Obesity and metabolic syndrome (MetS) have become a growing problem for public health and clinical practice, given their increased prevalence due to the rise of sedentary lifestyles and unhealthy eating habits1. There are several definitions of MetS, but most of them describe it as a cluster of cardiovascular and metabolic alterations such as abdominal obesity, reduced HDL and elevated LDL cholesterol, elevated triglycerides, glucose intolerance, and hypertension2,3,4. Diagnosis requires that three out of these five criteria are present.
Owing to animal models, basic research has been able to investigate the mechanisms underlying pathological processes such as MetS. Several animal models have been used, but it is of crucial importance that the model of choice reproduces the main clinical manifestations of the human pathology (Figure 1). With this aim, animal models considered similar to humans, mainly canine and swine, have been developed (see Verkest5 and Zhang & Lerman6 for review). However, canine models do not show all the components of MetS, given that the development of atherosclerosis or hyperglycemia in dogs by means of the diet is questionable5. Swine models present the most anatomical and physiological similarity with humans, and thus offer significant predictive power for elucidating the mechanisms underlying MetS, but their maintenance and the complexity of the experimental procedures make the use of this model very labor intensive and costly6.
On the other hand, rodent models (mouse and rat), diet-induced spontaneous and transgenic, have been extensively used in the literature for the study of obesity, hypertension, and MetS, and its pathological consequences in different organs and systems (see Wong et al.7 for review). Although the use of these models is more affordable than canine or swine, they have important drawbacks. Indeed, depending on the strain, animals develop some components of MetS, whereas others such as hypertension, hyperglycemia, and hyperinsulinemia are absent7. Furthermore, one of the main components of MetS, obesity, in some genetically modified strains, does not only depend on factors associated with the diet, rather it has been shown that some animals become obese with normal or even reduced food intake8. Finally, mice and rats show a natural deficiency in cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) and use HDL as the major means of cholesterol transport, which makes them relatively resistant to the development of atherosclerosis. This is an important difference in lipid metabolism with humans, who express CETP and transport their cholesterol mainly in LDL9.
Conversely, the laboratory rabbit represents an intermediate stage between the larger animal and rodent experimental models. Thus, the rabbit can be easily submitted to different types of protocols with minimal requirements of personnel and maintenance, being more easily handled in experimental procedures than larger animal models. Furthermore, it has been reported that rabbits fed with a high-fat diet have similar hemodynamic and neurohumoral changes as obese humans8,10,11. Of note, regarding lipid metabolism, the rabbit has abundant CETP in plasma and their lipoprotein profile is LDL-rich12, which is also similar to humans. Additionally, rabbits develop hyperlipidemia quite rapidly given that, as herbivores, they are very sensitive to dietary fat13.

Figure 1: Comparison of MetS animal models. See Verkest5, Zhang and Lerman6, and Wong et al.7 for review. "
" indicates an advantage and "
" indicates a disadvantage. *controversial, depends on the study, **as pointed out by Carroll et al.8, some genetically modified strains become obese independently of food intake. CEPT: cholesteryl ester transfer protein. GTT: glucose tolerance test. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
In order to elucidate the basic mechanisms underlying the pathological remodeling produced by MetS in the different organs and systems, and to gain understanding of this complex pathology, the choice of an experimental model that reproduces the main components of human MetS is essential. The rabbit can provide many advantages given its similarity with human physiology and the affordability of use in chronic protocols and measurements. In this line, few diet-induced rabbit models using high-fat and high-sucrose diet have been used14,15,16,17,18,19 (Table 1), and a characterization of the different components of MetS is of great importance when relating a phenotype with organ remodeling. Thus, this article's main objective is to describe the methods to develop a model of diet-induced MetS in rabbits that allows the study of its pathophysiology and impact in organ remodeling.
| Study | Diet | Duration | Breed | MetS components |
| Ob | HT | HG | Dl |
| Yin et al. (2002)14 | · 10% fat | 24 weeks | · Male NZW |  | - |  |  |
| · 37% sucrose | · 2 kg |
| Zhao et al. (2007)15 | · 10% fat | 36 weeks | · Male JW |  |  |  |  |
| · 30% sucrose | · 16 weeks |
| Helfestein et al. (2011)16 | · 10% fat | 24 weeks | · Male NZW |  | - |  |  |
| · 40% sucrose | · 12 weeks |
| · 0.5-0.1 cholesterol | |
| Ning et al. (2015)17 | · 10% fat | 8-16 weeks | · Male WHHL |  | - |  |  |
| · 30% fructose* | · 12 weeks |
| Liu et al. (2016)18 | · 10% fat | 48 weeks | · Male NZW |  | - |  |  |
| · 30% sucrose | · 12 weeks |
| Arias-Mutis et al. (2017)19 | · 15% fat | 28 weeks | · Male NZW |  |  |  |  |
Table 1: Diet-induced MetS rabbit models using high-fat, high-sucrose diet. The symbol "
" indicates absence, "
" presence, and "-" not evaluated. *restricted. WHHL, Watanabe heritable hiperlipidemic rabbits. JW, Japanese white rabbits. Ob, obesity. HT, hypertension. HG, hyperglycemia. Dl, dyslipidemia.