in contact sports athletes, such as boxers and football players, as well as in military veterans2,3,4,5. It is thought to be initiated by repeated concussive and subconcussive blows to the head. Patients may present symptoms and signs such as cognitive deficits, mood and behavior changes, and movement dysfunction, which overlap significantly with Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, Lewy body dementia, and Parkinson's disease6. In contrast, post-mortem examinations of brain tissue reveal a distinct pattern of hyperphosphorylated tau accumulation surrounding small blood vessels at the depths of the cortical sulci, a pathognomonic feature not observed in the other degenerative conditions7. However, so far, very little is known about the pathogenesis leading to disease manifestation. This is in large part due to the lack of a faithful animal model - only recently have rodent models been generated5,8. These model organisms have the disadvantages of cost-intensive care and a relatively long life span, which are not well-suited for neurodegenerative disease studies.
Compared to mammalian counterparts, invertebrate animals such as Drosophila are an excellent alternative, with their cost-effective maintenance, extensive tools for dissecting genetic determinants, and relatively short lifespan9. Remarkably, fly and human brains share evolutionarily conserved molecular and cellular pathways, as well as anatomical similarities10,11,12. Two ingenious Drosophila models to study traumatic brain injury have been reported previously13,14. The first "High Impact Trauma" (HIT) device designed by Katzenberger and colleagues contained free-moving flies in a plastic vial that was tied to the free end of a metal spring13,15. When the plastic vial was tilted upright and released, it hit a polyurethane pad and imparted trauma to the flies as they bounced to the vial wall and rebounded. In contrast, Barekat and colleagues designed a different delivery method using the Omni Bead Ruptor-24 homogenizer platform14. Flies were incapacitated with CO2 and placed in a 2 mL screwcap tube that was secured to the homogenizer and subjected to preprogrammed shaking conditions. One benefit of using the tissue homogenizer system is that the experimenter could modulate the intensity of injury, duration of injury, and number of injury bouts. However, both regimes suffer the same drawback: primary injuries to the head are randomly inflicted in terms of impact location and strength. In addition, both methods resulted in considerable mortality, caused by inevitable collateral damage to other parts of the body and internal organs. Here, we describe a novel method to induce mTBI in fruit flies. Our apparatus consists of a gas-propelled ballistic impactor. Compared to the existing Drosophila models14,15, our method has the unique advantage of delivering measurable impact, directed only at the free-moving fly head, thus allowing for the accurate control of various factors, such as impact severity, the time interval between impacts, and the total number of impacts sustained.