A subscription to JoVE is required to view this content. Sign in or start your free trial.

Method Article

Evaluating In Vitro DNA Damage Using Comet Assay

38.8K views

⸱

DOI:

10.3791/56450

⸱

October 11th, 2017

 ,  , 

In This Article

Summary

The comet assay is an efficient method to detect DNA damage including single and double-stranded DNA breaks. We describe alkaline and neutral comet assays to measure DNA damage in cancer cells to evaluate the therapeutic effect of chemotherapy.

Abstract

DNA damage is a common phenomenon for each cell during its lifespan, and is defined as an alteration of the chemical structure of genomic DNA. Cancer therapies, such as radio- and chemotherapy, introduce enormous amount of additional DNA damage, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis to limit cancer progression. Quantitative assessment of DNA damage during experimental cancer therapy is a key step to justify the effectiveness of a genotoxic agent. In this study, we focus on a single cell electrophoresis assay, also known as the comet assay, which can quantify single and double-strand DNA breaks in vitro. The comet assay is a DNA damage quantification method that is efficient and easy to perform, and has low time/budget demands and high reproducibility. Here, we highlight the utility of the comet assay for a preclinical study by evaluating the genotoxic effect of olaparib/temozolomide combination therapy to U251 glioma cells.

Introduction

The comet assay was first developed by Ostling and Johanson in 1984 by demonstrating the migration of DNA fragments from nuclei under a neutral condition1. The technique was later developed by Singh et al., showing that an alkaline condition substantially increased the specificity and reproducibility of the assay2. Since then, the neutral comet assay is mostly used to detect double-stranded DNA breaks, whereas the alkaline comet assay is more sensitive for smaller amounts of DNA damage, including single and double strand DNA breaks, alkali-labile sites, DNA-DNA or DNA-protein cross-linking, and DNA single-strand....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Protocol

1. Prepare Reagents

  1. 1x PBS
    1. Dilute 100 mL 10x PBS with 900 mL dH2O and adjust the pH to 7.4 using a pH meter. Store at room temperature.
  2. Lysis solution (LS)
    1. Prepare 2.5 M NaCl, 100 mM disodium EDTA, 10 mM Tris base, and 200 mM NaOH in 900 mL dH2O; it commonly takes about 20 min to allow the mixture to fully dissolve. Adjust the pH to 10 using a pH meter. Add 1% sodium lauryl sarcosinate and 1% Triton X-100, and adjust the final volume to 1,000 mL. Cool to 4 °C for at least 30 min before use.
  3. Alkaline electrophoresis solutio....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Results

The present protocol describes a step-by-step workflow for the comet assay execution and data analysis (Figure 1). Results from the alkaline and neutral comet assays showed that the comet tail of doxorubicin-treated U251 cells (1 µM, 20 h) was longer and had higher DNA intensity, suggesting a substantial accumulation of fragmented DNA due to chemotherapy (Figure 2).

Qua.......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Discussion

The comet assay is an efficient tool to measure single and double-strand DNA breaks at the cellular level. The assay has been widely applied as a "golden standard" in studies regarding genotoxicity and biomonitoring13, ranging from base lesions, DNA crosslinks, drug development, and alkali sensitive sites. In the present study, we showed two distinct step-by-step protocols for alkaline and neutral comet assays, respectively. Combining single cell electrophoresis, fluorescent microscopy, and image .......

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Disclosures

The authors have nothing to disclose.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Intramural Research Program of the NIH, NCI, and CCR. All authors received Intramural Research Grant from NIH, NCI, and CCR.

....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Materials

List of materials used in this article
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Reagents
10x PBS(Ca++, Mg++ free)TEKnovaP0196
NaClSigmaS5886
EDTATEKnovaE0308
Trizma baseSigmaT1503
NaOHSigma72068
Sodium lauryl sarcosinateSigmaL7414
Triton X-100Sigma93443
Sodium acetateSigma32318
Glacial acetic acidSigma695092
Ammonium acetateSigmaA1542
SYBR GreenInvitrogenS33102
Low melting point agaroseInvitrogen16520
AgaroseInvitrogen16500
95% ethanolWARNER-GRAHAM#64-17-5
TrypsinGIBICO25300-054
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Consumables
Glass tissue slidesELECTRON MICROSCOPY SCIENCES63422-11
KimwipesKIMberly-Clark
1.5 mL Microcentrifuge TubesDENVILLE
Pipette TipsSHARP
NameCompanyCatalog NumberComments
Equipments
MicrowaveAvanti
WaterbathPRECISION
Horizontal electrophoresis chamberTREVIGENCometassay ES II
Power supplyBio-Rad
IncubatorQuincy LabModel 12-140E
Fluorescent microscopeZeissLSM700
MicropipettorEppendorf

References

  1. Ostling, O., Johanson, K. J. Microelectrophoretic study of radiation-induced DNA damages in individual mammalian cells. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 123 (1), 291-298 (1984).
  2. Singh, N. P., McCoy, M. T., Tice, R. R., Schneider, E. L. ....

Access restricted. Please log in or start a trial to view this content.

Reprints and Permissions

Explore More Articles

Single Cell ElectrophoresisAlkaline CometNeutral CometU251 Glioma CellsOlaparib TemozolomideFluorescent MicroscopyImage AnalysisAgarose Slide Coating