Ameroid constrictors have been used extensively to create animal models of chronic myocardial ischemia, chronic myocardial infarction, and heart failure5,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,17,18,19,22. Although these models can be created through the use of stents, hydraulic occluders, or fixed stenosis occluders, the prevalence of ameroid use in scientific literature allows researchers to more accurately compare the results of their work with previously published studies5,6,7,9,10,11,12,13,15,16,17,18,19,22. Another advantage of using the ameroid constrictor is that the procedure is relatively straightforward and can be performed successfully by anyone with reasonable surgical skills, and requires no specialized instruments. The other aforementioned methods require greater technical skills and, in the case of the hydraulic occluder, requires intense post-operative monitoring due to the externalized device6,13.
The main limitation of using the ameroid constrictor is the variability in the rate of occlusion9,13. In general, most studies using the ameroid constrictor have found the rate of stenosis to be highest in the first two weeks and then gradually taper off until complete occlusion occurs23,24. Ex vivo studies directly measuring the closure rate of the ameroid lumen have confirmed that the greatest reduction in lumen diameter occurs in the first two weeks and slows thereafter25,26. However, these same studies have also showed that surrounding glucose and protein concentrations can affect the rate and completeness of the ameroid closure, thereby suggesting that in vivo conditions are most likely responsible for the variability in ameroid occlusion rates25,26. Other investigators have suggested that mechanical trauma, inflammation, fibrosis, and thrombus formation caused by the ameroid placement procedure itself may contribute to this variability5,6,25. The latter scenario is most likely the reason for the premature deaths and heart failures observed in this study. It cannot be stressed enough the importance of doing delicate, yet adequate, artery dissection on either side of the ameroid to prevent kinking of the vessel.
Proper placement of the ameroid constrictor is critical to develop an ischemic area of the heart that is large enough to treat but not so large that it results in death. Placing the ameroid constrictor on the LCX before the first obtuse marginal branch appears to work best in Yorkshire pigs. As reported elsewhere, this resulted in an ischemic area of around 25-30% of the left ventricle6. Placing the ameroid any lower resulted in an ischemic area that was inadequate for the specific treatment that was being investigated in this study.
Arrhythmias occurring during the surgical procedure are rare. Administering oral amiodarone post-operation through the end of the study, may prevent arrhythmias during the 2 to 3 weeks post-operation, when the ameroid is closing off. Additionally, caretaking and medical staff should be especially vigilant in noting any coughing during this time, which could be an early sign of pulmonary edema/heart failure.
Over the years, the design of the ameroid constrictor has been improved upon. Ameroids are currently available in numerous sizes allowing the surgeon to select an ameroid that matches the diameter of the vessel to be occluded. The outer ring of the ameroid is available in stainless steel, titanium, or plastic. This is especially important when evaluating the affected hearts using MRI. All metal will cause an artifact on the MRI images. Titanium ameroids cause less of an artifact than stainless steel, while plastic leaves none at all. MRI images showing the difference between a titanium ameroid and a plastic ameroid are shown in Figure 2 and Figure 3, respectively. The artifact on the right side of the heart in Figure 2 is caused by the titanium ring encasing the ameroid. Until recently, the containment ring on the plastic ameroid was too bulky to place around a coronary artery without kinking the vessel. The ameroid constrictor used in this study (see Table of Materials) is a much more streamlined version, which has the same outer diameter as the metal ameroids.