$$\rightleftharpoonup{xx}$$
$$\longleftharp{xx}$$,
$$\longrightharp{xx}$$,
In virus outbreak situations, when patients are confined to the hospital isolation wards or when a fast diagnosis is needed, a safe, simple, and accurate point-of-care molecular diagnosis is imperative for the patient care and risk containment. The two recent viral outbreaks, of the Ebola virus (EBOV) in West Africa (2013) and the Zika virus in South America (2015), have increased the interest in improved point-of-care molecular diagnostic tests, such as reverse transcription loop-mediated isothermal amplification (RT-LAMP)1,2 and recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA)3,4. Both RT-LAMP and RPA are rapid, sensitive, and specific molecular tests that can be performed on simplified sample preparations. For the Zika virus, RT-LAMP has been combined with a lateral flow assay (LFA), which can detect Zika virus in non-purified whole blood samples within 30 min1; however, for EBOV, which is classified as a risk group 4 pathogen and is highly contagious, the samples need to be handled under biosafety level 4 (BSL-4) conditions and inactivated before any safe diagnostic procedures can be performed.
Simplified inactivation methods for EBOV, such as the addition of lysis buffers to the sample2,3,4,5, were used during the outbreak; however, these methods require handling under BSL-4 conditions with laboratory equipment, such as BSL-3 biosafety cabinets, centrifuges, heating blocks, and pipettes, at a minimum. This equipment is normally not present in isolation wards or out in field hospitals. To overcome this challenge, attempts have been made to perform diagnostics in suitcases3, and several portable devices and machines have been developed [e.g., a portable device for nucleic acid (NA) extraction]6. However, EBOV-positive samples still need to be inactivated before these devices can be used.
We have previously reported a rapid bedside virus inactivation method for the EBOV7, Vaccinia virus, and Cowpox virus8 by addition of a commercial lysis/binding buffer to ordinary vacuum blood collection tubes, allowing for the direct transfer of blood from the patient into the inactivation buffer7. This direct and immediate inactivation in a closed system eliminates the need for handling the samples using any rigorous containment, such as BSL-4 conditions7, and the samples can be handled under normal BSL-2 conditions. This inactivation method is compatible with several NA extraction systems, such as robots and hand purification kits7; however, these methods require laboratory equipment, such as robots, centrifuges, and electricity, which are not always present in field settings or inside hospital isolation wards.
In this report, we describe a safe, rapid, and simplified manual NA extraction method for the subsequent molecular detection of a virus in lysis/binding buffer-inactivated whole blood. The NA extraction method does not require any equipment other than a magnet/magnetic holder. No centrifuges, heating blocks, or electricity are needed for the NA extraction. Hence, this method is not dependent on laboratory facilities and can easily be used anywhere (e.g., in field hospitals, in hospital isolation wards, or with low-resource settings). The NA extraction method is rapid and simple and can be used directly in any downstream NA tests, such as qPCR, RT-qPCR, LAMP, or RT-LAMP. When this NA extraction method is combined with LAMP and a portable battery-driven isothermal instrument, a bedside diagnosis can be obtained within 40 min of the blood collection.