$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Sensorineural hearing loss and vestibular dysfunction affect a substantial number of patients and are closely associated with inner ear disorders. Delivery of therapeutic drugs into the inner ear shows promise for the treatment of inner ear disorders. A systemic or local approach can be used to deliver drugs into the inner ear. Some inner ear diseases are successfully treated with systemic drug administration, such as idiopathic sudden hearing loss, which is commonly treated with systemic steroid1. In addition, Lentz et al. showed that systemic administration of antisense oligonucleotide was able to improve hearing and balance functions in the Ush1c mutant mouse model2. However, a large portion of inner ear diseases are not effectively treated by systemic drug administration because of the blood-labyrinth barrier, which limits drug access to the inner ear3,4. In contrast, local drug delivery strategies can treat inner ear disorders more efficiently. Indeed, the inner ear is potentially an ideal target for local drug delivery; it is filled with fluid, which facilitates dissemination of the drug after one-site diffusion or injection, and it is relatively isolated from neighboring organs, which limits side-effects5,6.
Local drug delivery strategies include intratympanic and intralabyrinthine methods. The effectiveness of the intratympanic route largely relies on drug permeability through the round window membrane (RWM) and the residence time of the drug on the RWM3,4,7,8. Thus, it is not suitable for the delivery of drugs or reagents that cannot penetrate the RWM. Intralabyrinthine methods involve inoculation of drugs directly into the inner ear, resulting in a high dose and widespread distribution. However, intralabyrinthine methods require delicate surgeries and are invasive, leading to damage to inner ear function. Currently, the intralabyrinthine injection of drugs is used only in animal studies as it has not been demonstrated to be sufficiently safe for use in humans9. Therefore, surgical procedures must be simplified, and the risk of injury reduced to translate intralabyrinthine approaches into the clinic.
Several intralabyrinthine approaches have been assessed in animals by injection through the RWM5,10,11 and into the scala media12,13,14, the scala tympani15,16, the scala vestibule17, the semicircular canals16,18,19,20, and the endolymphatic sac21. Each of these approaches has advantages and disadvantages6. Delivery through the RWM is atraumatic in neonatal mice5,22. However, a mild hearing loss is observed in adult mice after RWM injection23, possibly due to middle ear effusion after the surgery24. Scala media injection, which involves the injection of the reagent directly into the endolymphatic space containing the sensory epithelium, achieves a high reagent concentration in target end-organs12,14,25,26. However, this approach requires a complex procedure and results in significant elevation of the hearing threshold if performed later than postnatal day 5 (P5)25,27, which limits its application.
Compared to the above-mentioned intralabyrinthine approaches, canalostomy causes minimal damage to the inner ear, especially in adult mice16,18,28,29,30, which is important for the assessment of protective effects and translational aspects. Furthermore, in rodents, the semicircular canals are located beyond the bulla, which facilitates surgical procedures and avoids disturbance of the middle ear during surgery. In the clinic, semicircular canal surgeries are used for intractable benign paroxysmal positional vertigo31,32,33, suggesting the clinical feasibility of canalostomy. Since it was first described by Kawamoto et al.16 in 2001, canalostomy has been used to deliver various reagents, such as viral vectors, siRNA, stem cells, and aminoglycoside, into the murine inner ear18,19,28,29,34,35,36,37. Inoculation of adeno-associated virus (AAV) vectors by canalostomy enable overexpression of exogenous genes in the sensory epithelium and primary neurons of the cochlea and vestibular end-organs18,28,29,30. Whirlin gene therapy by canalostomy restores balance function and improves hearing in a mouse model of human Usher syndrome19, suggesting that canalostomy is useful for studies of gene therapy for genetic cochleovestibular diseases. Transplantation of mesenchymal stem cells by canalostomy results in reorganization of cochlear fibrocytes and hearing recovery in a rat model of acute sensorineural hearing loss35. Additionally, canalostomy can be used to introduce aminoglycosides into the inner ear to establish vestibular lesions18,34,38, and multiple injections can be performed if required18,34.
In the present article, we describe, in detail, canalostomy techniques in adult and neonatal mice. We inoculated various reagents, including fast-green dye and AAV serotype 8 (AAV8), together with the green fluorescent protein (GFP) gene (AAV8-GFP) and streptomycin, into the mouse inner ear to evaluate the immediate and long-term outcomes after canalostomy.