$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Cardiac disease is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide1,2. The lack of effective therapeutic strategies for life-threatening heart conditions including myocardial infarction and heart failure attracts intensive exploration of underlying pathomechanisms and identification of novel therapeutic options3. For these scientific explorations, cardiac-specific gene manipulation is widely used4,5. Cardiac gene manipulation can be achieved by genome editing using the powerful transcription activator-like effector nuclease (TALEN) and clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated protein 9 (Cas9) tools, or by delivery of ectopic genetic materials (e.g., virus vectors carrying genes encoding proteins of interest)6. Though genome editing allows precise and spatiotemporal genome modifications in living mice, it is still a time-consuming and labor-intensive practice6. Alternatively, cardiac-specific gene manipulation by virus vector or small interfering RNA (siRNA) complex delivery are routinely performed6.
Virus vector delivery to the adult mouse heart is achieved by roughly two strategies: systemic or local injection. Systemic injection of cardiotropic serotype of AAVs such as AAV9 is noninvasive for cardiac specific gene manipulation7. However, this method requires a relatively high amount of vector necessary for efficient transduction and gene expression, and may result in significant transduction of nontarget organs such as the muscle and liver7. Local virus injection is achieved by intramyocardial injection or intracoronary delivery7. Intracoronary delivery leads to a more even distribution of virus within the heart compared to intramyocardial injection. However, the disadvantages of this technique are the rapid wash out of viral vectors to the systemic circulation and transduction in nontarget organs8, and its requirement of devices for pressure measurement during the operation. By contrast, intramyocardial injection enables better virus retention in the myocardium as well as site specific delivery, but it fails to evenly distribute viral vector7. For small animals, intracoronary delivery is technically difficult to perform, while systemic AAV9 injection and intramyocardial injection are more commonly practiced4,5,7. Though systemic injection is easy to perform, conventional intramyocardial injection requires mechanical ventilation and thoracotomy, causes extensive tissue damage, and is time-consuming.
In this report, we described an easy, time-saving, and highly efficient method for intramyocardial injection. Adenovirus encoding luciferase and VDR, or shRNA targeting VDR, was injected to manipulate cardiac gene expression. Once mastered, this method can be used for gene manipulation, as well as injection of cells or other materials in the mouse heart.