$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Significance with Respect to Existing Methods:
In this protocol, we described a method to generate different humanized microenvironments in mice and to visualize their architecture via two-photon microscopy and histology. The representative data provided shows the feasibility of the approach, using different stromal cells to engineer humanized tissues. The protocol has specific applications to the study of human hematopoietic cells and bone marrow niche-derived cells in normal and pathological conditions. These applications include the study of clonal evolution, drug screening, and crosstalk between human HSCs and stromal components. In the emerging field of tissue engineering, several alternative approaches have been proposed. Approaches of note include the development of 3D humanized BM structures in vitro55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62,63 and the orthotopic graft of humanized BM scaffolds in mice64. Our approach has the advantage of combining both the complexity of the in vivo system with the easy anatomical accessibility of the humanized tissue graft.
Modifications and Troubleshooting:
A source of variability in this protocol can be found in the selection of cells used to seed the scaffolds. In our work, we used BM-derived hMSCs. However, mesenchymal cells can be obtained from several tissues, which may show distinctive properties depending upon the origin. Therefore, the use of hMSCs derived from different organs can be considered. However, their ability to form bone tissue in vivo should be tested prior to use in this protocol.This protocol uses a commercially available human endothelial cell source (i.e., E4ORF1-transduced HUVEC). Recently, the use of organ-specific endothelial cells for different purposes has been reported65,66. Furthermore, the use of primary hECs derived from the BM could represent an interesting improvement to the protocol. Therefore, the use of different sources of endothelial cells may produce different in vivo outcomes.
We used NSG immunocompromised recipient mice to favor the implantation of humanized scaffolds and to avoid tissue rejection. We do not exclude the possibility of using this protocol to engineer ectopic bone marrow tissues in other mouse strains. Indeed, rhBMP-2 can induce bone formation in different mammalian models47,48,49,50,52. However, differences in cell viability and long-term transplantation are likely to be observed using different strains/models.
The timing of scaffold recovery can also be flexible, depending upon the final purpose of the experiment. In the presented protocol, we recover samples at 8 - 12 weeks after implantation to assess long-term hematopoietic engraftment. To study early steps of the human BM niche formation (e.g., osteochondral tissue formation47 or vascular development), different time points can be chosen.
The live-imaging technique we described in this protocol is indicated for short-term imaging of explants. The use of an equilibrated chamber for maintaining physiological temperature, oxygen tension, and CO2 concentration should be considered in cases of long-term imaging, such as to study motility behaviors.
Critical Steps within the Protocol:
Among the challenges related to the protocol, we would highlight the technical skills required for some steps. Mesenchymal and endothelial cells should be used at low cell passage numbers; otherwise, they will not be able to support human hematopoietic cell engraftment in vivo or to participate in de novo vasculature and bone formation in vivo. We recommend the use of hMSCs and hECs at passages 1 - 5. Scaffold preparation and cell-seeding steps require basic cell-culture skills and knowledge of the properties of the specific cells used in the procedure. The surgery protocol is quite straightforward but requires some practice. Maintenance of an aseptic environment to avoid contamination of the implanted scaffolds in immunodeficient mice is crucial to ensure the success of the experiment. Sample explant and live imaging require surgical practice (especially for the use of the microdrill) and knowledge of the microscope system. Finally, sample processing and histology require basic knowledge of the techniques to be used.
Limitations of the Technique:
The approach we describe allows for the visualization of live human hematopoietic cells seeding a humanized bone marrow microenvironment, with human endothelial cells forming vascular structures and mesenchymal cells forming bone/bone marrow space. As the tissue is formed in vivo, the final engineered scaffold will still be chimeric (human and murine). This issue should be taken into account, as the chimeric tissue may not fully mimic human bone marrow complexity and environment.
The scaffolds implanted have a limited size (we tried a maximum of 6.6 x 7.5 x 7 mm), and therefore, they are able to host a limited number of cells for xenotransplantation. The absolute number of recovered cells will also be limited; thus, the number of implanted scaffolds should be calculated as a function of the number of cells required for the experiment.
The imaging application we described is particularly useful for observing large areas of live tissue at depths of 150-200 µm from the surface without disrupting the architecture and damaging the cells. Therefore, it does not allow for the visualization of the whole scaffold. If a complete scan of the tissue is required, standard immunofluorescence approaches would be more appropriate.
Future Applications:
The future direction of this bioengineered model would be to increase the complexity of the human components in the tissue. The knowledge and characterization of the human BM niche has progressed in recent years67, and the described protocol could be an interesting platform to study the function of these new cellular components and soluble factors, as well as their role in supporting normal/malignant HSCs.
Furthermore, the imaging technique provides the potential for intravital imaging of the scaffolds in longitudinal studies, which would require technical improvements in imaging the scaffolds in live, anesthetized mice, with post-surgery recovery. This approach would require additional steps and is currently under investigation in the laboratory.