A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Laser Microirradiation to Study In Vivo Cellular Responses to Simple and Complex DNA Damage

10.1K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/56213

⸱

January 31st, 2018

 ,  ,  ,  ,  ,  , 

* These authors contributed equally

In This Article

Summary

The goal of this protocol is to describe how to use laser microirradiation to induce different types of DNA damage, including relatively simple strand breaks and complex damage, to study DNA damage signaling and repair factor assembly at damage sites in vivo.

Abstract

DNA damage induces specific signaling and repair responses in the cell, which is critical for protection of genome integrity. Laser microirradiation became a valuable experimental tool to investigate the DNA damage response (DDR) in vivo. It allows real-time high-resolution single-cell analysis of macromolecular dynamics in response to laser-induced damage confined to a submicrometer region in the cell nucleus. However, various laser conditions have been used without appreciation of differences in the types of damage induced. As a result, the nature of the damage is often not well characterized or controlled, causing apparent inconsistencies in the recruitment or modification profiles. We demonstrated that different irradiation conditions (i.e., different wavelengths as well as different input powers (irradiances) of a femtosecond (fs) near-infrared (NIR) laser) induced distinct DDR and repair protein assemblies. This reflects the type of DNA damage produced. This protocol describes how titration of laser input power allows induction of different amounts and complexities of DNA damage, which can easily be monitored by detection of base and crosslinking damages, differential poly (ADP-ribose) (PAR) signaling, and pathway-specific repair factor assemblies at damage sites. Once the damage conditions are determined, it is possible to investigate the effects of different damage complexity and differential damage signaling as well as depletion of upstream factor(s) on any factor of interest.

Introduction

In Vivo DNA Damage Signaling is Not Well Understood
In vivo, DNA is complexed with histones and other factors to form chromatin fibers. Regulation of chromatin structure is of paramount importance for DNA metabolism. For example, the histone variant H2AX is phosphorylated by ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and other kinases following double-strand breaks (DSB) induction, and is important for DSB damage signal amplification as well as providing a docking site for other factors. Spreading of damage signaling and repair pathway choice appear to be critically influenced by local chromatin structure at damage sites

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Basic Cell Preparation

Note: This step is for standard immunofluorescence detection of the endogenous protein recruitment or modification, and for the use of a cell line stably expressing a fluorescently tagged recombinant protein. For example, Potorustridactylus (PtK2) marsupial kidney epithelial cells stably expressing EGFP-53BP11220-1711 or TRF2-YFP were used in our previous study (Figure 1)32. In the former case, the focus forming region of 53BP1 (amino acid 1220-1711) that contains the oligomerization domain, the Tudor domain, and the ubiquitylation-dependent re....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

Using PtK2 cells stably expressing EGFP-53BP11220-1711 or TRF2-YFP, laser input power titration was carried out to determine the optimal condition for their recruitment (Figure 1)32.

At high input-power laser damage sites, the significant clustering of CPD (crosslinking damage typically generated by ultraviolet (UV) damage) as well as GFP-NTH1 DNA glycosylase that specifically recognizes base damage were observed. In addition, hi.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The advantages of using laser microirradiation for DDR research are:

1. It is feasible to induce different types and amounts of DNA damage from simple strand breaks to complex DNA damage, and to detect different repair factors at the DNA damage sites by adjusting the laser irradiation parameters. It is also possible to inflict damage multiple times in the same cell nucleus in order to evaluate trans effects (as in Figure 3).

2........

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

We thank Dr. Akira Yasui at Tohoku University, Japan for the GFP-NTH1 expression plasmid, and Dr. Eros Lazzerini Denchi at the Scripps Research Institute, La Jolla, California for the TRF2-YFP and EGFP-53BP11220-1711 expression plasmids. This work was supported by the Air Force Office of Scientific Research (FA9550-04-1-0101) and the Beckman Laser Institute Inc. Foundation (to M.W.B), the Ford Foundation Fellowship from the National Academy of Sciences (to B.A.S), and NSF MCB-1615701 and CRCC CRR-17-426665 (to K. Y.).

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Ti:Sapphire NIR pulsed femtosecond laser Mira-900Coherent Inc.Mira 900
Inverted microscope Carl ZeissAxiovert 200M
63X/1.4 NA objectiveZeissAPOCHROMAT Ph3 
Compact Rotation Stage Newport CorpPR50PP
Temperature ControllerWarnerTC-344B
Heating SystemIbidi 10918
Gas Incubation SystemIbidi 11920
Laser Power and Energy Meter (RoHS)CoherentFieldMaxII-TOP 
ORCA-R2 Digital CCD CameraHamamatsuC10600
LSM 510 META Laser Scanning MicroscopesCarl Zeiss
100X/1.3 NA Zeiss Plan APOCarl Zeiss
35mm Gridded Dishes MatTekP35G-1.5-14-CGRD-D
PtK2 kidney epithelial cellsATCCCCL 56 
HeLa cellsATCCCCL-2
DMEMLife Technologies11885-092
CO2-Independent Medium Life Technologies18045-088
Advanced MEM Life Technologies12492-013supplemented with L-Glutamine, 4% FBS
penicillin/streptomycinFisher Scientific15140122
L-GlutamineFisher Scientific25030081
FBSOmega ScientificFB-02
Thymidine  SIGMAT9250
serum free media     (Opti-MEM I Reduced Serum Media)Fisher Scientific11058021
Anti-Cycolbutance pyrimidine dimer (CPD) (mouse)Kamiya Biomedical CompanyMC-062
Anti-XRCC1 (mouse )Gene Tex IncGTX72311
Anti-53BP1 (rabbit)Santa Cruz Biotechsc-22760
Anti-CtIP (rabbit)Abcamab70163
Anti-PAR polymers (mouse)Enzo Life SciencesBML-SA216-0100
Anti-PAR (rabbit)Trevigen4336-BPC-100
Anti-TRF2 (mouse)Novus Biological NB100-56506
Anti 6-4PP (mouse)Kamiya Biomedical
Anti-Rad21 (Rabbit)                     (for cohesin detection)generated in Yokomori (KY) lab
Anti-Rad51 (Rabbit)Santa Cruz BiotechnologySC-8349
Anti-Ku70 (mouse) Novus BiologicalsNB100-102
8-oxiguanine Trevigen, Inc.
Anti-PARP1  (Rabbit)                    generated in KY labref 43
 Anti-hCAPG (Rabbit)                    (for condensin detection)generated in KY labref 42
Cy3 AffiniPure Donkey Anti-Rabbit IgG Jackson ImmunoResearch Inc711-165-152
Donkey Anti-Mouse Alexa Fluor 488 IgGThermo Fisher ScientificA-21202
HiPerFect siRNA Transfection ReagentQiagen301705
Lipofectamine 2000 Transfection ReagentThermo Fisher Scientific11668019
GFP-SMC1 stable cell line    generated in KY labref 49 
GFP-NEIL2 stable cell linegenerated in KY labref 54
GFP-NTH1 stable cell linegenerated in KY labref 32
GFP-SMC1 plasmidgenerated in KY lab
GFP-Ku plasmidgenerated in KY lab
Anti-MDC1 (rabbit) Novus BiologicalsNB100–395
Anti-gH2AX (rabbit) Millipore07–164
EGFP-53BP1(1220-1711) PtK2 stable cell linegenerated in Berns labref 32
TRF2-YFP PtK2 stable cell linegenerated in Berns labref 32
DMSOSigmaD2650-100ML
PARG inhibitorTrevigen4680-096-03
DNA–PKcs inhibitor  NU7026 SigmaN1537
ATM inhibitor KU55933 Calbiochem118500
Olaparib Apexbio TechnologyA4154
Paraformaldehyde ELECTRON MICROSCOPY SCIENC MS100503-916 (EA)
Quantity One 1-D Analysis Software Version 4.6.9Bio-RadSOFT-LIT-70-9600-Q1-469PC image analysis program
Excelmicrosoftspreadsheet program
Triton X100Fisher ScientificBP151-500detergent
Dulbecco's phosphate-buffered saline (DPBS) 10X without calcium and magnesiumFisher Scientific14200166dilute to 1X 

References

  1. Altmeyer, M., Lukas, J. To spread or not to spread--chromatin modifications in response to DNA damage. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 23 (2), 156-165 (2013).
  2. Ciccia, A., Elledge, S. J. The DNA damage response: making it safe to play with knives. Mol. Cell. 4....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

DNA Damage ResponseDouble Strand BreakBase DamagePoly ADP RibosylationConfocal MicroscopyFluorescent Protein TaggingCell Cycle SynchronizationPARP InhibitionLive Cell Imaging