This protocol optimizes efficient naïve-like reversion with LIF-3i in both feeder-dependent and feeder-independent lineage-primed conventional hPSC cultures (Figure 1). The detailed protocol, described herein, outlines sequential adaptation to LIF-3i starting from either feeder-dependent or feeder-free conventional hPSC conditions (e.g. E8 medium).
Representative results for the LIF-3i reversion of several conventional hESC and transgene-free hiPSC lines are presented in Figures 1–3. These typical results can be validated with the commercially available hESC line H9, or with a commercially available transgene-free, cord blood-derived episomal hiPSC line (6.2) derived in the Zambidis laboratory8,9. Introduction of an initial LIF-5i adaptation step permits highly efficient subsequent, bulk clonal propagation of conventional hPSC cultures in LIF-3i, and does not require anti-apoptotic agents or ROCK inhibitors10 (Figure 1A, B). Multiple plates of naïve-like hPSC samples can be rapidly collected for downstream analyses or multilineage directed differentiation only after 5–7 passages in LIF-3i. Alternatively, LIF-3i cultures can be cryopreserved for future applications. Post-thawing cell recovery can be improved (Figure 2) via inclusion of a ROCK inhibitor in cryopreservation and post-thaw media11.
The determinants of molecular and functional pluripotency, both in vitro and in the embryo were recently reviewed2. These factors include the genetic background, culture-associated acquisition of mutations for key developmental genes, and differences in hESC and hiPSC derivation and culture methodologies. Provided below is a summary of standard assays that can be employed for characterization and validation of the phenotypic, molecular, and functional pluripotencies of LIF-3i-reverted hPSC.
Colony morphology
The transition between primed, conventional and LIF-3i-reverted culture systems is accompanied by distinct physical changes in hPSC colony morphology (Figure 1B). Conventional hPSC cells proliferate as flat, wide monolayer colonies that expand rapidly from small cell clumps (on MEF or feeder-free conditions), but poorly as single cells. Exposure of conventional hPSC lines to LIF-3i promotes the growth and expansion and of smaller, tightly-packed, dome-shaped colonies that arise clonally from single cells. These morphological changes are completely reversible, and LIF-3i-reverted dome-shaped colonies can spontaneously transition back to a conventional monolayer morphology if LIF-3i is withdrawn and cells are re-cultured in standard conventional hESC medium supplemented with bFGF. Additionally, expansion of LIF-3i-reverted cells at high confluent densities (or prolonged culture without frequent passaging) results in the spontaneous reacquisition of the flat, conventional morphology with reduced clonal efficiency; emphasizing the need for diligent maintenance and care of LIF-3i-reverted hPSC (e.g., <40–60% confluence).
Live immunofluorescence staining and flow cytometric analysis of surface pluripotency markers
Evaluation of pluripotency markers during the transition from conventional to a naïve-like state following continuous LIF-3i culture can be monitored non-invasively using live antibody staining without detecting any negative effects on LIF-3i/MEF expansion (e.g., live-staining fluorochrome-conjugated antibodies against TRA-1-81, TRA-1-60, and SSEA4).
Retention of pluripotency during LIF-3i reversion can also be routinely monitored by flow cytometric analysis of pluripotency-associated surface marker expression of TRA-1 and SSEA antigens during single cell passaging (Figure 1C) or immunofluorescence of intact, fixed colonies in situ (Figure 3). Although these markers do not discriminate between conventional and LIF-3i states, their levels inversely correlate with the frequency of spontaneous differentiation that may occur in hPSC when transitioning from conventional hPSC to LIF-3i conditions. Additional surface antigens that may more specifically mark human naïve-like states in vitro2,12,13 can also be employed to detect effective LIF-3i hPSC reversion.
Validation of molecular pluripotency of N-hPSC
Because the genetic background of hPSC lines has been characterized as a strong contributor to interline variability, it is important to rigorously assess isogenic cultures at matching culture timepoints when comparing hPSC culture systems (Figure 4). Since some of these systems have already been shown to generate hPSC populations with aberrant genomic and epigenetic configurations2, any naïve reversion method should be assayed with a number of N-hPSC of independent genetic backgrounds, in a manner that is sufficient to validate biological reproducibility and exclude non-developmentally relevant "pseudo-pluripotent" states (i.e., with apparent hallmarks of molecular pluripotency but lacking functional differentiation abilities). Zimmerlin et al. further extended the validation of the LIF-3i culture system to include assaying the molecular and functional pluripotencies of reverted N-hiPSC derived from various reprogramming methods, which is another known putative contributor of functional variability between pluripotent states2.
Accordingly, most studies of human naïve culture systems have focused on assaying molecular pluripotency of N-hPSC at 1) the epigenetic level (e.g., histone marks by ChIP sequencing or ChIP-PCR, global DNA methylation by immunoblots or whole genomic bisulfite sequencing, allele-specific CpG methylation microarrays, OCT4 enhancer predominant usage by reporter systems, global activity at regulatory elements by DNAse I hypersensitivity, and repeat element profiling by RNA-sequencing), 2) transcriptomic level (RNA-sequencing, expression microarrays, and quantitative RT-PCR), protein expression analysis (e.g., FACS, immunofluorescent microscopy, and Western blotting) and 3) via metabolic studies (e.g., glycolysis, oxidative phosphorylation and nicotinamide metabolism). Representative examples of immunofluorescence stains and Western blot detection of expression for key markers of molecular pluripotency are shown (Figure 3B, C). For example, shown in Figure 3B are activated phosphorylated (phospho) and total isoforms of STAT3 and ERK1/2, which are key molecular hallmarks of mouse ESC-like naïve pluripotency. These were detected using anti-STAT3 and anti-ERK1/2 primary antibodies. Additionally, functional pluripotency in teratoma differentiation assays is demonstrated in conventional vs. LIF-3i-reverted hPSC teratoma tissues dissected 10 weeks following injection and fixed in 4% formaldehyde and paraffin embedded (Figure 3D).
Preparation of LIF-3i/MEF or hESC/MEF/bFGF samples for downstream molecular analysis should include MEF depletion. Two approaches are described above for MEF depletion that have been successfully employed in our laboratory. MEF pre-plating is a simple, reliable, and cost-efficient method to eliminate feeders from N-hPSC samples for molecular studies and is a preferred alternative to FACS or MACS separation (i.e., anti-TRA-1-81 or anti-TRA-1-60 antibody-based separation). Additionally, spontaneously-differentiating TRA-1-negative adherent cells in LIF-5i/LIF-3i cultures can be rapidly eliminated from LIF-5i/LIF-3i N-hPSC cultures prior to subsequent LIF-3i passage onto fresh MEF by pre-plating the enzymatically-digested single cells for 1 h on plates pre-coated with 0.1% gelatin (Figure 2).
Evaluation of functional pluripotency of N-hPSC
The most rigorous assay of functional pluripotency of PSC is the blastocyst injection chimera assay, which is limited in the testing of N-hPSC lines for ethical reasons. Alternatively, several groups that have reported the generation of N-hPSC with various other methods have attempted to generate interspecies chimeras. However, these attempts have yielded extremely low or unsuccessful contribution of differentiated N-hPSC lineages to murine or porcine embryos, in comparison to the chimera-generating capacity of standard mouse ESC2.
Additional functional studies have investigated directed in vitro differentiation of putative N-hPSC derived via various methods, but have revealed biased, defective, or diminished multilineage differentiation capacity, with concomitant harboring of epigenetic abnormalities2,13. Similar epigenomic aberrations, especially at imprinted loci, have been detected in mouse ESC following prolonged exposure to the LIF-2i cocktail14. Interestingly, some reversion culture systems have reported global improvements in specific attributes of functional pluripotency of PSC such as the enhanced capacity for in vivo trophectoderm contribution2,15.
Using a broad collection of independently-derived LIF-3i-reverted hPSC, Zimmerlin et al. employed multilineage differentiation assays to show that the LIF-3i system dramatically improves the functional pluripotency of conventional hPSC lines3. This allows systematic analysis of conventional vs LIF-3i hPSC lines in isogenic pairs to eliminate interline-dependent variations (Figure 4). LIF-3i-reverted hPSC lines do not require a re-priming step prior to EB differentiation. However, LIF-3i hPSC proliferate at significantly higher clonal rates than isogenic cells expanded in E8, and thus, initial lower plating densities require adjustment to allow each culture to reach confluence at a similar timepoint.
Investigators should routinely utilize multiple assays to demonstrate the improved functionality of LIF-3i-reverted hPSC that includes not only in vivo teratoma assays but also in vitro directed differentiation assays to neural, definitive endoderm and hematovascular lineages3 using multiple assays (e.g., 2D APEL3,16 and 3D embryoid body17,18 systems). To control for assay-dependent reproducibility, at least two different differentiation methods should be performed in replicate for each isogenic pair of primed/LIF-3i hPSC cultures (e.g., Figure 4, APEL, embryoid body differentiation protocols). The experimental design should include a robust number (e.g., >3–5) primed/LIF-3i isogenic pairs of hPSC lines from multiple, independent donor genetic backgrounds (Figure 4).

Figure 1: A stepwise transition of conventional, lineage-primed hPSC cultures to naïve-like conditions with the LIF-3i method. (A) Schema of protocols for stepwise LIF-3i reversion. (Top schematic) A general method for the transition of primed, conventional hPSC to LIF-3i cultures. (Bottom schematics) Two summarized strategies for LIF-3i naïve reversion of conventional (primed) hPSC cultured on either feeder (i.e., Primed/MEF to LIF-3i/MEF), or feeder-free conditions (i.e, Primed/E8 to LIF-3i/MEF). (B) Human PSC morphologies. Shown are representative photomicrographs of hPSC during LIF-3i reversion using a commercially available human episomal iPSC line (6.2). Shown are the transitions observed between initial conventional flat monolayer colonies, and the subsequent dome-shaped clonogenic colonies that arise following passage in intermediate LIF-5i and stable LIF-3i culture conditions. Scale bars = 200 µm. (C) Representative flow cytometric analyses of pluripotency surface markers. Shown are TRA-1-81 and SSEA-4 surface expressions in conventional hPSC line 6.2 (p40) expanded in E8, the initial passage in LIF-5i/MEF, and following 1 to 9 passages (P1-P9) in LIF-3i conditions. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 2: Cryopreservation of N-hPSC and sample preparation by MEF pre-plating. (A) Example of a freeze/thaw cycle of LIF-3i/MEF cultures. The conventional cord blood-derived, non-integrated, transgene-free human iPSC line E5C3 was derived and expanded on MEF feeders in hESC medium supplemented with 4ng/mL bFGF for 18 passages. Conventional, lineage-primed E5C3 were adapted in LIF-5i (left) and transitioned into LIF-3i medium for 3 passages (center). The E5C3 LIF-3i cells shown in the center panel were cryopreserved using DMSO-based cryoprotectant medium (Table 2; 1 x 106 cells per vial) and stored in liquid nitrogen). One vial was thawed a month later and E5C3 cells were transferred in a feeder-coated well of a 6-well plate (right). Cell recovery can be enhanced by supplementing the LIF-3i medium with 5 µM Y-27632 for only one day post-thaw. Scale bars = 200 µm. (B) Elimination of MEF (and also adherent TRA-negative differentiated cells) in LIF-3i/MEF hPSC cultures by the pre-plating method. Shown are flow cytometric analyses before and after pre-plating of PE-conjugated anti-TRA-1-81 and TRA-1-60 antibodies, APC-conjugated SSEA-4 antibodies and SSEA-1/CD15 antibodies demonstrating depletion of TRA-1 antigen negative and MEF cells using the one-hour pre-plating method. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 3: Characterization of pluripotency in LIF-3i/MEF N-hPSC cultures. (A) Surface and nuclear pluripotency markers. Expression of pluripotency factor NANOG in the same (isogenic) TRA-1-81+SSEA4+ conventional, primed cord blood-derived hiPSC line E5C3 (p39) expanded in either primed (E8), or naive LIF-3i (+p8 in LIF-3i/MEF) conditions. Immunofluorescent stains of representative hPSC cultures on chamber slides revealed the uniform, nuclear expression of the core pluripotency factor NANOG in SSEA-4+TRA-1-81+ hPSC cultured in primed, conventional (E8 medium) or LIF-3i/MEF conditions. Scale bar = 100 µm. (B) Western blot analysis. STAT3 (left), ERK (center), and control beta-ACTIN protein expression for a representative hPSC line (hESC line H9) in conventional (E8 medium) or LIF-3i/MEF conditions (3i). (C) Expression of naïve pluripotency-associated transcription factors. Shown are STELLA/DPPA3, NR5A2, and TFCP2L1 by immunofluorescence in a representative LIF-3i/MEF culture (cord blood-derived hiPSC line E5C3 at p33 (hESC/MEF) +p8 (LIF-3i/MEF). Scale bar = 100 µm. (D) Teratoma assays of conventional and LIF-3i-reverted hPSC. Validation of functional pluripotency in an isogenic representative hiPSC line (cord blood-derived E32C6) cultured in either E8 (p9) or LIF-3i/MEF (+p12) by teratoma assay. 10 x 106 cells of isogenic parallel-cultured conventional, primed vs LIF-3i-reverted hPSC were injected subcutaneously into the limbs of immunodeficient NSG mice. Hematoxylin and eosin stains of teratoma microsections revealed robust differentiation into all three germ layers with well-structured ectoderm (neural rosette: NR, retinal pigmented epitheliam: RPE), mesoderm (chondroblasts: Ch), and endoderm (glandular tissue: GI) lineages. Scale bars = 100 µm. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.

Figure 4: Comparison of functional pluripotency between isogenic primed and naïve states. (A) Schematic of strategy for assessing functional pluripotency from distinct pluripotent states in isogenic conventional vs. LIF-3i cultured hPSC in independent differentiation protocols. Shown are two hemato-vascular progenitor differentiation systems (APEL monolayer and 3D embryoid body (EB) systems) that were previously employed to assess differentiation potency of conventional vs. LIF-3i-reverted in the same (isogenic) hPSC line cultured in parallel post LIF-3i reversion with same passage numbers. LIF-3i-reverted hPSC lines do not require a re-priming step prior to EB differentiation and are subjected to the differentiation protocol directly. (B) EB vascular progenitor (VP) differentiation system. The EB 3D differentiation system employed for this study was previously described17,18. Shown are the representative results at day 10 of EB differentiation (left panels) for isogenic cultures of the same cord blood (CB)-derived E5C3 hPSC line9, cultured in either conventional hESC/MEF (Primed/ MEF) conditions or LIF-3i/MEF naïve conditions. Flow cytometry analysis of these EB cells show dramatic increases of CD31+CD146+ VP populations following LIF-3i reversion of the E5C3 line prior to differentiation. The histogram displays the mean ±SD of CD31+CD146+ VP cell percentages recovered at day 10 in this EB system using three isogenic pairs of independent hPSC lines (i.e., two CB-hiPSC and one adult fibroblast-derived hiPSC, dotted lines connect isogenic pairs). Results demonstrate significant improvement of VP differentiation efficiencies in the EB system across genetic backgrounds of multiple hPSC lines. (C) APEL monolayer vascular progenitor differentiation system. Conventional (primed E8) and LIF-3i-reverted hPSC can be directly differentiated using the same culture conditions, growth factors, cytokines and small molecules of the stepwise APEL endothelial differentiation protocol 3,16. Shown are independent APEL differentiation experiments using the E5C3 cord blood-derived hiPSC line, and the percentage of CD31+CD146+ vascular progenitor populations at day 7 of APEL differentiation. Please click here to view a larger version of this figure.
| | Mouse Embryonic Fibroblast (MEF) Medium
(500mL) | human embryonic stem cell (hESC)
Medium
(500mL) | LIF-5i
(500mL) | LIF-3i
(500mL) |
media
and supplements | DMEM high glucose | 439.5mL | - | - | - |
| DMEM/F12 | - | 391.5mL | 391.5mL | 391.5mL |
| fetal bovine serum | 50mL | - | - | - |
| KnockOut serum replacement | - | 100mL | 100mL | 100mL |
| L-Glutamine (200mM) | 2.5mL | 2.5mL | 2.5mL | 2.5mL |
| MEM Non-essential amino acid (MEM NEAA), 10mM | 5mL | 5mL | 5mL | 5mL |
| Penicillin/streptomycin (100X) | 2.5mL | - | - | - |
| β-mercaptoethanol (55mM) | 0.5mL (0.055mM) | 910µL (0.1mM) | 910µL (0.1mM) | 910µL (0.1mM) |
cytokines
and small molecules | recombinant basic FGF (100µg/mL) | - | 50µL (10ng/mL) | 50µL (10ng/mL) | - |
| recombinant human LIF (100µg/mL) | - | - | 100µL (20ng/mL) | 100µL (20ng/mL) |
| CHIR99021 (100mM) | - | - | 15µL (3µM) | 15µL (3µM) |
| PD0325901 (100mM) | - | - | 5µL (1µM) | 5µL (1µM) |
| XAV939 (100mM) | - | - | 20µL (4µM) | 20µL (4µM) |
| Forskolin (100mM) | - | - | 50µL (10µM) | - |
| Purmorphamine (10mM) | - | - | 100µL (2µM) | - |
Table 1:
| LIF-3i crypreservation medium
(10mL) |
| hESC medium (Table 1) | 40% |
| KnockOut serum replacement | 50% |
| dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) | 10% |
| Y-27632 | 5 µM |
Table 2: