$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
Inflammasome-mediated inflammation is a critical component of the defense against pathogenic organisms1, but also underlies the etiology of many diseases2. The inflammatory response to a wide range of infections is triggered by cytosolic detection of pathogen associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) or damage associated molecular patterns (DAMPs). Pattern recognition receptors (PRR), including members of the NOD-like receptor (NLR) family, oligomerize upon the detection of these PAMPs and DAMPs. This triggers the formation of a multi-protein complex termed the inflammasome, which contains the PRR, the adaptor protein Apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a C-terminal caspase-recruitment domain (CARD) (ASC), and the pro-form of caspase-13,4. This complex allows proximity-induced auto-activation of caspase-1. Active caspase-1 then leads to a set of events that are characteristic of the inflammatory cell death pathway pyroptosis. These events include: the cleavage and release of the inflammatory cytokines IL-1β and IL-18, lysosome exocytosis with release of lysosomal contents into the extracellular space, nuclear condensation, and gasdermin D cleavage. The released N-terminal domain of gasdermin D inserts into the plasma membrane, forming pores that cause plasma membrane rupture and release of inflammatory contents, in addition to taking away a protective niche for pathogen replication5,6,7.
Here, we focus on the well-studied NLRP3 inflammasome. The activation of the NLRP3 inflammasome occurs through a two-step process8. The first "priming" step occurs through the recognition by Toll-like receptors (TLR) of a microbial product. This is replicated in the laboratory setting by using LPS to stimulate TLR4. This stimulation upregulates NLRP3 and pro-IL-1β through NF-kB signaling. Priming additionally licenses NLRP3 through non-transcriptional mechanisms by inducing its deubiquitination9,10 and phosphorylation or dephosphorylation of specific residues11,12.
The second signal for NLRP3 activation is thought to involve mitochondrial factors, reactive oxygen species, potassium efflux and calcium signaling, although a unifying mechanism for NLRP3 activation remains elusive8. Activated NLRP3 oligomerizes through interactions between its NACHT domains, and recruits ASC via binding of the pyrin (PYD) domains13. In each cell, these macromolecular complexes form a single microscopically visible focus. ASC was originally identified as a 22 KDa protein that forms a "speck" during the apoptosis of human leukemia cells, and named apoptosis-associated speck-like protein containing a CARD14. It was later determined that ASC recruits pro-caspase-1 through the interaction of the CARD of ASC with the CARD of pro-caspase-1, forming the inflammasome15.
Not all NLRs require the presence of ASC to induce caspase-1 activation. Unlike NLRP3, NLRC4 and NLRP1b have CARD domains and can directly recruit pro-caspase-1 via CARD-CARD interactions to induce caspase-1 activation. In the absence of ASC, active caspase-1 remains diffuse throughout the cytosol and does not form a single focus. This diffuse active caspase-1 is sufficient to induce pyroptotic cell death, but is unable to process pro-IL-1β13,16.
In this manuscript, we will discuss two ways to assess inflammasome activation. The first uses the fluorescent activity probe, FAM-YVAD-FMK, which binds the caspase-1 family of proteases. This family includes caspase-1, but also mouse caspase-11 and human caspase-4 and caspase-5. By using macrophages from caspase-1/11 deficient mice in all experiments, the specificity of this probe will be addressed. This method can be combined with antibody labeling of inflammasome components, which we will also describe. Microscopic visualization allows for the identification of individual cells containing active caspase-1 and oligomerized ASC. Using this method, researchers will be able to determine where in the inflammasome formation cascade their manipulations of the host cell or the pathogenic organism under study have an effect. For example, one can distinguish whether a given intervention prevents the recruitment of ASC to the NLRP3 complex or targets the subsequent recruitment and activation of caspase-117. Examining outcomes of caspase-1 activation such as IL-1β secretion would not be able to distinguish between these two possibilities. Also, the secretion of IL-1β could be altered without altering the cells ability to activate caspase-1 and undergo pyroptotic cell death16.
The second method measures the release of lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) into the cell supernatant, which occurs during pyroptotic macrophage lysis following caspase-1 activation as described above. This second method is a population-based approach as the release of LDH in the entire well is measured. This simple approach allows for the rapid analysis (30 min of incubation time) of samples to determine if there is caspase-1-mediated cell death and can be performed in a 96-well plate format.
These methods are complementary, each with different advantages, and both are easily amenable to modifications. For example, macrophage treatment with targeted small molecular weight compounds prior to inflammasome stimulation can be used to investigate the role certain proteins may have on controlling inflammatory responses.