This protocol describes the "Drosophila Island Assay" macro that quantitatively assesses Drosophila motor behavior during the island assay. The macro accurately counts the flies on the platform over time, making the island assay highly sensitive and suitable for quantitative high-throughput evaluation of locomotor defects. The methodology allows for the comparison of any condition, with flies grown under different genetic and/or environmental conditions, including drug exposure. This readout is thus particularly useful as discovery tool when performing large genetic or pharmaceutical screens, when studying Drosophila models of movement disorders and other neurological diseases, or when examining locomotion or flight behavior.
The island assay protocol presented in this manuscript provides advantages over existing/alternative methods. For example, video-tracking locomotion is much more time-consuming and less suitable for testing large sample sizes. The island assay is a high-throughput screening tool, and, in this sense, is comparable to the rapid interactive negative geotaxis (RING) assay16. The difference between the two is that the island assays allows for the detection of a broader range of locomotor problems; the inability of flies to leave the platform can be caused by defects in flight, jumping, or walking behavior caused by wing (muscle/neuronal) and/or leg (muscle/neuronal) defects. On the other hand, the RING assay assesses defects in climbing/walking behavior caused by leg (muscle/neuronal) defects. In case users are interested in multiple behavioral readouts, the island assay can also easily be combined with other assays, such as the RING assay. In addition, lasers required for optogenetics can easily be installed in the island assay box, and the setup is so simple that it can easily be moved to a room where temperature and light can be controlled.
To ensure the success and reproducibility of the island assay described here, several recommendations should be followed. Aliquot and transfer the flies to the experimental test vials at least one day before the experiment to avoid the effects of CO2 or cold anesthesia. Do not overcrowd the experimental vials (use 10 - 15 flies per vial; it is best to always place the same number of flies per vial). Keep the flies on fresh food at all times. If not yet familiar with conducting the assay, practice throwing flies onto the platform to maximize the yield. Also practice quickly retracting the hand right afterwards, as it interferes with the data analysis (image analysis and fly counting start only after the hand is out of the picture). Keep the environmental and experimental conditions identical in experiments that need to be compared (e.g., controls versus mutants or a genotype tested at different ages). Always perform the experiments at the same time of the day and maintain the vials under controlled temperature and humidity conditions. For statistical power, test at least three technical replicates per biological replicate.
To ensure the successful performance of the macro described here, webcam and image settings must be adjusted to achieve maximal contrast: flies appearing as black objects on a white platform. When the number of flies is not properly counted by the macro, adjust the contrast settings, check whether the ROI is properly selected, and ensure that the size of the flies on the platform is above the specified minimum fly size setting (see step 8.3 of this protocol). The settings only need to be defined once. They are applicable to all experiments, as long as the distance between the webcam and the platform is not changed. The Circularity_min and max settings define the circularity of the particles (particles = counted flies) that will be taken into account for the analysis (flies = counted objects). 1 represents a perfect circle, and 0 represents a line17. Since the flies always present a certain degree of circularity (a fly cannot appear as a straight line), the "Circularity_max" setting is set at 1 and the "Circularity_min" setting is set at 0.4. It is unlikely that the user needs to adjust these settings.
The macro occasionally makes counting mistakes when a fly is located close to the border of the platform. This can occur if the flies cannot fly but walk in and out of the user-defined ROI. In most cases, reselecting the ROI (fitting it as much as possible to the platform) can easily solve this issue. However, the "Island Assay Analysis" script is able to detect and correct improper data counts caused by flies walking in and out of the ROI relatively well. Although the resolution of the webcam presented here is high enough to discriminate flies in close proximity fairly well, we have implemented additional algorithms in the image processing procedure of the "Drosophila Island Assay" macro, such as the watershed and erode function17. These facilitate the proper delineation of flies that are in close proximity on the platform. In addition, the macro is unable to distinguish between flies that jumped from the platform or flew away from it. Nonetheless, it is generally observed that healthy young fly strains fly away immediately when dropped onto the platform, whereas older flies and flies with locomotor deficits remain longer on the platform and will eventually jump or fall off the platform. Despite these limitations, the assay and analysis provide a very accurate measure of locomotor behavior.
To ensure the successful performance of the "Island Assay Analysis" script, the user has to make sure to enter the correct paths for the input and output files in the script rows indicated in the protocol and to provide the data in the correct folder format (as indicated in Figure 2). If the user finds the criteria used to filter out unreliable experimental data too stringent (row 68: the first value in the "Count" column is less than or equal to 5; row 71: the first value in the "Count" column is higher than the total number of flies thrown on the platform +3), turn off these filter settings by adding a # in front of the text in rows 68 and 71 in the "Island Assay Analysis" script. In this case, all datasets will be included in the analysis. Alternatively, filter settings can be changed by adjusting the values in rows 68 and 71 according to user needs. Possible artifacts in the count values in the "results.txt" generated by the "Drosophila Island Assay" macro can also be manually adjusted, and the script can be re-run on the adjusted data. When the user is interested in processing more than 10 fps, or more than 10 s of data, the number of frames processed by the "Island Assay Analysis" script should be adjusted. The statistical analysis can also be replaced by user-defined alternatives.
A folder called "Examples Island Assay," containing examples with image time-series obtained using the island assay, can be found at the following website: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4309652.v1. Download the “Examples Island Assay” folder and follow the steps described in this protocol to quickly become familiarized with the structure of file storage, the processing of the images with the “Drosophila Island assay” macro, and the “Island Assay Analysis” script.
The island assay, in combination with the developed macro and analysis script, can be used to evaluate and quantify the aberrant movement behavior of a Drosophila model of Ataxia-Telangiectasia. Since the assay can be efficiently applied to various ages, it is well suited to analyzing the potentially progressive nature of phenotypes.
In summary, the island assay, in combination with the "Drosophila Island Assay" macro and the "Island Assay Analysis" script, is a cost-effective, reliable, and highly efficient assay to objectively analyze and quantify locomotor defects of Drosophila models of movement disorders in a high-throughput manner.